Markets qualify here on settled bets only, ranked by units — no projections and no
back-fitting. Nobody bets every pick on this board: what people actually follow is the Best 3 card, a bot
they picked off the Zoo, or a fade — each carrying its own graded record. The full breakdown, winning and losing
markets alike, is one tap above.
Every market, ranked · 8 markets with 50+ settled bets · 4 profitable, 4 not · winners and losers on the same scale.
Strongest marketMLB · F5 Total+5.1u64-57 · +4.2% ROI over 121 settled bets
F5 TotalMLB
+5.1u64-57 · +4.2% · 121 bets
F3 MLMLB
+5.1u36-35 · +7.2% · 71 bets
F3 TotalMLB
+3.4u67-54 · +2.8% · 121 bets
MoneylineMLB
+2.5u45-35 · +3.2% · 80 bets
Total (O/U)MiLB
-2.9u62-60 · -2.3% · 122 bets
MoneylineMiLB
-8.6u52-52 · -8.3% · 104 bets
Total (O/U)MLB
-48.6u93-141 · -20.8% · 234 bets
Player PropsMLB
-98.6u1083-851 · -5.1% · 1934 bets
← losseswins →
+ 44 markets still building a sample — under 50 bets
DrawMLS
+8.9u4-3 · +127.9% · 7 bets
Total (O/U)Bundesliga
+8.7u10-3 · +66.9% · 13 bets
Total (O/U)Portugal Primeira Liga
+8.4u13-6 · +44.0% · 19 bets
MoneylineEPL
+7.6u5-3 · +95.6% · 8 bets
Spread / Run lineMiLB
+5.2u11-7 · +28.8% · 18 bets
Total (O/U)Argentina
+4.6u21-23 · +10.5% · 44 bets
Total (O/U)Allsvenskan
+4.3u8-5 · +33.3% · 13 bets
Player PropsWNBA
+4.0u15-9 · +16.7% · 24 bets
Total (O/U)Eliteserien
+3.9u5-2 · +55.0% · 7 bets
Total (O/U)Ligue 1
+3.5u7-5 · +29.2% · 12 bets
Total (O/U)Eredivisie
+3.4u8-6 · +24.3% · 14 bets
Total (O/U)Serie A
+2.7u9-8 · +15.9% · 17 bets
Total (O/U)Belgium 1st
+2.5u4-2 · +42.5% · 6 bets
Total (O/U)Korea Kleague1
+2.4u5-3 · +30.4% · 8 bets
Total (O/U)EFL Cup
+1.8u5-4 · +19.4% · 9 bets
Total (O/U)Superettan
+1.1u5-5 · +10.5% · 10 bets
Total (O/U)Brasileirão
+1.0u6-6 · +8.6% · 12 bets
Spread / Run lineNCAAF
+0.7u19-17 · +1.9% · 36 bets
Total (O/U)MLS
+0.4u18-20 · +1.0% · 38 bets
DrawItaly Serie B
+0.3u2-4 · +5.8% · 6 bets
MoneylineNCAAF
-0.4u10-16 · -1.6% · 26 bets
Spread / Run lineMLB
-0.5u3-4 · -6.9% · 7 bets
Total (O/U)Poland Ekstraklasa
-0.5u3-4 · -7.1% · 7 bets
Total (O/U)Americanfootball Ncaaf Fcs
-0.8u8-8 · -5.2% · 16 bets
Total (O/U)NCAAF
-0.8u11-11 · -3.9% · 22 bets
Total (O/U)EFL League 1
-1.1u11-13 · -4.7% · 24 bets
Total (O/U)Swiss SL
-1.1u5-7 · -9.6% · 12 bets
Total (O/U)Chile Primera
-1.6u4-6 · -15.5% · 10 bets
Total (O/U)Japan J League
-1.6u3-5 · -20.6% · 8 bets
F5 MLMLB
-2.3u15-24 · -5.8% · 39 bets
Total (O/U)Scotland Prem
-3.2u3-7 · -32.5% · 10 bets
Total (O/U)Uefa Champs League
-3.5u3-7 · -34.5% · 10 bets
F1 TotalMLB
-3.6u17-18 · -10.3% · 35 bets
Total (O/U)WNBA
-4.1u2-6 · -51.7% · 8 bets
Player PropsNFL
-4.3u18-20 · -11.2% · 38 bets
Total (O/U)EFL Champ
-5.2u10-16 · -20.0% · 26 bets
Total (O/U)Italy Serie B
-6.3u6-13 · -33.3% · 19 bets
Total (O/U)Greece Super League
-6.4u3-10 · -49.0% · 13 bets
Total (O/U)2. Bundesliga
-6.8u1-8 · -75.6% · 9 bets
Total (O/U)Superliga
-7.2u5-13 · -39.7% · 18 bets
Total (O/U)EPL
-8.8u1-10 · -80.0% · 11 bets
Total (O/U)Spain Segunda Division
-9.2u5-15 · -46.1% · 20 bets
Total (O/U)La Liga
-12.0u4-17 · -57.1% · 21 bets
Total (O/U)Brazil Série B
-12.6u7-21 · -44.9% · 28 bets
50 more markets have fewer than 6 settled bets and are not charted yet.
The Zoo runs 300+ bots across 3,695 settled bets, many deliberately on opposite sides of the same game — so the bots summed together are not a bet anyone could place, and not the method. Split by market, here is where the edge actually is. See every bet, wins and losses →
Where MIDAS has an edge · each sport led by its best market
24 of 52 markets in the black · +91.6u combined across 714 settled bets · every sport × bet type we have a record in, winners and losers
MLBEDGE
F3 ML+5.1u
36-35 · +7% ROI · n=71
+8 more markets in this league
F5 Total +5.1u64-57F3 Total +3.4u67-54Game ML +2.6u45-35Spread -0.5u3-4F5 ML -2.3u15-24
MLSEARLY · n=7
Draw+8.9u
4-3 · +128% ROI · n=7
+1 more market in this league
Game Total +0.4u18-20
BundesligaEARLY · n=13
Game Total+8.7u
10-3 · +67% ROI · n=13
Portugal Primeira LigaEARLY · n=19
Game Total+8.4u
13-6 · +44% ROI · n=19
EPLEARLY · n=8
Game ML+7.6u
5-3 · +96% ROI · n=8
+1 more market in this league
Game Total -8.8u1-10
MiLBEARLY · n=18
Spread+5.2u
11-7 · +29% ROI · n=18
+2 more markets in this league
Game Total -2.9u62-60Game ML -8.6u52-52
ArgentinaEARLY · n=44
Game Total+4.6u
21-23 · +10% ROI · n=44
AllsvenskanEARLY · n=13
Game Total+4.3u
8-5 · +33% ROI · n=13
WNBAEARLY · n=24
Props+4.0u
15-9 · +17% ROI · n=24
+1 more market in this league
Game Total -4.1u2-6
EliteserienEARLY · n=7
Game Total+3.9u
5-2 · +55% ROI · n=7
Ligue 1EARLY · n=12
Game Total+3.5u
7-5 · +29% ROI · n=12
EredivisieEARLY · n=14
Game Total+3.4u
8-6 · +24% ROI · n=14
Serie AEARLY · n=17
Game Total+2.7u
9-8 · +16% ROI · n=17
Belgium 1stEARLY · n=6
Game Total+2.5u
4-2 · +42% ROI · n=6
Korea Kleague1EARLY · n=8
Game Total+2.4u
5-3 · +30% ROI · n=8
EFL CupEARLY · n=9
Game Total+1.8u
5-4 · +19% ROI · n=9
SuperettanEARLY · n=10
Game Total+1.0u
5-5 · +10% ROI · n=10
BrasileirãoEARLY · n=12
Game Total+1.0u
6-6 · +9% ROI · n=12
NCAAFEARLY · n=36
Spread+0.7u
19-17 · +2% ROI · n=36
+2 more markets in this league
Game ML -0.4u10-16Game Total -0.8u11-11
Italy Serie BEARLY · n=6
Draw+0.4u
2-4 · +6% ROI · n=6
+1 more market in this league
Game Total -6.3u6-13
+ 16 markets still working — the cells we'd prune first
Poland Ekstraklasaleast soft
Game Total-0.5u
3-4 · -7% ROI · n=7
Americanfootball Ncaaf Fcsleast soft
Game Total-0.8u
8-8 · -5% ROI · n=16
EFL League 1least soft
Game Total-1.1u
11-13 · -5% ROI · n=24
Swiss SLleast soft
Game Total-1.2u
5-7 · -10% ROI · n=12
Chile Primeraleast soft
Game Total-1.6u
4-6 · -16% ROI · n=10
Japan J Leagueleast soft
Game Total-1.6u
3-5 · -21% ROI · n=8
Scotland Premleast soft
Game Total-3.2u
3-7 · -32% ROI · n=10
Uefa Champs Leagueleast soft
Game Total-3.5u
3-7 · -34% ROI · n=10
NFLleast soft
Props-4.3u
18-20 · -11% ROI · n=38
EFL Champleast soft
Game Total-5.2u
10-16 · -20% ROI · n=26
Greece Super Leagueleast soft
Game Total-6.4u
3-10 · -49% ROI · n=13
2. Bundesligaleast soft
Game Total-6.8u
1-8 · -76% ROI · n=9
Superligaleast soft
Game Total-7.2u
5-13 · -40% ROI · n=18
Spain Segunda Divisionleast soft
Game Total-9.2u
5-15 · -46% ROI · n=20
La Ligaleast soft
Game Total-12.0u
4-17 · -57% ROI · n=21
Brazil Série Bleast soft
Game Total-12.6u
7-21 · -45% ROI · n=28
Full breakdown — every sport and bet type, winners and losers
By sport & Zeus · lifetime P&L
Net and record are lifetime. Each bar chart is the last 7 days.49 sports, biggest net first
Argentina+13.36u
25-24 · 51%
MLS+13.33u
23-25 · 48%
Bundesliga+8.70u
10-3 · 77%
Portugal Primeira Liga+7.36u
13-7 · 65%
Eredivisie+6.50u
10-10 · 50%
Allsvenskan+5.83u
9-6 · 60%
Belgium 1st+5.15u
5-2 · 71%
Eliteserien+3.85u
5-2 · 71%
Ligue 1+3.50u
7-5 · 58%
EPL+3.09u
7-13 · 35%
Serie A+1.80u
10-11 · 48%
Concacaf Leagues Cup+1.20u
1-0 · 100%
Superettan+1.05u
5-5 · 50%
CFL+0.75u
2-1 · 67%
WNBA+0.72u
20-17 · 54%
Veikkausliiga+0.50u
2-2 · 50%
Korea Kleague1+0.43u
5-5 · 50%
EFL League 1+0.26u
12-14 · 46%
Poland Ekstraklasa-0.50u
3-4 · 43%
NCAAF-0.56u
40-44 · 48%
Americanfootball Ncaaf Fcs-0.83u
8-8 · 50%
Brasileirão-0.97u
6-8 · 43%
Italy Coppa Italia-1.00u
0-1 · 0%
Uefa Champs League Women-1.00u
0-1 · 0%
EFL Cup-1.25u
5-7 · 42%
Chile Primera-1.55u
4-6 · 40%
Japan J League-1.65u
3-5 · 38%
EFL League 2-2.00u
0-2 · 0%
Fa Cup-2.00u
0-2 · 0%
Swiss SL-2.15u
5-8 · 38%
France Ligue Two-2.55u
1-4 · 20%
Greece Super League-2.92u
5-11 · 31%
NPB-3.00u
0-3 · 0%
DFB-Pokal-3.70u
1-5 · 17%
Ireland-4.00u
0-4 · 0%
Scotland Prem-4.25u
3-8 · 27%
NFL-4.84u
21-23 · 48%
Austria Bund.-4.90u
1-6 · 14%
Italy Serie B-5.98u
8-17 · 32%
MiLB-6.32u
125-119 · 51%
Uefa Champs League-6.45u
3-10 · 23%
2. Bundesliga-6.80u
1-8 · 11%
EFL Champ-7.19u
10-18 · 36%
Spain Segunda Division-8.12u
6-16 · 27%
Superliga-8.15u
5-14 · 26%
La Liga-10.90u
5-18 · 22%
Brazil Série B-11.47u
8-22 · 27%
🔒 Zeus Locks-102.58u
572-629 · 48%
MLB-137.42u
1423-1219 · 54%
+ 27 sports awaiting first settled bet
UFC/MMAATP TennisWTA TennisKBOChina SLUCL QualAussie Rules AFLLacrosse PLLRussia PremSudamericanaNRLLiga MXGermany Liga3NBA SLNFL PreTurkey Super LeagueSaudi Arabia Pro LeagueRugbyleague NrlwCricket International T20Cricket The HundredCricket OdiCricket The Hundred WomensLibertadoresCricket Test MatchAussierules AflwCricket Caribbean Premier LeagueWorld Cup
By bet type · lifetime P&L
Net and record are lifetime. Each bar chart is the last 7 days.14 bet types, biggest net first
Game ML+9.21u
118-114 · 51%
Spread+5.34u
34-29 · 54%
Game Total-110.22u
381-519 · 42%
Props-98.91u
1116-880 · 56%
Draw+9.40u
20-41 · 33%
F3 Total+3.44u
67-54 · 55%
F5 Total+5.08u
64-57 · 53%
F3 ML+5.08u
36-35 · 51%
F5 ML-2.26u
15-24 · 38%
F1 Total-3.61u
17-18 · 49%
1Q Spread+0.67u
1-0 · 100%
1Q Total-0.13u
1-1 · 50%
1H Spread-1.00u
0-1 · 0%
1H Total+0.89u
1-0 · 100%
+ 9 bet types awaiting first settled bet
1H ML2Q Spread4Q Total2Q Total3Q Spread4Q Spread2H Spread2H Total3Q Total
Today
+12.7u
122-80 · 5 live
Avg line value
+2.55pp
vs a sharp reference book, at pick time · not a demonstrated edge
Green / red days
10 / 28
Tracked / logged
15987
of 54162 logged
Tracked & auto-graded against official league and licensed feed results · not financial advice.
🔒 Locks record
572-629
48% win · -8.5% ROI
Locks / Leans / Fades
2910 / 1859 / 11008
Zeus calls
Reviewed
15777
bets judged
Zeus Locks — cumulative P&L
+23.51u-104.58u0-102.58u
Zeus is the MIDAS analyst — it reviews every tracked bet. Locks = strong plays, Leans = close calls, Fades = pass. If the Locks beat the Fades over time, Zeus is adding real value. Sections below are today's plays — past Zeus bets are in History (filter by Locks / Leans / Fades).
Showing Zeus's latest reviewed slate — today.
📊Zeus's record by sportwhere the Locks actually win
SportW-LWin%Units
🥊 Combat0-0—+0.0u1 live
UFC/MMA0-0—+0.0u1 live
🏀 Basketball1-614%-4.7u
WNBA1-614%-4.7u
🏈 Football 3 leagues10-2429%-7.0u2 live
CFL2-167%+0.8u
Americanfootball Ncaaf Fcs7-847%-1.8u
NCAAF1-156%-6.0u2 live
⚽ Soccer 40 leagues204-28642%-24.2u6 live
Eredivisie9-469%+9.0u
Bundesliga10-377%+8.7u
MLS20-2347%+8.6u1 live
Argentina22-2349%+8.4u1 live
Portugal Primeira Liga11-665%+6.4u1 live
Eliteserien5-271%+3.9u
Allsvenskan7-654%+3.8u
Ligue 17-558%+3.5u
Serie A9-853%+2.7u
Belgium 1st4-267%+2.5u
Korea Kleague15-362%+2.4u
EFL Cup4-357%+1.5u
Veikkausliiga2-167%+1.5u
EFL League 110-1148%+1.4u
Concacaf Leagues Cup1-0100%+1.2u
Superettan5-550%+1.1u
Brasileirão6-650%+1.0u
Poland Ekstraklasa3-443%-0.5u
Chile Primera4-544%-0.5u
DFB-Pokal1-233%-0.7u
Italy Coppa Italia0-10%-1.0u
Fa Cup0-10%-1.0u
Uefa Champs League Women0-10%-1.0u
Swiss SL5-742%-1.2u
EPL6-1332%-1.2u1 live
France Ligue Two1-325%-1.6u
Japan J League3-538%-1.6u
EFL League 20-20%-2.0u
Scotland Prem3-730%-3.2u
Uefa Champs League3-730%-3.5u
Ireland0-40%-4.0u
Austria Bund.1-614%-4.9u
EFL Champ9-1636%-6.2u1 live
Italy Serie B6-1332%-6.3u
Greece Super League3-1023%-6.4u
2. Bundesliga1-811%-6.8u
Superliga5-1328%-7.2u
Spain Segunda Division4-1324%-8.2u1 live
La Liga3-1418%-10.2u
Brazil Série B6-2023%-12.7u
⚾ Baseball 4 leagues357-313-253%-66.7u15 live
KBO0-0—+0.0u3 live
MiLB4-450%-0.0u
NPB0-30%-3.0u12 live
MLB353-306-254%-63.7u
🔒Zeus's Locks · today⇄ 13 prefer alt2910 calls · 572-629 · 48% win · -8.5% ROI · 17 live⇄ 13 of these have a preferred alt — tap to see
📋 Tokyo Yakult Swallows home vs Hiroshima Toyo Carp.
▸Game Total1 bet · 1 awaiting result🕒 2:00 AMOVER 7.5+110@Caesars~47.6%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt over 6.5 for cushion1ushop +7.5pp+5.5pp vs fairpending◆ MIDAS
NPB — OVER 7.5. Market read: pickem underdog (+110, ~48% implied). Your best price +110 @ Caesars is 7.5pp better than the sharp ref -123. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -123 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 90): Your 110@Caesars vs a sharp -123 — +5.5pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 48%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+5.5pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is OVER 7.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: over 6.5 for cushion
NPBOVERSHOP_VALUE
▸Yomiuri Giants@Yokohama DeNA BayStarsFINAL2:00 AMO/U1 bet
📋 Yokohama DeNA BayStars home vs Yomiuri Giants.
▸Game Total1 bet · 1 awaiting result🕒 2:00 AMUNDER 6.5+100@Caesars~50.0%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt under 7 for cushion1ushop +6.1pp+4.0pp vs fairpending◆ MIDAS
NPB — UNDER 6.5. Market read: pickem underdog (+100, ~50% implied). Your best price +100 @ Caesars is 6.1pp better than the sharp ref -128. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -128 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 88): Your 100@Caesars vs a sharp -128 — +4.0pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 50%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+4.0pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is UNDER 6.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: under 7 for cushion
NPBUNDERSHOP_VALUE
▸Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks@Orix BuffaloesFINAL2:00 AMO/U1 bet
📋 Orix Buffaloes home vs Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks.
▸Game Total1 bet · 1 awaiting result🕒 2:00 AMUNDER 6.5+105@Caesars~48.8%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt under 7 for cushion1ushop +5.6pp+3.5pp vs fairpending◆ MIDAS
NPB — UNDER 6.5. Market read: pickem underdog (+105, ~49% implied). Your best price +105 @ Caesars is 5.6pp better than the sharp ref -119. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -119 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 85): Your 105@Caesars vs a sharp -119 — +3.5pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 49%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+3.5pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is UNDER 6.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: under 7 for cushion
NPBUNDERSHOP_VALUE
▸Chunichi Dragons@Hanshin TigersFINAL2:00 AMO/U1 bet
📋 Hanshin Tigers home vs Chunichi Dragons.
▸Game Total1 bet · 1 awaiting result🕒 2:00 AMUNDER 6.5-115@Caesars~53.5%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt under 7 for cushion1ushop +4.3pp+2.1pp vs fairpending◆ MIDAS
NPB — UNDER 6.5. Market read: pickem favorite (-115, ~53% implied). Your best price -115 @ Caesars is 4.3pp better than the sharp ref -137. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -137 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 75): Your -115@Caesars vs a sharp -137 — +2.1pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 54%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+2.1pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is UNDER 6.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: under 7 for cushion
▸Game Total1 bet · 10100%+1.2u+120%finalOVER 3.5+120@BetMGM~45.5%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt over 3 for cushion1ushop +9.5pp+7.2pp vs fairW +1.20u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Tottenham Hotspur 1 @ Liverpool 3 · total 4
EFL Cup — OVER 3.5. Market read: dog underdog (+120, ~45% implied). Your best price +120 @ BetMGM is 9.5pp better than the sharp ref -122. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -122 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 90): Your 120@BetMGM vs a sharp -122 — +7.2pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 46%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+7.2pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is OVER 3.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: over 3 for cushion
EFL CupOVERSHOP_VALUE
▸Arsenal@Ipswich TownFINAL12:00 PMO/U0-1-1.00u
📋 Ipswich Town home vs Arsenal.
▸Game Total1 bet · 010%-1.0u-100%finalUNDER 2.5+115@BetMGM~46.5%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt under 3 for cushion1ushop +8.4pp+6.2pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Arsenal 4 @ Ipswich Town 2 · total 6
EFL Cup — UNDER 2.5. Market read: pickem underdog (+115, ~47% implied). Your best price +115 @ BetMGM is 8.4pp better than the sharp ref -122. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -122 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 90): Your 115@BetMGM vs a sharp -122 — +6.2pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 46%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+6.2pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is UNDER 2.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: under 3 for cushion
▸Game Total1 bet · 10100%+1.2u+125%finalOVER 3.5+125@BetMGM~44.4%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt over 3 for cushion1ushop +9.5pp+6.8pp vs fairW +1.25u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Östers IF 3 @ IFK Värnamo 1 · total 4
Superettan — OVER 3.5. Market read: dog underdog (+125, ~44% implied). Your best price +125 @ BetMGM is 9.5pp better than the sharp ref -117. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -116 @ betus is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 90): Your 125@BetMGM vs a sharp -117 — +6.8pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 44%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+6.8pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is OVER 3.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: over 3 for cushion
SuperettanOVERSHOP_VALUE
▸Sandvikens IF@IK BrageFINAL10:00 AMO/U1-0+1.20u
📋 IK Brage home vs Sandvikens IF.
▸Game Total1 bet · 10100%+1.2u+120%finalUNDER 2.5+120@BetMGM~45.5%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt under 3 for cushion1ushop +9.5pp+6.8pp vs fairW +1.20u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Sandvikens IF 1 @ IK Brage 1 · total 2
Superettan — UNDER 2.5. Market read: dog underdog (+120, ~45% implied). Your best price +120 @ BetMGM is 9.5pp better than the sharp ref -122. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -121 @ betus is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 90): Your 120@BetMGM vs a sharp -122 — +6.8pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 46%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+6.8pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is UNDER 2.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: under 3 for cushion
▸Game Total1 bet · 010%-1.0u-100%finalOVER 3.5+125@BetMGM~44.4%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt over 3 for cushion1ushop +10.3pp+8.3pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Kilmarnock 1 @ Hibernian 0 · total 1
Scotland Prem — OVER 3.5. Market read: dog underdog (+125, ~44% implied). Your best price +125 @ BetMGM is 10.3pp better than the sharp ref -121. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -121 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 90): Your 125@BetMGM vs a sharp -121 — +8.3pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 44%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+8.3pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is OVER 3.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: over 3 for cushion
▸Game Total1 bet · 010%-1.0u-100%finalUNDER 2.5+115@BetMGM~46.5%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt under 3 for cushion1ushop +8.2pp+6.2pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Millwall 2 @ Middlesbrough 2 · total 4
EFL Champ — UNDER 2.5. Our own record in EFL Champ|Game Total: 10-14 (-3.19u) — this cell has bled for us. Market read: pickem underdog (+115, ~47% implied). Your best price +115 @ BetMGM is 8.2pp better than the sharp ref -121. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -121 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 90): Your 115@BetMGM vs a sharp -121 — +6.2pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 46%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+6.2pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is UNDER 2.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: under 3 for cushion
▸Game Total1 bet · 10100%+1.2u+120%finalOVER 4.5+120@BetMGM~45.5%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt over 4 for cushion1ushop +8.5pp+6.2pp vs fairW +1.20u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Willem II 1 @ Ajax 5 · total 6
Eredivisie — OVER 4.5. Our own record in Eredivisie|Game Total: 7-6 (+2.20u) — a measured edge here. Market read: dog underdog (+120, ~45% implied). Your best price +120 @ BetMGM is 8.5pp better than the sharp ref -117. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -108 @ lowvig is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 90): Your 120@BetMGM vs a sharp -117 — +6.2pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 46%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+6.2pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is OVER 4.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: over 4 for cushion
EredivisieOVERSHOP_VALUERESEARCH
Italy Coppa Italia1bet010%-1.0u-100%▸Pisa@FiorentinaFINAL12:00 PMO/U0-1-1.00u
📋 Fiorentina home vs Pisa.
▸Game Total1 bet · 010%-1.0u-100%finalUNDER 2.5+130@BetMGM~43.5%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt under 3 for cushion1.5ushop +23.6pp+18.2pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Pisa 0 @ Fiorentina 3 · total 3
Italy Coppa Italia — UNDER 2.5. Market read: dog underdog (+130, ~43% implied). Your best price +130 @ BetMGM is 23.6pp better than the sharp ref -204. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -175 @ onexbet is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 90): Your 130@BetMGM vs a sharp -204 — +18.2pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 44%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+18.2pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is UNDER 2.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: under 3 for cushion
▸Game Total1 bet · 10100%+1.1u+115%finalOVER 3.5+115@BetMGM~46.5%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt over 3 for cushion1ushop +4.2pp+2.3pp vs fairW +1.15u◆ MIDAS
Settled on FC Sion 5 @ Grasshopper Zürich 2 · total 7
Swiss SL — OVER 3.5. Market read: pickem underdog (+115, ~47% implied). Your best price +115 @ BetMGM is 4.2pp better than the sharp ref -103. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -103 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 76): Your 115@BetMGM vs a sharp -103 — +2.3pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 46%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+2.3pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is OVER 3.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: over 3 for cushion
🚫Zeus's Fades · today (skip)11008 calls · 790-815 · 49% win · -3.0% ROI · 74 live
⚾ Baseball6bets2340%-1.2u-25%1 liveMLB6bets2340%-1.2u-25%1 live▸Miami Marlins@Arizona DiamondbacksLIVE6:40 PMML1 bet
📋 Arizona Diamondbacks home vs Miami Marlins · Probables: Ryan Gusto (RHP, 4.14 ERA) (Marlins) @ Merrill Kelly (RHP, 4.97 ERA) (Diamondbacks).
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game ML1 bets · ⚡ 1 live🕒 6:40 PMArizona Diamondbacks ML-135@Caesars~57.4%Game MLZeus PASSshop +1.6pp+0.1pp vs fairpendingUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
MLB — Arizona Diamondbacks ML. Starting pitcher disadvantage: our SP 4.97 ERA vs 4.14 — the biggest single input in a baseball game. Home side — a small, real edge across sports. Our own record in MLB|Game ML: 43-35 (+1.21u) — a measured edge here. MOD_FAV band is 60-39 (+4.89u) on our book. Market read: mod fav favorite (-135, ~57% implied). Your best price -135 @ Caesars is 1.6pp better than the sharp ref -144. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
Zeus PASS (conf 58): Your -135@Caesars vs a sharp -144 — +0.1pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 57%. No line-shopping edge and no situational reason on this moneyline — it's a vig-paying coin flip. Pass.
+0.1pp vs fairmoneylineedge too thin
⚠ risk: little/no edge — skip it
MLBML_FAVMOD_FAVSHOP_VALUERESEARCH
▸Kansas City Royals@Houston AstrosFINAL5:10 PMO/U1-0+1.17u
📋 Houston Astros home vs Kansas City Royals · Probables: Daniel Lynch IV (LHP, 3.52 ERA) (Royals) @ Cristian Javier (RHP, 5.50 ERA) (Astros) · Weather: 86°F, wind 8mph, 5% precip (retract roof).
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game Total1 bets · 10100%+1.2u+117%finalUNDER 7.5+117@Caesars~46.1%Game TotalZeus PASSshop +7.0pp+5.2pp vs fairW +1.17uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Kansas City Royals 2 @ Houston Astros 4 · total 6
MLB — UNDER 7.5. Leans UNDER: on your own settled record UNDERs hit 58% vs overs 45% — a real, measured market bias. Our own record in MLB|Game Total: 90-132 (-42.43u) — this cell has bled for us. We're 4-6 (-2.56u) backing Houston Astros — they have cost us. Market read: pickem underdog (+117, ~46% implied). Your best price +117 @ Caesars is 7.0pp better than the sharp ref -113. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
Zeus PASS (conf 58): Your 117@Caesars vs a sharp -113 — +5.2pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 46%. This total is a market we have demoted while we keep grading it. We are not putting a number on it.
+5.2pp vs fairtotaledge too thin
⚠ risk: little/no edge — skip it
MLBUNDERSHOP_VALUERESEARCH
▸San Francisco Giants@St. Louis CardinalsFINAL4:45 PMO/U0-1-1.00u
📋 St. Louis Cardinals home vs San Francisco Giants · Probables: Blade Tidwell (RHP, 4.56 ERA) (Giants) @ Andre Pallante (RHP, 3.70 ERA) (Cardinals).
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game Total1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalUNDER 8.5-110@BetMGM~52.4%Game TotalZeus PASS-1.0pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on San Francisco Giants 10 @ St. Louis Cardinals 3 · total 13
MLB — UNDER 8.5. Leans UNDER: on your own settled record UNDERs hit 58% vs overs 45% — a real, measured market bias. Our own record in MLB|Game Total: 90-132 (-42.43u) — this cell has bled for us. We're 10-5 (+7.48u) backing St. Louis Cardinals — they have paid us. Market read: pickem favorite (-110, ~52% implied). Your best price -110 @ BetMGM is 0.7pp better than the sharp ref -113. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
Zeus PASS (conf 65): Your -110@BetMGM vs a sharp -113 — -1.0pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 52%. This total is a market we have demoted while we keep grading it. We are not putting a number on it.
-1.0pp vs fairtotaledge too thin
⚠ risk: little/no edge — skip it
MLBUNDERRESEARCH
▸New York Yankees@Minnesota TwinsFINAL4:40 PMML1-0+0.59u
📋 Minnesota Twins home vs New York Yankees · Probables: Max Fried (LHP, 2.63 ERA) (Yankees) @ Bailey Ober (RHP, 4.32 ERA) (Twins).
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game ML1 bets · 10100%+0.6u+59%finalNew York Yankees ML-170@Caesars~63.0%Game MLZeus PASS-1.3pp vs fairW +0.59uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on New York Yankees 8 @ Minnesota Twins 1
MLB — New York Yankees ML. Starting pitcher edge: our SP 2.73 ERA vs 4.28 — the biggest single input in a baseball game. Our own record in MLB|Game ML: 43-35 (+1.21u) — a measured edge here. MOD_FAV band is 60-39 (+4.89u) on our book. Market read: mod fav favorite (-170, ~63% implied). Your best price -170 @ Caesars ≈ sharp ref -172 (no shopping edge). (Global best -158 @ draftkings is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
Zeus PASS (conf 67): Your -170@Caesars vs a sharp -172 — -1.3pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 63%. No line-shopping edge and no situational reason on this moneyline — it's a vig-paying coin flip. Pass.
📋 Chicago Cubs home vs Atlanta Braves · Probables: Martín Pérez (LHP, 3.07 ERA) (Braves) @ Kevin Gausman (RHP, 4.55 ERA) (Cubs).
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game Total1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalUNDER 8.5-110@Caesars~52.4%Game TotalZeus PASS-2.4pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Atlanta Braves 6 @ Chicago Cubs 3 · total 9
MLB — UNDER 8.5. Leans UNDER: on your own settled record UNDERs hit 58% vs overs 45% — a real, measured market bias. Our own record in MLB|Game Total: 90-132 (-42.43u) — this cell has bled for us. We're 4-7 (-3.36u) backing Chicago Cubs — they have cost us. Market read: pickem favorite (-110, ~52% implied). Your best price -110 @ Caesars ≈ sharp ref -110 (no shopping edge). (Global best -104 @ onexbet is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
Zeus PASS (conf 75): Your -110@Caesars vs a sharp -110 — -2.4pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 52%. This total is a market we have demoted while we keep grading it. We are not putting a number on it.
-2.4pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: little/no edge — skip it
MLBUNDERRESEARCH
▸Baltimore Orioles@New York MetsFINAL4:10 PMO/U0-1-1.00u
📋 New York Mets home vs Baltimore Orioles · Probables: Shane Baz (RHP, 4.11 ERA) (Orioles) @ Sean Manaea (LHP, 4.74 ERA) (Mets).
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game Total1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalUNDER 7.5+109@Caesars~47.8%Game TotalZeus PASSshop +3.8pp+2.1pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Baltimore Orioles 7 @ New York Mets 5 · total 12
MLB — UNDER 7.5. Leans UNDER: on your own settled record UNDERs hit 58% vs overs 45% — a real, measured market bias. Our own record in MLB|Game Total: 90-132 (-42.43u) — this cell has bled for us. We're 10-2 (+8.73u) backing New York Mets — they have paid us. Market read: pickem underdog (+109, ~48% implied). Your best price +109 @ Caesars is 3.8pp better than the sharp ref -107. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -107 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus PASS (conf 58): Your 109@Caesars vs a sharp -107 — +2.1pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 48%. This total is a market we have demoted while we keep grading it. We are not putting a number on it.
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Draw1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalDraw+300@BetMGM~25.0%DrawZeus PASSshop +1.2pp-0.0pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Tottenham Hotspur 1 @ Liverpool 3
EFL Cup — Draw. LONGSHOT band is 13-48 (+5.15u) on our book. Market read: longshot underdog (+300, ~25% implied). Your best price +300 @ BetMGM is 1.2pp better than the sharp ref +282. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best +310 @ betvictor is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
Zeus PASS (conf 58): Your 300@BetMGM vs a sharp 282 — level with the de-vigged fair price. Implied 25%. No line-shopping edge and no situational reason on this draw — it's a vig-paying coin flip. Pass.
-0.0pp vs fairdrawedge too thin
⚠ risk: little/no edge — skip it
EFL CupML_DRAWLONGSHOTSHOP_VALUERESEARCH
▸Arsenal@Ipswich TownFINAL12:00 PMDraw0-1-1.00u
📋 Ipswich Town home vs Arsenal.
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Draw1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalDraw+425@BetMGM~19.0%DrawZeus PASSshop +1.2pp+0.2pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Arsenal 4 @ Ipswich Town 2
EFL Cup — Draw. LONGSHOT band is 13-48 (+5.15u) on our book. Market read: longshot underdog (+425, ~19% implied). Your best price +425 @ BetMGM is 1.2pp better than the sharp ref +393. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
Zeus PASS (conf 58): Your 425@BetMGM vs a sharp 393 — +0.2pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 19%. No line-shopping edge and no situational reason on this draw — it's a vig-paying coin flip. Pass.
+0.2pp vs fairdrawlongshot — high varianceedge too thin
⚠ risk: little/no edge — skip it
EFL CupML_DRAWLONGSHOTSHOP_VALUERESEARCH
La Liga1bet010%-1.0u-100%▸Valencia@AlavésFINAL11:00 AMO/U0-1-1.00u
📋 Alavés home vs Valencia.
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game Total1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalOVER 2.5+120@BetMGM~45.5%Game TotalZeus PASSshop +4.8pp+3.4pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Valencia 1 @ Alavés 0 · total 1
La Liga — OVER 2.5. Our own record in La Liga|Game Total: 4-15 (-10.00u) — this cell has bled for us. Market read: dog underdog (+120, ~45% implied). Your best price +120 @ BetMGM is 4.8pp better than the sharp ref -101. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -101 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus PASS (conf 58): Your 120@BetMGM vs a sharp -101 — +3.4pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 46%. This total is a market we have demoted while we keep grading it. We are not putting a number on it.
+3.4pp vs fairtotaledge too thin
⚠ risk: little/no edge — skip it
La LigaOVERSHOP_VALUERESEARCH
Calendar · day-by-day, by market
July 2026
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
170 live
180 live
190 live
200 live
210 live
220 live
230 live
240 live
250 live
260 live
270 live
280 live
290 live
300 live
310 live
August 2026
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
10 live
20 live
30 live
40 live
50 live
60 live
70 live
80 live
930-28-2.5u
1015-15+1.0u
1127-16+8.5u
129-11-2.3u
138-5+2.3u
1415-8+6.5u
158-14-6.1u
167-9-2.1u
175-5-0.4u
1816-9+8.0u
1910-11-0.9u
202-4-1.6u
212-6-3.8u
2224-24+28.6u
23147-145-16.7u
2420-22+2.8u
250-6-6.0u
261-5-3.8u
272-4-1.7u
281-5-3.8u
291-5-3.8u
300-5-5.0u
311-5-3.9u
September 2026
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
1129-105-8.7u
2113-92-1.9u
392-73-2.2u
4110-89-4.1u
5142-157-27.0u
6101-83+8.0u
730-38-11.7u
8108-93-6.9u
9141-146-40.3u
1041-45-15.2u
1182-90-25.0u
12124-150-37.0u
1398-86+0.0u
1487-79-10.7u
15122-80+12.7u
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
green dayred daytap a day to see its bets
Today's board · 2026-09-15 · every bot's plays, one feed
Every bot's plays, one feedSearch it, filter by bot, or show only what several bots agree on. The curated three
live on Best 3.
AllUpcomingLiveFinal
High consensus
MLB 188MiLB 23EFL Cup 6NPB 4Superettan 2EFL Champ 2La Liga 2Scotland Prem 1Eredivisie 1Swiss SL 1Italy Coppa Italia 1Brazil Série B 1
How this board works
Every strategy bot's plays in one feed. Each pick shows how many bots are on it, so more bots means
stronger consensus. Tap a bot tag to see that bot's own record.
Tap the + on any bet to add it to your personal tracker and bankroll.
Settled and past bets live in Calendar and History.
⚾ Baseball3 leagues215bets11570262%+14.4u+8%5 live23 no resultMLB188bets10658265%+18.9u+11%1 live21 no result▸Miami Marlins@Arizona DiamondbacksLIVE6:40 PMML15 props16 bets
📋 Arizona Diamondbacks home vs Miami Marlins · Probables: Ryan Gusto (RHP, 4.14 ERA) (Marlins) @ Merrill Kelly (RHP, 4.97 ERA) (Diamondbacks).
▸Props6 bets · 40100%+2.0u+51%2 no result
Miami Marlins310100%+0.4u+40%2 no result
finalJakob Marsee UNDER 0.5 RBIs-250@BetMGM~71.4%Props1.5ushop +6.8pp+3.8pp vs fairW +0.40u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Jakob Marsee: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Jakob Marsee UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Miami Marlins @ Arizona Diamondbacks). Market -250 (~71% implied). Your best price -250 @ BetMGM is 6.8pp better than the sharp ref -359. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
finalJoe Mack UNDER 0.5 RBIs-275@BetMGM~73.3%Props1ushop +5.8pp+2.7pp vs fairno result◆ MIDAS
Void voided in the ledger (no result ever arrived)
MLB player prop — Joe Mack UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Miami Marlins @ Arizona Diamondbacks). Market -275 (~73% implied). Your best price -275 @ BetMGM is 5.7pp better than the sharp ref -378. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
finalXavier Edwards UNDER 0.5 RBIs-275@BetMGM~73.3%Props1ushop +5.2pp+2.1pp vs fairno result◆ MIDAS
Void voided in the ledger (no result ever arrived)
MLB player prop — Xavier Edwards UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Miami Marlins @ Arizona Diamondbacks). Market -275 (~73% implied). Your best price -275 @ BetMGM is 5.2pp better than the sharp ref -365. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
Arizona Diamondbacks220100%+1.3u+65%
finalMichael Soroka UNDER 4.5 Hits Allowed-120@BetMGM~54.5%Props1ushop +3.6pp+4.7pp vs fairW +0.83u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Michael Soroka: 2 pit_H (line 4.5)
MLB player prop — Michael Soroka UNDER 4.5 Hits Allowed (Miami Marlins @ Arizona Diamondbacks). Market -120 (~55% implied). Your best price -120 @ BetMGM is 3.6pp better than the sharp ref -139. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HASHOP_VALUE
finalGeraldo Perdomo UNDER 0.5 RBIs-210@BetMGM~67.7%Props1ushop +4.9pp+2.0pp vs fairW +0.48u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Geraldo Perdomo: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Geraldo Perdomo UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Miami Marlins @ Arizona Diamondbacks). Market -210 (~68% implied). Your best price -210 @ BetMGM is 4.9pp better than the sharp ref -266. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
Team not identified110100%+0.3u+34%
finalPavin Smith UNDER 0.5 RBIs-295@BetMGM~74.7%Props1ushop +6.1pp+3.1pp vs fairW +0.34u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Pavin Smith: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Pavin Smith UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Miami Marlins @ Arizona Diamondbacks). Market -295 (~75% implied). Your best price -295 @ BetMGM is 6.1pp better than the sharp ref -420. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game ML1 bets · ⚡ 1 live🕒 6:40 PMArizona Diamondbacks ML-135@Caesars~57.4%Game MLZeus PASSshop +1.6pp+0.1pp vs fairpendingUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
MLB — Arizona Diamondbacks ML. Starting pitcher disadvantage: our SP 4.97 ERA vs 4.14 — the biggest single input in a baseball game. Home side — a small, real edge across sports. Our own record in MLB|Game ML: 43-35 (+1.21u) — a measured edge here. MOD_FAV band is 60-39 (+4.89u) on our book. Market read: mod fav favorite (-135, ~57% implied). Your best price -135 @ Caesars is 1.6pp better than the sharp ref -144. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
Zeus PASS (conf 58): Your -135@Caesars vs a sharp -144 — +0.1pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 57%. No line-shopping edge and no situational reason on this moneyline — it's a vig-paying coin flip. Pass.
+0.1pp vs fairmoneylineedge too thin
⚠ risk: little/no edge — skip it
MLBML_FAVMOD_FAVSHOP_VALUERESEARCH
▸Props9 bets · 6275%+4.3u+53%1 no resultfinalJavier Sanoja UNDER 0.5 Hits+175@BetMGM~36.4%Propsshop +3.3pp+3.6pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Javier Sanoja: 1 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Javier Sanoja UNDER 0.5 Hits (Miami Marlins @ Arizona Diamondbacks). Market +175 (~36% implied). Your best price +175 @ BetMGM is 3.3pp better than the sharp ref +152. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalJoe Mack UNDER 0.5 Hits+115@BetMGM~46.5%Propsshop +3.7pp+3.3pp vs fairno resultUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Void voided in the ledger (no result ever arrived)
MLB player prop — Joe Mack UNDER 0.5 Hits (Miami Marlins @ Arizona Diamondbacks). Market +115 (~47% implied). Your best price +115 @ BetMGM is 3.7pp better than the sharp ref -101. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalJakob Marsee UNDER 0.5 Hits+140@BetMGM~41.7%Propsshop +3.4pp+3.2pp vs fairW +1.40uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Jakob Marsee: 0 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Jakob Marsee UNDER 0.5 Hits (Miami Marlins @ Arizona Diamondbacks). Market +140 (~42% implied). Your best price +140 @ BetMGM is 3.4pp better than the sharp ref +122. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalJakob Marsee UNDER 0.5 Runs-200@BetMGM~66.7%Propsshop +3.8pp+2.6pp vs fairW +0.50uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Jakob Marsee: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Jakob Marsee UNDER 0.5 Runs (Miami Marlins @ Arizona Diamondbacks). Market -200 (~67% implied). Your best price -200 @ BetMGM is 3.8pp better than the sharp ref -239. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalLars Nootbaar UNDER 0.5 Hits+180@BetMGM~35.7%Propsshop +4.9pp+5.1pp vs fairW +1.80uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Lars Nootbaar: 0 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Lars Nootbaar UNDER 0.5 Hits (Miami Marlins @ Arizona Diamondbacks). Market +180 (~36% implied). Your best price +180 @ BetMGM is 4.9pp better than the sharp ref +146. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalPavin Smith UNDER 0.5 Hits+120@BetMGM~45.5%Propsshop +5.5pp+5.0pp vs fairW +1.20uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Pavin Smith: 0 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Pavin Smith UNDER 0.5 Hits (Miami Marlins @ Arizona Diamondbacks). Market +120 (~45% implied). Your best price +120 @ BetMGM is 5.5pp better than the sharp ref -104. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalPavin Smith UNDER 0.5 Runs-190@BetMGM~65.5%Propsshop +5.1pp+3.8pp vs fairW +0.53uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Pavin Smith: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Pavin Smith UNDER 0.5 Runs (Miami Marlins @ Arizona Diamondbacks). Market -190 (~66% implied). Your best price -190 @ BetMGM is 5.1pp better than the sharp ref -240. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalLars Nootbaar UNDER 0.5 Runs-120@BetMGM~54.5%Propsshop +4.3pp+3.6pp vs fairW +0.83uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Lars Nootbaar: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Lars Nootbaar UNDER 0.5 Runs (Miami Marlins @ Arizona Diamondbacks). Market -120 (~55% implied). Your best price -120 @ BetMGM is 4.3pp better than the sharp ref -143. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalGriffin Conine UNDER 0.5 Runs-155@BetMGM~60.8%Propsshop +3.8pp+2.8pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Griffin Conine: 1 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Griffin Conine UNDER 0.5 Runs (Miami Marlins @ Arizona Diamondbacks). Market -155 (~61% implied). Your best price -155 @ BetMGM is 3.8pp better than the sharp ref -182. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
▸Seattle Mariners@Los Angeles AngelsFINAL6:38 PM13 propsF5 Total13-0+7.77u
📋 Los Angeles Angels home vs Seattle Mariners · Probables: George Kirby (RHP, 4.25 ERA) (Mariners) @ Yusei Kikuchi (LHP, 4.75 ERA) (Angels).
▸Props6 bets · 60100%+2.9u+48%
Seattle Mariners330100%+1.2u+41%
finalLazaro Montes UNDER 0.5 RBIs-235@BetMGM~70.1%Props1ushop +5.6pp+2.6pp vs fairW +0.43u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Lazaro Montes: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Lazaro Montes UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Seattle Mariners @ Los Angeles Angels). Market -235 (~70% implied). Your best price -235 @ BetMGM is 5.6pp better than the sharp ref -313. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
finalJosh Naylor UNDER 0.5 RBIs-225@BetMGM~69.2%Props1ushop +5.6pp+2.6pp vs fairW +0.44u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Josh Naylor: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Josh Naylor UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Seattle Mariners @ Los Angeles Angels). Market -225 (~69% implied). Your best price -225 @ BetMGM is 5.6pp better than the sharp ref -298. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
finalJ.P. Crawford UNDER 0.5 RBIs-275@BetMGM~73.3%Props1ushop +5.1pp+2.1pp vs fairW +0.36u◆ MIDAS
Settled on J.P. Crawford: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — J.P. Crawford UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Seattle Mariners @ Los Angeles Angels). Market -275 (~73% implied). Your best price -275 @ BetMGM is 5.1pp better than the sharp ref -364. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
Los Angeles Angels330100%+1.6u+55%
finalRyan Johnson UNDER 2.5 Earned Runs-105@BetMGM~51.2%Props1ushop +4.1pp+2.4pp vs fairW +0.95u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Ryan Johnson: 1 pit_ER (line 2.5)
MLB player prop — Ryan Johnson UNDER 2.5 Earned Runs (Seattle Mariners @ Los Angeles Angels). Market -105 (~51% implied). Your best price -105 @ BetMGM is 4.1pp better than the sharp ref -124. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_ERSHOP_VALUE
finalWade Meckler UNDER 0.5 RBIs-350@BetMGM~77.8%Props1ushop +5.3pp+2.3pp vs fairW +0.29u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Wade Meckler: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Wade Meckler UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Seattle Mariners @ Los Angeles Angels). Market -350 (~78% implied). Your best price -350 @ BetMGM is 5.3pp better than the sharp ref -491. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
finalMike Trout UNDER 0.5 RBIs-250@BetMGM~71.4%Props1ushop +5.1pp+2.1pp vs fairW +0.40u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Mike Trout: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Mike Trout UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Seattle Mariners @ Los Angeles Angels). Market -250 (~71% implied). Your best price -250 @ BetMGM is 5.1pp better than the sharp ref -326. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Props7 bets · 60100%+3.9u+64%1 no resultfinalBrock Rodden UNDER 0.5 Hits+100@BetMGM~50.0%Propsshop +5.2pp+4.3pp vs fairW +1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Brock Rodden: 0 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Brock Rodden UNDER 0.5 Hits (Seattle Mariners @ Los Angeles Angels). Market +100 (~50% implied). Your best price +100 @ BetMGM is 5.2pp better than the sharp ref -123. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalBrock Rodden UNDER 0.5 Runs-200@BetMGM~66.7%Propsshop +4.9pp+3.6pp vs fairW +0.50uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Brock Rodden: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Brock Rodden UNDER 0.5 Runs (Seattle Mariners @ Los Angeles Angels). Market -200 (~67% implied). Your best price -200 @ BetMGM is 4.9pp better than the sharp ref -252. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalZach Neto UNDER 0.5 Runs-145@BetMGM~59.2%Propsshop +3.2pp+2.4pp vs fairW +0.69uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Zach Neto: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Zach Neto UNDER 0.5 Runs (Seattle Mariners @ Los Angeles Angels). Market -145 (~59% implied). Your best price -145 @ BetMGM is 3.2pp better than the sharp ref -166. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalMike Trout UNDER 0.5 Runs-150@BetMGM~60.0%Propsshop +3.4pp+2.4pp vs fairW +0.67uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Mike Trout: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Mike Trout UNDER 0.5 Runs (Seattle Mariners @ Los Angeles Angels). Market -150 (~60% implied). Your best price -150 @ BetMGM is 3.4pp better than the sharp ref -173. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalChristian Moore UNDER 0.5 Runs-235@BetMGM~70.1%Propsshop +3.7pp+2.3pp vs fairW +0.43uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Christian Moore: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Christian Moore UNDER 0.5 Runs (Seattle Mariners @ Los Angeles Angels). Market -235 (~70% implied). Your best price -235 @ BetMGM is 3.7pp better than the sharp ref -282. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalJose Siri UNDER 0.5 Runs-235@BetMGM~70.1%Propsshop +4.4pp+3.0pp vs fairno resultUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Jose Siri: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Jose Siri UNDER 0.5 Runs (Seattle Mariners @ Los Angeles Angels). Market -235 (~70% implied). Your best price -235 @ BetMGM is 4.4pp better than the sharp ref -293. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalLazaro Montes UNDER 0.5 Runs-175@BetMGM~63.6%Propsshop +3.5pp+2.3pp vs fairW +0.57uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Lazaro Montes: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Lazaro Montes UNDER 0.5 Runs (Seattle Mariners @ Los Angeles Angels). Market -175 (~64% implied). Your best price -175 @ BetMGM is 3.5pp better than the sharp ref -204. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
▸F5 Total1 bets · 10100%+1.1u+105%finalF5 UNDER 4.0+105@Caesars~48.8%F5 Total+1.1pp vs fairW +1.05uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Seattle Mariners 1 @ Los Angeles Angels 2 · total 3
MLB FIRST 5 INNINGS segment — F5 UNDER 4.0. Market: +105 (~49% implied). Your best price +105 @ Caesars ≈ sharp ref +105.
MLBPERIODF5
▸San Diego Padres@Colorado RockiesFINAL5:40 PM12 propsF3 TotalF5 MLF5 TotalF1 Total7-8-2.22u
📋 Colorado Rockies home vs San Diego Padres · Probables: Robbie Ray (LHP, 3.57 ERA) (Padres) @ Mason Adams (RHP, 3.38 ERA) (Rockies).
▸Props6 bets · 4267%+1.0u+16%
San Diego Padres220100%+1.6u+80%
finalTy France UNDER 0.5 RBIs-125@BetMGM~55.6%Props1ushop +4.9pp+2.6pp vs fairW +0.80u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Ty France: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Ty France UNDER 0.5 RBIs (San Diego Padres @ Colorado Rockies). Market -125 (~56% implied). Your best price -125 @ BetMGM is 4.9pp better than the sharp ref -153. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
finalJackson Merrill UNDER 0.5 RBIs-125@BetMGM~55.6%Props1ushop +4.6pp+2.2pp vs fairW +0.80u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Jackson Merrill: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Jackson Merrill UNDER 0.5 RBIs (San Diego Padres @ Colorado Rockies). Market -125 (~56% implied). Your best price -125 @ BetMGM is 4.6pp better than the sharp ref -151. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
Colorado Rockies42250%-0.6u-16%
finalKyle Freeland UNDER 2.5 Strikeouts-110@BetMGM~52.4%Props1ushop +4.9pp+2.6pp vs fairW +0.91u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Kyle Freeland: 1 pit_K (line 2.5)
MLB player prop — Kyle Freeland UNDER 2.5 Strikeouts (San Diego Padres @ Colorado Rockies). Market -110 (~52% implied). Your best price -110 @ BetMGM is 4.9pp better than the sharp ref -134. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_KSHOP_VALUE
finalKyle Freeland UNDER 2.5 Earned Runs+105@BetMGM~48.8%Props1ushop +3.6pp+2.1pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Kyle Freeland: 3 pit_ER (line 2.5)
MLB player prop — Kyle Freeland UNDER 2.5 Earned Runs (San Diego Padres @ Colorado Rockies). Market +105 (~49% implied). Your best price +105 @ BetMGM is 3.6pp better than the sharp ref -110. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_ERSHOP_VALUE
finalKyle Karros UNDER 0.5 RBIs-225@BetMGM~69.2%Props1ushop +5.1pp+2.0pp vs fairW +0.44u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Kyle Karros: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Kyle Karros UNDER 0.5 RBIs (San Diego Padres @ Colorado Rockies). Market -225 (~69% implied). Your best price -225 @ BetMGM is 5.1pp better than the sharp ref -289. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
finalCole Carrigg UNDER 0.5 RBIs-220@BetMGM~68.8%Props1ushop +5.6pp+2.6pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Cole Carrigg: 5 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Cole Carrigg UNDER 0.5 RBIs (San Diego Padres @ Colorado Rockies). Market -220 (~69% implied). Your best price -220 @ BetMGM is 5.6pp better than the sharp ref -290. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
▸F1 Total1 bet · 010%-1.0u-100%finalNRFI (Under 0.5, 1st inning) — San Diego Padres @ Colorado Rockies+125@BetMGM~44.4%F1 Total1u+5.6pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on San Diego Padres 3 @ Colorado Rockies 9 · total 12
MLB 1ST INNING segment — NRFI (Under 0.5, 1st inning) — San Diego Padres @ Colorado Rockies. Market: +125 (~44% implied). Your best price +125 @ BetMGM ≈ sharp ref +124. NRFI is a flagged focus market — tracked every game to measure whether it's a real edge for us.
MLBPERIODNRFI
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Props6 bets · 2340%-1.2u-24%1 no resultfinalJake McCarthy UNDER 0.5 Runs-110@BetMGM~52.4%Propsshop +5.1pp+4.5pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Jake McCarthy: 1 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Jake McCarthy UNDER 0.5 Runs (San Diego Padres @ Colorado Rockies). Market -110 (~52% implied). Your best price -110 @ BetMGM is 5.1pp better than the sharp ref -135. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalXander Bogaerts UNDER 0.5 Runs+110@BetMGM~47.6%Propsshop +3.4pp+3.3pp vs fairW +1.10uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Xander Bogaerts: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Xander Bogaerts UNDER 0.5 Runs (San Diego Padres @ Colorado Rockies). Market +110 (~48% implied). Your best price +110 @ BetMGM is 3.4pp better than the sharp ref -104. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalConnor Norby UNDER 0.5 Runs-125@BetMGM~55.6%Propsshop +3.0pp+2.3pp vs fairno resultUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Void voided in the ledger (no result ever arrived)
MLB player prop — Connor Norby UNDER 0.5 Runs (San Diego Padres @ Colorado Rockies). Market -125 (~56% implied). Your best price -125 @ BetMGM is 3.0pp better than the sharp ref -141. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalCole Carrigg UNDER 0.5 Runs-140@BetMGM~58.3%Propsshop +5.3pp+4.3pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Cole Carrigg: 2 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Cole Carrigg UNDER 0.5 Runs (San Diego Padres @ Colorado Rockies). Market -140 (~58% implied). Your best price -140 @ BetMGM is 5.3pp better than the sharp ref -175. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalJake Cronenworth UNDER 0.5 Hits+200@BetMGM~33.3%Propsshop +2.5pp+3.1pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Jake Cronenworth: 1 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Jake Cronenworth UNDER 0.5 Hits (San Diego Padres @ Colorado Rockies). Market +200 (~33% implied). Your best price +200 @ BetMGM is 2.5pp better than the sharp ref +179. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalTJ Rumfield UNDER 0.5 Runs-140@BetMGM~58.3%Propsshop +3.2pp+2.3pp vs fairW +0.71uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on TJ Rumfield: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — TJ Rumfield UNDER 0.5 Runs (San Diego Padres @ Colorado Rockies). Market -140 (~58% implied). Your best price -140 @ BetMGM is 3.2pp better than the sharp ref -160. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
▸F3 Total1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalF3 UNDER 3.5-120@Caesars~54.5%F3 Totalshop +3.3pp+1.8pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on San Diego Padres 3 @ Colorado Rockies 9 · total 12
MLB FIRST 3 INNINGS segment — F3 UNDER 3.5. Market: -120 (~55% implied). Your best price -120 @ Caesars is 3.3pp better than the sharp ref -137. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPERIODF3SHOP_VALUE
▸F5 ML1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalColorado Rockies F5 ML+140@Caesars~41.7%F5 MLshop +3.0pp+0.4pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on San Diego Padres 3 @ Colorado Rockies 9 · total 12
MLB FIRST 5 INNINGS segment — Colorado Rockies F5 ML. Market: +140 (~42% implied). Your best price +140 @ Caesars is 3.0pp better than the sharp ref +124. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPERIODF5SHOP_VALUE
▸F5 Total1 bets · 10100%+1.0u+101%finalF5 UNDER 6.0no book price~49.8%F5 Total+1.0pp vs fairW +1.01uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on San Diego Padres 3 @ Colorado Rockies 9 · total 12
MLB FIRST 5 INNINGS segment — F5 UNDER 6.0. Market: +101 (~50% implied). No price at your books; sharp ref +101.
MLBPERIODF5
▸Kansas City Royals@Houston AstrosFINAL5:10 PMO/U11 props10-2+4.75u
📋 Houston Astros home vs Kansas City Royals · Probables: Daniel Lynch IV (LHP, 3.52 ERA) (Royals) @ Cristian Javier (RHP, 5.50 ERA) (Astros) · Weather: 86°F, wind 8mph, 5% precip (retract roof).
▸Props6 bets · 5183%+1.7u+29%
Kansas City Royals32167%-0.1u-4%
finalJac Caglianone UNDER 0.5 RBIs-225@BetMGM~69.2%Props1ushop +6.1pp+3.1pp vs fairW +0.44u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Jac Caglianone: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Jac Caglianone UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Kansas City Royals @ Houston Astros). Market -225 (~69% implied). Your best price -225 @ BetMGM is 6.1pp better than the sharp ref -305. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
finalVinnie Pasquantino UNDER 0.5 RBIs-275@BetMGM~73.3%Props1ushop +5.2pp+2.1pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Vinnie Pasquantino: 1 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Vinnie Pasquantino UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Kansas City Royals @ Houston Astros). Market -275 (~73% implied). Your best price -275 @ BetMGM is 5.2pp better than the sharp ref -366. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
finalSalvador Perez UNDER 0.5 RBIs-235@BetMGM~70.1%Props1ushop +5.4pp+2.4pp vs fairW +0.43u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Salvador Perez: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Salvador Perez UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Kansas City Royals @ Houston Astros). Market -235 (~70% implied). Your best price -235 @ BetMGM is 5.4pp better than the sharp ref -309. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
Houston Astros330100%+1.8u+61%
finalHunter Brown UNDER 4.5 Hits Allowed-105@BetMGM~51.2%Props1ushop +1.6pp+3.1pp vs fairW +0.95u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Hunter Brown: 2 pit_H (line 4.5)
MLB player prop — Hunter Brown UNDER 4.5 Hits Allowed (Kansas City Royals @ Houston Astros). Market -105 (~51% implied). Your best price -105 @ BetMGM is 1.6pp better than the sharp ref -112. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HASHOP_VALUE
finalYainer Diaz UNDER 0.5 RBIs-225@BetMGM~69.2%Props1ushop +6.0pp+3.0pp vs fairW +0.44u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Yainer Diaz: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Yainer Diaz UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Kansas City Royals @ Houston Astros). Market -225 (~69% implied). Your best price -225 @ BetMGM is 6.0pp better than the sharp ref -304. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
finalIsaac Paredes UNDER 0.5 RBIs-225@BetMGM~69.2%Props1ushop +5.9pp+2.9pp vs fairW +0.44u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Isaac Paredes: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Isaac Paredes UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Kansas City Royals @ Houston Astros). Market -225 (~69% implied). Your best price -225 @ BetMGM is 5.9pp better than the sharp ref -302. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game Total1 bets · 10100%+1.2u+117%finalUNDER 7.5+117@Caesars~46.1%Game TotalZeus PASSshop +7.0pp+5.2pp vs fairW +1.17uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Kansas City Royals 2 @ Houston Astros 4 · total 6
MLB — UNDER 7.5. Leans UNDER: on your own settled record UNDERs hit 58% vs overs 45% — a real, measured market bias. Our own record in MLB|Game Total: 90-132 (-42.43u) — this cell has bled for us. We're 4-6 (-2.56u) backing Houston Astros — they have cost us. Market read: pickem underdog (+117, ~46% implied). Your best price +117 @ Caesars is 7.0pp better than the sharp ref -113. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
Zeus PASS (conf 58): Your 117@Caesars vs a sharp -113 — +5.2pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 46%. This total is a market we have demoted while we keep grading it. We are not putting a number on it.
+5.2pp vs fairtotaledge too thin
⚠ risk: little/no edge — skip it
MLBUNDERSHOP_VALUERESEARCH
▸Props5 bets · 4180%+1.9u+37%finalBobby Witt Jr. UNDER 0.5 Hits+185@BetMGM~35.1%Propsshop +3.4pp+3.8pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Bobby Witt Jr.: 1 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Bobby Witt Jr. UNDER 0.5 Hits (Kansas City Royals @ Houston Astros). Market +185 (~35% implied). Your best price +185 @ BetMGM is 3.4pp better than the sharp ref +160. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalBobby Witt Jr. UNDER 0.5 Runs-145@BetMGM~59.2%Propsshop +4.2pp+3.3pp vs fairW +0.69uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Bobby Witt Jr.: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Bobby Witt Jr. UNDER 0.5 Runs (Kansas City Royals @ Houston Astros). Market -145 (~59% implied). Your best price -145 @ BetMGM is 4.2pp better than the sharp ref -173. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalIsaac Paredes UNDER 0.5 Runs-160@BetMGM~61.5%Propsshop +3.2pp+2.2pp vs fairW +0.62uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Isaac Paredes: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Isaac Paredes UNDER 0.5 Runs (Kansas City Royals @ Houston Astros). Market -160 (~62% implied). Your best price -160 @ BetMGM is 3.3pp better than the sharp ref -184. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalMichael Massey UNDER 0.5 Hits+115@BetMGM~46.5%Propsshop +3.5pp+3.1pp vs fairW +1.15uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Michael Massey: 0 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Michael Massey UNDER 0.5 Hits (Kansas City Royals @ Houston Astros). Market +115 (~47% implied). Your best price +115 @ BetMGM is 3.5pp better than the sharp ref +100. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalLaMonte Wade Jr. UNDER 0.5 Runs-250@BetMGM~71.4%Propsshop +4.1pp+2.6pp vs fairW +0.40uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on LaMonte Wade Jr.: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — LaMonte Wade Jr. UNDER 0.5 Runs (Kansas City Royals @ Houston Astros). Market -250 (~71% implied). Your best price -250 @ BetMGM is 4.1pp better than the sharp ref -308. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
▸Boston Red Sox@Texas RangersFINAL5:06 PM19 propsF1 TotalF3 Total13-4+5.20u
📋 Texas Rangers home vs Boston Red Sox · Probables: Jake Bennett (LHP, 3.69 ERA) (Sox) @ MacKenzie Gore (LHP, 4.62 ERA) (Rangers).
▸Props4 bets · 30100%+1.1u+36%1 no result
Boston Red Sox220100%+0.7u+34%
finalNate Eaton UNDER 0.5 RBIs-325@BetMGM~76.5%Props1.5ushop +6.7pp+3.7pp vs fairW +0.31u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Nate Eaton: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Nate Eaton UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Boston Red Sox @ Texas Rangers). Market -325 (~76% implied). Your best price -325 @ BetMGM is 6.7pp better than the sharp ref -495. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
finalCaleb Durbin UNDER 0.5 RBIs-275@BetMGM~73.3%Props1ushop +5.3pp+2.3pp vs fairW +0.36u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Caleb Durbin: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Caleb Durbin UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Boston Red Sox @ Texas Rangers). Market -275 (~73% implied). Your best price -275 @ BetMGM is 5.3pp better than the sharp ref -368. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
Texas Rangers11 no result
finalCody Freeman UNDER 0.5 RBIs-325@BetMGM~76.5%Props1ushop +6.5pp+3.5pp vs fairno result◆ MIDAS
Void voided in the ledger (no result ever arrived)
MLB player prop — Cody Freeman UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Boston Red Sox @ Texas Rangers). Market -325 (~76% implied). Your best price -325 @ BetMGM is 6.5pp better than the sharp ref -486. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
Team not identified110100%+0.4u+40%
finalJosh Jung UNDER 0.5 RBIs-250@BetMGM~71.4%Props1ushop +5.1pp+2.1pp vs fairW +0.40u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Josh Jung: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Josh Jung UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Boston Red Sox @ Texas Rangers). Market -250 (~71% implied). Your best price -250 @ BetMGM is 5.1pp better than the sharp ref -326. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
▸F1 Total1 bet · 10100%+0.8u+83%finalNRFI (Under 0.5, 1st inning) — Boston Red Sox @ Texas Rangers-120@Caesars~54.5%F1 Total1ushop +1.4pp+2.5pp vs fairW +0.83u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Boston Red Sox 2 @ Texas Rangers 4 · total 6
MLB 1ST INNING segment — NRFI (Under 0.5, 1st inning) — Boston Red Sox @ Texas Rangers. Market: -120 (~55% implied). Your best price -120 @ Caesars is 1.4pp better than the sharp ref -127. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. NRFI is a flagged focus market — tracked every game to measure whether it's a real edge for us.
MLBPERIODNRFISHOP_VALUE
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Props15 bets · 9375%+4.3u+36%3 no resultfinalNate Eaton UNDER 0.5 Runs-235@BetMGM~70.1%Propsshop +6.8pp+5.3pp vs fairW +0.43uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Nate Eaton: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Nate Eaton UNDER 0.5 Runs (Boston Red Sox @ Texas Rangers). Market -235 (~70% implied). Your best price -235 @ BetMGM is 6.8pp better than the sharp ref -333. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalNate Eaton UNDER 0.5 Hits-110@BetMGM~52.4%Propsshop +4.3pp+3.4pp vs fairW +0.91uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Nate Eaton: 0 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Nate Eaton UNDER 0.5 Hits (Boston Red Sox @ Texas Rangers). Market -110 (~52% implied). Your best price -110 @ BetMGM is 4.3pp better than the sharp ref -131. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalWillson Contreras UNDER 0.5 Hits+165@BetMGM~37.7%Propsshop +3.1pp+3.3pp vs fairW +1.65uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Willson Contreras: 0 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Willson Contreras UNDER 0.5 Hits (Boston Red Sox @ Texas Rangers). Market +165 (~38% implied). Your best price +165 @ BetMGM is 3.1pp better than the sharp ref +145. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalCody Freeman UNDER 0.5 Runs-235@BetMGM~70.1%Propsshop +4.5pp+3.1pp vs fairno resultUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Void voided in the ledger (no result ever arrived)
MLB player prop — Cody Freeman UNDER 0.5 Runs (Boston Red Sox @ Texas Rangers). Market -235 (~70% implied). Your best price -235 @ BetMGM is 4.5pp better than the sharp ref -295. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalCaleb Durbin UNDER 0.5 Runs-210@BetMGM~67.7%Propsshop +4.0pp+2.6pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Caleb Durbin: 1 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Caleb Durbin UNDER 0.5 Runs (Boston Red Sox @ Texas Rangers). Market -210 (~68% implied). Your best price -210 @ BetMGM is 4.0pp better than the sharp ref -254. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalCody Freeman UNDER 0.5 Hits+105@BetMGM~48.8%Propsshop +3.1pp+2.6pp vs fairno resultUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Void voided in the ledger (no result ever arrived)
MLB player prop — Cody Freeman UNDER 0.5 Hits (Boston Red Sox @ Texas Rangers). Market +105 (~49% implied). Your best price +105 @ BetMGM is 3.1pp better than the sharp ref -108. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalElias Diaz UNDER 0.5 Hits+105@BetMGM~48.8%Propsshop +3.1pp+2.5pp vs fairno resultUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Void voided in the ledger (no result ever arrived)
MLB player prop — Elias Diaz UNDER 0.5 Hits (Boston Red Sox @ Texas Rangers). Market +105 (~49% implied). Your best price +105 @ BetMGM is 3.1pp better than the sharp ref -108. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalJosh Jung UNDER 0.5 Runs-175@BetMGM~63.6%Propsshop +3.6pp+2.5pp vs fairW +0.57uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Josh Jung: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Josh Jung UNDER 0.5 Runs (Boston Red Sox @ Texas Rangers). Market -175 (~64% implied). Your best price -175 @ BetMGM is 3.6pp better than the sharp ref -205. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalWillson Contreras UNDER 0.5 Runs-140@BetMGM~58.3%Propsshop +2.9pp+2.1pp vs fairW +0.71uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Willson Contreras: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Willson Contreras UNDER 0.5 Runs (Boston Red Sox @ Texas Rangers). Market -140 (~58% implied). Your best price -140 @ BetMGM is 2.9pp better than the sharp ref -158. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalWyatt Langford UNDER 0.5 Runs-160@BetMGM~61.5%Propsshop +3.1pp+2.1pp vs fairW +0.62uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Wyatt Langford: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Wyatt Langford UNDER 0.5 Runs (Boston Red Sox @ Texas Rangers). Market -160 (~62% implied). Your best price -160 @ BetMGM is 3.1pp better than the sharp ref -183. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalWyatt Langford UNDER 0.5 Hits+125@BetMGM~44.4%Propsshop +3.4pp+3.1pp vs fairW +1.25uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Wyatt Langford: 0 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Wyatt Langford UNDER 0.5 Hits (Boston Red Sox @ Texas Rangers). Market +125 (~44% implied). Your best price +125 @ BetMGM is 3.4pp better than the sharp ref +109. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalJake Burger UNDER 0.5 Runs-160@BetMGM~61.5%Propsshop +3.4pp+2.4pp vs fairW +0.62uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Jake Burger: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Jake Burger UNDER 0.5 Runs (Boston Red Sox @ Texas Rangers). Market -160 (~62% implied). Your best price -160 @ BetMGM is 3.4pp better than the sharp ref -185. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalMickey Gasper UNDER 0.5 Runs-190@BetMGM~65.5%Propsshop +4.1pp+2.9pp vs fairW +0.53uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Mickey Gasper: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Mickey Gasper UNDER 0.5 Runs (Boston Red Sox @ Texas Rangers). Market -190 (~66% implied). Your best price -190 @ BetMGM is 4.1pp better than the sharp ref -229. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalEzequiel Duran UNDER 0.5 Runs-210@BetMGM~67.7%Propsshop +3.6pp+2.3pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Ezequiel Duran: 1 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Ezequiel Duran UNDER 0.5 Runs (Boston Red Sox @ Texas Rangers). Market -210 (~68% implied). Your best price -210 @ BetMGM is 3.6pp better than the sharp ref -249. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalDanny Jansen UNDER 0.5 Runs-210@BetMGM~67.7%Propsshop +3.4pp+2.0pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Danny Jansen: 1 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Danny Jansen UNDER 0.5 Runs (Boston Red Sox @ Texas Rangers). Market -210 (~68% implied). Your best price -210 @ BetMGM is 3.4pp better than the sharp ref -246. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
▸F3 Total1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalF3 UNDER 2.5-120@Caesars~54.5%F3 Totalshop +3.6pp+2.3pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Boston Red Sox 2 @ Texas Rangers 4 · total 6
MLB FIRST 3 INNINGS segment — F3 UNDER 2.5. Market: -120 (~55% implied). Your best price -120 @ Caesars is 3.6pp better than the sharp ref -139. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPERIODF3SHOP_VALUE
▸San Francisco Giants@St. Louis CardinalsFINAL4:45 PMO/U15 propsF5 Total8-9-2.06u
📋 St. Louis Cardinals home vs San Francisco Giants · Probables: Blade Tidwell (RHP, 4.56 ERA) (Giants) @ Andre Pallante (RHP, 3.70 ERA) (Cardinals).
▸Props5 bets · 4180%+1.0u+19%
San Francisco Giants43175%+0.4u+11%
finalBryce Eldridge UNDER 0.5 RBIs-250@BetMGM~71.4%Props1ushop +5.4pp+2.4pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Bryce Eldridge: 3 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Bryce Eldridge UNDER 0.5 RBIs (San Francisco Giants @ St. Louis Cardinals). Market -250 (~71% implied). Your best price -250 @ BetMGM is 5.4pp better than the sharp ref -331. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
finalJonah Cox UNDER 0.5 RBIs-250@BetMGM~71.4%Props1ushop +5.3pp+2.2pp vs fairW +0.40u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Jonah Cox: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Jonah Cox UNDER 0.5 RBIs (San Francisco Giants @ St. Louis Cardinals). Market -250 (~71% implied). Your best price -250 @ BetMGM is 5.3pp better than the sharp ref -329. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
finalDrew Gilbert UNDER 0.5 RBIs-300@BetMGM~75.0%Props1.5ushop +6.7pp+3.7pp vs fairW +0.33u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Drew Gilbert: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Drew Gilbert UNDER 0.5 RBIs (San Francisco Giants @ St. Louis Cardinals). Market -300 (~75% implied). Your best price -300 @ BetMGM is 6.7pp better than the sharp ref -447. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
finalBlade Tidwell UNDER 5.5 Hits Allowed-140@BetMGM~58.3%Props1ushop +3.2pp+4.1pp vs fairW +0.71u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Blade Tidwell: 3 pit_H (line 5.5)
MLB player prop — Blade Tidwell UNDER 5.5 Hits Allowed (San Francisco Giants @ St. Louis Cardinals). Market -140 (~58% implied). Your best price -140 @ BetMGM is 3.2pp better than the sharp ref -160. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HASHOP_VALUE
Team not identified110100%+0.5u+53%
finalLeonardo Bernal UNDER 0.5 RBIs-190@BetMGM~65.5%Props1ushop +5.3pp+2.5pp vs fairW +0.53u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Leonardo Bernal: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Leonardo Bernal UNDER 0.5 RBIs (San Francisco Giants @ St. Louis Cardinals). Market -190 (~66% implied). Your best price -190 @ BetMGM is 5.3pp better than the sharp ref -243. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game Total1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalUNDER 8.5-110@BetMGM~52.4%Game TotalZeus PASS-1.0pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on San Francisco Giants 10 @ St. Louis Cardinals 3 · total 13
MLB — UNDER 8.5. Leans UNDER: on your own settled record UNDERs hit 58% vs overs 45% — a real, measured market bias. Our own record in MLB|Game Total: 90-132 (-42.43u) — this cell has bled for us. We're 10-5 (+7.48u) backing St. Louis Cardinals — they have paid us. Market read: pickem favorite (-110, ~52% implied). Your best price -110 @ BetMGM is 0.7pp better than the sharp ref -113. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
Zeus PASS (conf 65): Your -110@BetMGM vs a sharp -113 — -1.0pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 52%. This total is a market we have demoted while we keep grading it. We are not putting a number on it.
-1.0pp vs fairtotaledge too thin
⚠ risk: little/no edge — skip it
MLBUNDERRESEARCH
▸Props10 bets · 4640%-1.0u-10%finalLeonardo Bernal UNDER 0.5 Hits+180@BetMGM~35.7%Propsshop +4.8pp+5.0pp vs fairW +1.80uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Leonardo Bernal: 0 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Leonardo Bernal UNDER 0.5 Hits (San Francisco Giants @ St. Louis Cardinals). Market +180 (~36% implied). Your best price +180 @ BetMGM is 4.8pp better than the sharp ref +147. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalJung Hoo Lee UNDER 0.5 Runs-165@BetMGM~62.3%Propsshop +5.7pp+4.5pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Jung Hoo Lee: 1 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Jung Hoo Lee UNDER 0.5 Runs (San Francisco Giants @ St. Louis Cardinals). Market -165 (~62% implied). Your best price -165 @ BetMGM is 5.7pp better than the sharp ref -212. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalLeonardo Bernal UNDER 0.5 Runs-140@BetMGM~58.3%Propsshop +4.8pp+3.8pp vs fairW +0.71uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Leonardo Bernal: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Leonardo Bernal UNDER 0.5 Runs (San Francisco Giants @ St. Louis Cardinals). Market -140 (~58% implied). Your best price -140 @ BetMGM is 4.8pp better than the sharp ref -171. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalNathan Church UNDER 0.5 Hits+140@BetMGM~41.7%Propsshop +3.6pp+3.4pp vs fairW +1.40uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Nathan Church: 0 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Nathan Church UNDER 0.5 Hits (San Francisco Giants @ St. Louis Cardinals). Market +140 (~42% implied). Your best price +140 @ BetMGM is 3.6pp better than the sharp ref +121. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalDrew Cavanaugh UNDER 0.5 Hits+105@BetMGM~48.8%Propsshop +3.4pp+2.7pp vs fairW +1.05uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Drew Cavanaugh: 0 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Drew Cavanaugh UNDER 0.5 Hits (San Francisco Giants @ St. Louis Cardinals). Market +105 (~49% implied). Your best price +105 @ BetMGM is 3.4pp better than the sharp ref -109. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalBryce Eldridge UNDER 0.5 Hits+160@BetMGM~38.5%Propsshop +3.0pp+3.2pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Bryce Eldridge: 2 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Bryce Eldridge UNDER 0.5 Hits (San Francisco Giants @ St. Louis Cardinals). Market +160 (~38% implied). Your best price +160 @ BetMGM is 3.0pp better than the sharp ref +141. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalTurner Hill UNDER 0.5 Hits+140@BetMGM~41.7%Propsshop +3.2pp+3.1pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Turner Hill: 2 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Turner Hill UNDER 0.5 Hits (San Francisco Giants @ St. Louis Cardinals). Market +140 (~42% implied). Your best price +140 @ BetMGM is 3.2pp better than the sharp ref +123. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalDrew Gilbert UNDER 0.5 Runs-160@BetMGM~61.5%Propsshop +3.5pp+2.4pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Drew Gilbert: 1 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Drew Gilbert UNDER 0.5 Runs (San Francisco Giants @ St. Louis Cardinals). Market -160 (~62% implied). Your best price -160 @ BetMGM is 3.5pp better than the sharp ref -186. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalBryce Eldridge UNDER 0.5 Runs-150@BetMGM~60.0%Propsshop +3.2pp+2.3pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Bryce Eldridge: 2 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Bryce Eldridge UNDER 0.5 Runs (San Francisco Giants @ St. Louis Cardinals). Market -150 (~60% implied). Your best price -150 @ BetMGM is 3.2pp better than the sharp ref -172. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalOsleivis Basabe UNDER 0.5 Hits+150@BetMGM~40.0%Propsshop +4.6pp+4.5pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Osleivis Basabe: 1 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Osleivis Basabe UNDER 0.5 Hits (San Francisco Giants @ St. Louis Cardinals). Market +150 (~40% implied). Your best price +150 @ BetMGM is 4.6pp better than the sharp ref +124. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
▸F5 Total1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalF5 UNDER 4.5-102@BetMGM~50.5%F5 Totalshop +1.2pp+2.2pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on San Francisco Giants 10 @ St. Louis Cardinals 3 · total 13
MLB FIRST 5 INNINGS segment — F5 UNDER 4.5. Market: -102 (~50% implied). Your best price -102 @ BetMGM is 1.2pp better than the sharp ref -107. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPERIODF5SHOP_VALUE
▸New York Yankees@Minnesota TwinsFINAL4:40 PMML10 propsF5 MLF3 Total8-4+1.68u
📋 Minnesota Twins home vs New York Yankees · Probables: Max Fried (LHP, 2.63 ERA) (Yankees) @ Bailey Ober (RHP, 4.32 ERA) (Twins).
▸Props4 bets · 2167%-0.4u-12%1 no result
New York Yankees1010%-1.0u-100%
finalMax Fried UNDER 4.5 Hits Allowed-118@BetMGM~54.1%Props1ushop +6.0pp+7.0pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Max Fried: 6 pit_H (line 4.5)
MLB player prop — Max Fried UNDER 4.5 Hits Allowed (New York Yankees @ Minnesota Twins). Market -118 (~54% implied). Your best price -118 @ BetMGM is 6.0pp better than the sharp ref -151. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HASHOP_VALUE
Minnesota Twins320100%+0.6u+32%1 no result
finalLuke Keaschall UNDER 0.5 RBIs-325@BetMGM~76.5%Props1ushop +5.2pp+2.1pp vs fairW +0.31u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Luke Keaschall: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Luke Keaschall UNDER 0.5 RBIs (New York Yankees @ Minnesota Twins). Market -325 (~76% implied). Your best price -325 @ BetMGM is 5.1pp better than the sharp ref -444. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
finalRyan Jeffers UNDER 0.5 RBIs-275@BetMGM~73.3%Props1ushop +5.4pp+2.4pp vs fairno result◆ MIDAS
Void voided in the ledger (no result ever arrived)
MLB player prop — Ryan Jeffers UNDER 0.5 RBIs (New York Yankees @ Minnesota Twins). Market -275 (~73% implied). Your best price -275 @ BetMGM is 5.4pp better than the sharp ref -370. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
finalKaelen Culpepper UNDER 0.5 RBIs-300@BetMGM~75.0%Props1ushop +5.8pp+2.8pp vs fairW +0.33u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Kaelen Culpepper: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Kaelen Culpepper UNDER 0.5 RBIs (New York Yankees @ Minnesota Twins). Market -300 (~75% implied). Your best price -300 @ BetMGM is 5.8pp better than the sharp ref -420. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game ML1 bets · 10100%+0.6u+59%finalNew York Yankees ML-170@Caesars~63.0%Game MLZeus PASS-1.3pp vs fairW +0.59uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on New York Yankees 8 @ Minnesota Twins 1
MLB — New York Yankees ML. Starting pitcher edge: our SP 2.73 ERA vs 4.28 — the biggest single input in a baseball game. Our own record in MLB|Game ML: 43-35 (+1.21u) — a measured edge here. MOD_FAV band is 60-39 (+4.89u) on our book. Market read: mod fav favorite (-170, ~63% implied). Your best price -170 @ Caesars ≈ sharp ref -172 (no shopping edge). (Global best -158 @ draftkings is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
Zeus PASS (conf 67): Your -170@Caesars vs a sharp -172 — -1.3pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 63%. No line-shopping edge and no situational reason on this moneyline — it's a vig-paying coin flip. Pass.
-1.3pp vs fairmoneylineedge too thin
⚠ risk: little/no edge — skip it
MLBML_FAVMOD_FAVRESEARCH
▸Props6 bets · 5183%+3.4u+58%finalKaelen Culpepper UNDER 0.5 Runs-210@BetMGM~67.7%Propsshop +6.2pp+4.7pp vs fairW +0.48uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Kaelen Culpepper: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Kaelen Culpepper UNDER 0.5 Runs (New York Yankees @ Minnesota Twins). Market -210 (~68% implied). Your best price -210 @ BetMGM is 6.1pp better than the sharp ref -283. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalKaelen Culpepper UNDER 0.5 Hits+145@BetMGM~40.8%Propsshop +4.0pp+3.9pp vs fairW +1.45uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Kaelen Culpepper: 0 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Kaelen Culpepper UNDER 0.5 Hits (New York Yankees @ Minnesota Twins). Market +145 (~41% implied). Your best price +145 @ BetMGM is 4.0pp better than the sharp ref +123. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalLuke Keaschall UNDER 0.5 Runs-175@BetMGM~63.6%Propsshop +3.9pp+2.7pp vs fairW +0.57uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Luke Keaschall: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Luke Keaschall UNDER 0.5 Runs (New York Yankees @ Minnesota Twins). Market -175 (~64% implied). Your best price -175 @ BetMGM is 3.9pp better than the sharp ref -208. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalAustin Martin UNDER 0.5 Hits-105@BetMGM~51.2%Propsshop +3.3pp+2.5pp vs fairW +0.95uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Austin Martin: 0 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Austin Martin UNDER 0.5 Hits (New York Yankees @ Minnesota Twins). Market -105 (~51% implied). Your best price -105 @ BetMGM is 3.3pp better than the sharp ref -120. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalLuke Keaschall UNDER 0.5 Hits+165@BetMGM~37.7%Propsshop +3.8pp+3.9pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Luke Keaschall: 3 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Luke Keaschall UNDER 0.5 Hits (New York Yankees @ Minnesota Twins). Market +165 (~38% implied). Your best price +165 @ BetMGM is 3.8pp better than the sharp ref +141. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalVictor Caratini UNDER 0.5 Hits+100@BetMGM~50.0%Propsshop +2.8pp+2.1pp vs fairW +1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Victor Caratini: 0 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Victor Caratini UNDER 0.5 Hits (New York Yankees @ Minnesota Twins). Market +100 (~50% implied). Your best price +100 @ BetMGM is 2.8pp better than the sharp ref -112. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
▸F5 ML1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalMinnesota Twins F5 ML+150@Caesars~40.0%F5 MLshop +2.5pp+0.1pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on New York Yankees 8 @ Minnesota Twins 1 · total 9
MLB FIRST 5 INNINGS segment — Minnesota Twins F5 ML. Market: +150 (~40% implied). Your best price +150 @ Caesars is 2.6pp better than the sharp ref +135. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPERIODF5SHOP_VALUE
▸F3 Total1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalF3 UNDER 2.5-130@Caesars~56.5%F3 Totalshop +3.2pp+1.8pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on New York Yankees 8 @ Minnesota Twins 1 · total 9
MLB FIRST 3 INNINGS segment — F3 UNDER 2.5. Market: -130 (~57% implied). Your best price -130 @ Caesars is 3.2pp better than the sharp ref -148. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
📋 Chicago Cubs home vs Atlanta Braves · Probables: Martín Pérez (LHP, 3.07 ERA) (Braves) @ Kevin Gausman (RHP, 4.55 ERA) (Cubs).
▸Props7 bets · 3260%-0.7u-14%2 no result
Atlanta Braves42167%-0.2u-6%1 no result
finalMike Yastrzemski UNDER 0.5 RBIs-350@BetMGM~77.8%Props1ushop +6.2pp+3.3pp vs fairW +0.29u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Mike Yastrzemski: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Mike Yastrzemski UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market -350 (~78% implied). Your best price -350 @ BetMGM is 6.2pp better than the sharp ref -526. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
finalMatt Olson UNDER 0.5 RBIs-190@BetMGM~65.5%Props1ushop +5.0pp+2.1pp vs fairW +0.53u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Matt Olson: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Matt Olson UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market -190 (~66% implied). Your best price -190 @ BetMGM is 5.0pp better than the sharp ref -239. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
finalDrake Baldwin UNDER 0.5 RBIs-250@BetMGM~71.4%Props1ushop +5.1pp+2.1pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Drake Baldwin: 2 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Drake Baldwin UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market -250 (~71% implied). Your best price -250 @ BetMGM is 5.1pp better than the sharp ref -326. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
finalMartin Perez UNDER 5.5 Hits Allowed-125@BetMGM~55.6%Props1ushop +1.9pp+3.1pp vs fairno result◆ MIDAS
Void voided in the ledger (no result ever arrived)
MLB player prop — Martin Perez UNDER 5.5 Hits Allowed (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market -125 (~56% implied). Your best price -125 @ BetMGM is 1.9pp better than the sharp ref -135. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HASHOP_VALUE
Chicago Cubs31150%-0.5u-25%1 no result
finalTyrone Taylor UNDER 0.5 RBIs-200@BetMGM~66.7%Props1.5ushop +8.0pp+5.0pp vs fairW +0.50u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Tyrone Taylor: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Tyrone Taylor UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market -200 (~67% implied). Your best price -200 @ BetMGM is 8.0pp better than the sharp ref -295. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
finalPedro Ramirez UNDER 0.5 RBIs-250@BetMGM~71.4%Props1ushop +6.1pp+3.0pp vs fairno result◆ MIDAS
Void voided in the ledger (no result ever arrived)
MLB player prop — Pedro Ramirez UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market -250 (~71% implied). Your best price -250 @ BetMGM is 6.1pp better than the sharp ref -345. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
finalMiguel Amaya UNDER 0.5 RBIs-325@BetMGM~76.5%Props1ushop +6.0pp+3.0pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Miguel Amaya: 1 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Miguel Amaya UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market -325 (~76% implied). Your best price -325 @ BetMGM is 6.0pp better than the sharp ref -471. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game Total1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalUNDER 8.5-110@Caesars~52.4%Game TotalZeus PASS-2.4pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Atlanta Braves 6 @ Chicago Cubs 3 · total 9
MLB — UNDER 8.5. Leans UNDER: on your own settled record UNDERs hit 58% vs overs 45% — a real, measured market bias. Our own record in MLB|Game Total: 90-132 (-42.43u) — this cell has bled for us. We're 4-7 (-3.36u) backing Chicago Cubs — they have cost us. Market read: pickem favorite (-110, ~52% implied). Your best price -110 @ Caesars ≈ sharp ref -110 (no shopping edge). (Global best -104 @ onexbet is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
Zeus PASS (conf 75): Your -110@Caesars vs a sharp -110 — -2.4pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 52%. This total is a market we have demoted while we keep grading it. We are not putting a number on it.
-2.4pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: little/no edge — skip it
MLBUNDERRESEARCH
▸Props17 bets · 10567%+3.0u+20%2 no resultfinalTyrone Taylor UNDER 0.5 Hits+165@BetMGM~37.7%Propsshop +6.3pp+6.3pp vs fairW +1.65uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Tyrone Taylor: 0 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Tyrone Taylor UNDER 0.5 Hits (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market +165 (~38% implied). Your best price +165 @ BetMGM is 6.3pp better than the sharp ref +127. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalMichael Harris II UNDER 0.5 Runs-140@BetMGM~58.3%Propsshop +5.6pp+4.7pp vs fairW +0.71uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Michael Harris II: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Michael Harris II UNDER 0.5 Runs (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market -140 (~58% implied). Your best price -140 @ BetMGM is 5.6pp better than the sharp ref -177. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalCarson Kelly UNDER 0.5 Hits+140@BetMGM~41.7%Propsshop +4.4pp+4.3pp vs fairno resultUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Carson Kelly: 0 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Carson Kelly UNDER 0.5 Hits (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market +140 (~42% implied). Your best price +140 @ BetMGM is 4.4pp better than the sharp ref +117. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalSeiya Suzuki UNDER 0.5 Hits+180@BetMGM~35.7%Propsshop +3.5pp+3.8pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Seiya Suzuki: 1 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Seiya Suzuki UNDER 0.5 Hits (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market +180 (~36% implied). Your best price +180 @ BetMGM is 3.5pp better than the sharp ref +155. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalTyrone Taylor UNDER 0.5 Runs-165@BetMGM~62.3%Propsshop +4.7pp+3.7pp vs fairW +0.61uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Tyrone Taylor: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Tyrone Taylor UNDER 0.5 Runs (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market -165 (~62% implied). Your best price -165 @ BetMGM is 4.7pp better than the sharp ref -203. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalMike Yastrzemski UNDER 0.5 Hits-105@BetMGM~51.2%Propsshop +3.9pp+3.1pp vs fairW +0.95uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Mike Yastrzemski: 0 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Mike Yastrzemski UNDER 0.5 Hits (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market -105 (~51% implied). Your best price -105 @ BetMGM is 3.9pp better than the sharp ref -123. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalMatt Shaw UNDER 0.5 Runs-185@BetMGM~64.9%Propsshop +4.2pp+3.0pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Matt Shaw: 1 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Matt Shaw UNDER 0.5 Runs (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market -185 (~65% implied). Your best price -185 @ BetMGM is 4.2pp better than the sharp ref -224. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalPete Crow-Armstrong UNDER 0.5 Runs-105@BetMGM~51.2%Propsshop +3.1pp+2.8pp vs fairW +0.95uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Pete Crow-Armstrong: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Pete Crow-Armstrong UNDER 0.5 Runs (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market -105 (~51% implied). Your best price -105 @ BetMGM is 3.1pp better than the sharp ref -119. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalRonald Acuna Jr. UNDER 0.5 Runs-125@BetMGM~55.6%Propsshop +3.3pp+2.7pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Ronald Acuna Jr.: 1 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Ronald Acuna Jr. UNDER 0.5 Runs (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market -125 (~56% implied). Your best price -125 @ BetMGM is 3.3pp better than the sharp ref -143. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalMike Yastrzemski UNDER 0.5 Runs-250@BetMGM~71.4%Propsshop +4.1pp+2.7pp vs fairW +0.40uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Mike Yastrzemski: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Mike Yastrzemski UNDER 0.5 Runs (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market -250 (~71% implied). Your best price -250 @ BetMGM is 4.1pp better than the sharp ref -309. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalSeiya Suzuki UNDER 0.5 Runs-115@BetMGM~53.5%Propsshop +2.8pp+2.4pp vs fairW +0.87uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Seiya Suzuki: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Seiya Suzuki UNDER 0.5 Runs (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market -115 (~53% implied). Your best price -115 @ BetMGM is 2.8pp better than the sharp ref -129. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalMiguel Amaya UNDER 0.5 Hits+100@BetMGM~50.0%Propsshop +5.6pp+4.7pp vs fairW +1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Miguel Amaya: 0 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Miguel Amaya UNDER 0.5 Hits (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market +100 (~50% implied). Your best price +100 @ BetMGM is 5.6pp better than the sharp ref -125. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalPedro Ramirez UNDER 0.5 Hits+145@BetMGM~40.8%Propsshop +3.8pp+3.7pp vs fairno resultUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Void voided in the ledger (no result ever arrived)
MLB player prop — Pedro Ramirez UNDER 0.5 Hits (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market +145 (~41% implied). Your best price +145 @ BetMGM is 3.8pp better than the sharp ref +124. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalMiguel Amaya UNDER 0.5 Runs-210@BetMGM~67.7%Propsshop +4.9pp+3.6pp vs fairW +0.48uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Miguel Amaya: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Miguel Amaya UNDER 0.5 Runs (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market -210 (~68% implied). Your best price -210 @ BetMGM is 4.9pp better than the sharp ref -266. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalRonald Acuna Jr. UNDER 0.5 Hits+180@BetMGM~35.7%Propsshop +3.0pp+3.4pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Ronald Acuna Jr.: 1 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Ronald Acuna Jr. UNDER 0.5 Hits (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market +180 (~36% implied). Your best price +180 @ BetMGM is 3.0pp better than the sharp ref +158. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalBrewer Hicklen UNDER 0.5 Hits-120@BetMGM~54.5%Propsshop +3.3pp+2.2pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Brewer Hicklen: 1 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Brewer Hicklen UNDER 0.5 Hits (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market -120 (~55% implied). Your best price -120 @ BetMGM is 3.3pp better than the sharp ref -137. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalBrewer Hicklen UNDER 0.5 Runs-275@BetMGM~73.3%Propsshop +3.6pp+2.2pp vs fairW +0.36uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Brewer Hicklen: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Brewer Hicklen UNDER 0.5 Runs (Atlanta Braves @ Chicago Cubs). Market -275 (~73% implied). Your best price -275 @ BetMGM is 3.6pp better than the sharp ref -333. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
▸F3 Total1 bets · 10100%+0.9u+91%finalF3 UNDER 2.5-110@Caesars~52.4%F3 Totalshop +2.4pp+1.2pp vs fairW +0.91uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Atlanta Braves 6 @ Chicago Cubs 3 · total 9
MLB FIRST 3 INNINGS segment — F3 UNDER 2.5. Market: -110 (~52% implied). Your best price -110 @ Caesars is 2.4pp better than the sharp ref -121. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPERIODF3SHOP_VALUE
▸Baltimore Orioles@New York MetsFINAL4:10 PMO/U6 props3-3-1.12u
📋 New York Mets home vs Baltimore Orioles · Probables: Shane Baz (RHP, 4.11 ERA) (Orioles) @ Sean Manaea (LHP, 4.74 ERA) (Mets).
▸Props1 bet · 10100%+0.4u+44%finalFrancisco Lindor UNDER 0.5 RBIs-225@BetMGM~69.2%Props1ushop +5.5pp+2.5pp vs fairW +0.44u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Francisco Lindor: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Francisco Lindor UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Baltimore Orioles @ New York Mets). Market -225 (~69% implied). Your best price -225 @ BetMGM is 5.5pp better than the sharp ref -296. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game Total1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalUNDER 7.5+109@Caesars~47.8%Game TotalZeus PASSshop +3.8pp+2.1pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Baltimore Orioles 7 @ New York Mets 5 · total 12
MLB — UNDER 7.5. Leans UNDER: on your own settled record UNDERs hit 58% vs overs 45% — a real, measured market bias. Our own record in MLB|Game Total: 90-132 (-42.43u) — this cell has bled for us. We're 10-2 (+8.73u) backing New York Mets — they have paid us. Market read: pickem underdog (+109, ~48% implied). Your best price +109 @ Caesars is 3.8pp better than the sharp ref -107. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -107 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus PASS (conf 58): Your 109@Caesars vs a sharp -107 — +2.1pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 48%. This total is a market we have demoted while we keep grading it. We are not putting a number on it.
+2.1pp vs fairtotaledge too thin
⚠ risk: little/no edge — skip it
MLBUNDERSHOP_VALUERESEARCH
▸Props5 bets · 2250%-0.6u-14%1 no resultfinalFrancisco Lindor UNDER 0.5 Runs-110@BetMGM~52.4%Propsshop +5.4pp+4.8pp vs fairW +0.91uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Francisco Lindor: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Francisco Lindor UNDER 0.5 Runs (Baltimore Orioles @ New York Mets). Market -110 (~52% implied). Your best price -110 @ BetMGM is 5.4pp better than the sharp ref -137. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalGunnar Henderson UNDER 0.5 Runs-190@BetMGM~65.5%Propsshop +4.3pp+3.0pp vs fairW +0.53uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Gunnar Henderson: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Gunnar Henderson UNDER 0.5 Runs (Baltimore Orioles @ New York Mets). Market -190 (~66% implied). Your best price -190 @ BetMGM is 4.3pp better than the sharp ref -231. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalCarlos Narvaez UNDER 0.5 Hits-120@BetMGM~54.5%Propsshop +4.0pp+2.9pp vs fairno resultUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Void voided in the ledger (no result ever arrived)
MLB player prop — Carlos Narvaez UNDER 0.5 Hits (Baltimore Orioles @ New York Mets). Market -120 (~55% implied). Your best price -120 @ BetMGM is 4.0pp better than the sharp ref -141. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalCoby Mayo UNDER 0.5 Runs-165@BetMGM~62.3%Propsshop +4.0pp+2.8pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Coby Mayo: 1 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Coby Mayo UNDER 0.5 Runs (Baltimore Orioles @ New York Mets). Market -165 (~62% implied). Your best price -165 @ BetMGM is 4.0pp better than the sharp ref -196. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalBrett Baty UNDER 0.5 Hits+100@BetMGM~50.0%Propsshop +3.5pp+2.8pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Brett Baty: 1 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Brett Baty UNDER 0.5 Hits (Baltimore Orioles @ New York Mets). Market +100 (~50% implied). Your best price +100 @ BetMGM is 3.5pp better than the sharp ref -115. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
▸Detroit Tigers@Toronto Blue JaysFINAL4:08 PM5 propsF3 TotalF3 ML2-1+0.36u
📋 Toronto Blue Jays home vs Detroit Tigers · Probables: Drew Anderson (RHP, 3.62 ERA) (Tigers) @ Braydon Fisher (RHP, 3.16 ERA) (Jays).
▸Props1 bet · 010%-1.0u-100%finalJohn Peck UNDER 0.5 RBIs-350@BetMGM~77.8%Props1ushop +5.2pp+2.2pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on John Peck: 1 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — John Peck UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Detroit Tigers @ Toronto Blue Jays). Market -350 (~78% implied). Your best price -350 @ BetMGM is 5.2pp better than the sharp ref -486. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Props4 bets · 10100%+0.5u+45%3 no resultfinalJohn Peck UNDER 0.5 Runs-220@BetMGM~68.8%Propsshop +5.3pp+4.0pp vs fairW +0.45uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on John Peck: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — John Peck UNDER 0.5 Runs (Detroit Tigers @ Toronto Blue Jays). Market -220 (~69% implied). Your best price -220 @ BetMGM is 5.3pp better than the sharp ref -286. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalDillon Dingler UNDER 0.5 Runs-190@BetMGM~65.5%Propsshop +3.4pp+2.2pp vs fairno resultUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Void voided in the ledger (no result ever arrived)
MLB player prop — Dillon Dingler UNDER 0.5 Runs (Detroit Tigers @ Toronto Blue Jays). Market -190 (~66% implied). Your best price -190 @ BetMGM is 3.4pp better than the sharp ref -222. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalColt Keith UNDER 0.5 Hits-105@BetMGM~51.2%Propsshop +2.9pp+2.2pp vs fairno resultUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Void voided in the ledger (no result ever arrived)
MLB player prop — Colt Keith UNDER 0.5 Hits (Detroit Tigers @ Toronto Blue Jays). Market -105 (~51% implied). Your best price -105 @ BetMGM is 2.9pp better than the sharp ref -118. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalColt Keith UNDER 0.5 Runs-250@BetMGM~71.4%Propsshop +3.5pp+2.1pp vs fairno resultUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Void voided in the ledger (no result ever arrived)
MLB player prop — Colt Keith UNDER 0.5 Runs (Detroit Tigers @ Toronto Blue Jays). Market -250 (~71% implied). Your best price -250 @ BetMGM is 3.5pp better than the sharp ref -299. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
▸F3 Total1 bets · 10100%+0.9u+91%finalF3 UNDER 2.5-110@Caesars~52.4%F3 Totalshop +3.2pp+1.9pp vs fairW +0.91uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Detroit Tigers 10 @ Toronto Blue Jays 1 · total 11
MLB FIRST 3 INNINGS segment — F3 UNDER 2.5. Market: -110 (~52% implied). Your best price -110 @ Caesars is 3.2pp better than the sharp ref -125. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPERIODF3SHOP_VALUE
▸F3 ML1 bets · 1 pushfinalDetroit Tigers F3 ML+105@Caesars~48.8%F3 MLshop +4.7pp+1.2pp vs fairpushUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Detroit Tigers 10 @ Toronto Blue Jays 1 · total 11
MLB FIRST 3 INNINGS segment — Detroit Tigers F3 ML. Market: +105 (~49% implied). Your best price +105 @ Caesars is 4.7pp better than the sharp ref -115. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
📋 Washington Nationals home vs Philadelphia Phillies · Probables: Cristopher Sánchez (LHP, 2.93 ERA) (Phillies) @ Jackson Kent (LHP, 6.40 ERA) (Nationals).
▸Props2 bets · 020%-2.0u-100%
Philadelphia Phillies1010%-1.0u-100%
finalLuis Arraez UNDER 0.5 RBIs-165@BetMGM~62.3%Props1ushop +6.1pp+3.3pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Luis Arraez: 1 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Luis Arraez UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Philadelphia Phillies @ Washington Nationals). Market -165 (~62% implied). Your best price -165 @ BetMGM is 6.1pp better than the sharp ref -216. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
Washington Nationals1010%-1.0u-100%
finalYohandy Morales UNDER 0.5 RBIs-325@BetMGM~76.5%Props1ushop +5.4pp+2.4pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Yohandy Morales: 1 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Yohandy Morales UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Philadelphia Phillies @ Washington Nationals). Market -325 (~76% implied). Your best price -325 @ BetMGM is 5.4pp better than the sharp ref -451. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Props10 bets · 5550%-1.7u-17%finalYohandy Morales UNDER 0.5 Hits+135@BetMGM~42.6%Propsshop +5.1pp+4.8pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Yohandy Morales: 1 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Yohandy Morales UNDER 0.5 Hits (Philadelphia Phillies @ Washington Nationals). Market +135 (~43% implied). Your best price +135 @ BetMGM is 5.1pp better than the sharp ref +110. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalYohandy Morales UNDER 0.5 Runs-225@BetMGM~69.2%Propsshop +5.2pp+3.8pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Yohandy Morales: 1 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Yohandy Morales UNDER 0.5 Runs (Philadelphia Phillies @ Washington Nationals). Market -225 (~69% implied). Your best price -225 @ BetMGM is 5.2pp better than the sharp ref -291. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalJacob Young UNDER 0.5 Hits+110@BetMGM~47.6%Propsshop +4.3pp+3.7pp vs fairW +1.10uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Jacob Young: 0 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Jacob Young UNDER 0.5 Hits (Philadelphia Phillies @ Washington Nationals). Market +110 (~48% implied). Your best price +110 @ BetMGM is 4.3pp better than the sharp ref -108. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalAndrés Chaparro UNDER 0.5 Runs-220@BetMGM~68.8%Propsshop +4.7pp+3.3pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Andrés Chaparro: 1 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Andrés Chaparro UNDER 0.5 Runs (Philadelphia Phillies @ Washington Nationals). Market -220 (~69% implied). Your best price -220 @ BetMGM is 4.7pp better than the sharp ref -276. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalHarry Ford UNDER 0.5 Hits+100@BetMGM~50.0%Propsshop +3.0pp+2.4pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Harry Ford: 1 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Harry Ford UNDER 0.5 Hits (Philadelphia Phillies @ Washington Nationals). Market +100 (~50% implied). Your best price +100 @ BetMGM is 3.1pp better than the sharp ref -113. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalJacob Young UNDER 0.5 Runs-300@BetMGM~75.0%Propsshop +3.8pp+2.4pp vs fairW +0.33uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Jacob Young: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Jacob Young UNDER 0.5 Runs (Philadelphia Phillies @ Washington Nationals). Market -300 (~75% implied). Your best price -300 @ BetMGM is 3.8pp better than the sharp ref -372. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalDerek Hill UNDER 0.5 Runs-190@BetMGM~65.5%Propsshop +3.6pp+2.4pp vs fairW +0.53uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Derek Hill: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Derek Hill UNDER 0.5 Runs (Philadelphia Phillies @ Washington Nationals). Market -190 (~66% implied). Your best price -190 @ BetMGM is 3.6pp better than the sharp ref -224. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalJorbit Vivas UNDER 0.5 Hits-115@BetMGM~53.5%Propsshop +3.0pp+2.1pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Jorbit Vivas: 1 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Jorbit Vivas UNDER 0.5 Hits (Philadelphia Phillies @ Washington Nationals). Market -115 (~53% implied). Your best price -115 @ BetMGM is 3.0pp better than the sharp ref -130. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalAlec Bohm UNDER 0.5 Runs-140@BetMGM~58.3%Propsshop +2.9pp+2.1pp vs fairW +0.71uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Alec Bohm: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Alec Bohm UNDER 0.5 Runs (Philadelphia Phillies @ Washington Nationals). Market -140 (~58% implied). Your best price -140 @ BetMGM is 2.9pp better than the sharp ref -158. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalJ.T. Realmuto UNDER 0.5 Runs-160@BetMGM~61.5%Propsshop +3.1pp+2.1pp vs fairW +0.62uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on J.T. Realmuto: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — J.T. Realmuto UNDER 0.5 Runs (Philadelphia Phillies @ Washington Nationals). Market -160 (~62% implied). Your best price -160 @ BetMGM is 3.1pp better than the sharp ref -183. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
▸F5 ML1 bets · 1 pushfinalWashington Nationals F5 ML+170@Caesars~37.0%F5 MLshop +3.0pp+0.7pp vs fairpushUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Philadelphia Phillies 3 @ Washington Nationals 6 · total 9
MLB FIRST 5 INNINGS segment — Washington Nationals F5 ML. Market: +170 (~37% implied). Your best price +170 @ Caesars is 3.0pp better than the sharp ref +150. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
📋 Pittsburgh Pirates home vs Milwaukee Brewers · Probables: Jacob Misiorowski (RHP, 1.89 ERA) (Brewers) @ Lake Bachar (RHP, 3.54 ERA) (Pirates).
▸Props2 bets · 1150%-0.7u-36%
Milwaukee Brewers1010%-1.0u-100%
finalJacob Misiorowski UNDER 3.5 Hits Allowed-105@BetMGM~51.2%Props1ushop +3.3pp+4.7pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Jacob Misiorowski: 5 pit_H (line 3.5)
MLB player prop — Jacob Misiorowski UNDER 3.5 Hits Allowed (Milwaukee Brewers @ Pittsburgh Pirates). Market -105 (~51% implied). Your best price -105 @ BetMGM is 3.3pp better than the sharp ref -120. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HASHOP_VALUE
Pittsburgh Pirates110100%+0.3u+29%
finalRyan O'Hearn UNDER 0.5 RBIs-350@BetMGM~77.8%Props1ushop +5.8pp+2.8pp vs fairW +0.29u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Ryan O'Hearn: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Ryan O'Hearn UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Milwaukee Brewers @ Pittsburgh Pirates). Market -350 (~78% implied). Your best price -350 @ BetMGM is 5.7pp better than the sharp ref -507. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Props4 bets · 3175%+1.3u+32%finalSpencer Horwitz UNDER 0.5 Hits-110@BetMGM~52.4%Propsshop +4.0pp+3.0pp vs fairW +0.91uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Spencer Horwitz: 0 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Spencer Horwitz UNDER 0.5 Hits (Milwaukee Brewers @ Pittsburgh Pirates). Market -110 (~52% implied). Your best price -110 @ BetMGM is 4.0pp better than the sharp ref -129. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalNick Gonzales UNDER 0.5 Runs-295@BetMGM~74.7%Propsshop +3.8pp+2.4pp vs fairW +0.34uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Nick Gonzales: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Nick Gonzales UNDER 0.5 Runs (Milwaukee Brewers @ Pittsburgh Pirates). Market -295 (~75% implied). Your best price -295 @ BetMGM is 3.8pp better than the sharp ref -365. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalRyan O'Hearn UNDER 0.5 Hits+100@BetMGM~50.0%Propsshop +4.3pp+3.6pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Ryan O'Hearn: 1 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Ryan O'Hearn UNDER 0.5 Hits (Milwaukee Brewers @ Pittsburgh Pirates). Market +100 (~50% implied). Your best price +100 @ BetMGM is 4.3pp better than the sharp ref -119. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalJake Mangum UNDER 0.5 Hits+105@BetMGM~48.8%Propsshop +3.4pp+2.7pp vs fairW +1.05uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Jake Mangum: 0 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Jake Mangum UNDER 0.5 Hits (Milwaukee Brewers @ Pittsburgh Pirates). Market +105 (~49% implied). Your best price +105 @ BetMGM is 3.4pp better than the sharp ref -109. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
▸F3 Total1 bets · 10100%+0.7u+71%finalF3 UNDER 2.5-140@Caesars~58.3%F3 Totalshop +2.8pp+1.2pp vs fairW +0.71uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Milwaukee Brewers 5 @ Pittsburgh Pirates 1 · total 6
MLB FIRST 3 INNINGS segment — F3 UNDER 2.5. Market: -140 (~58% implied). Your best price -140 @ Caesars is 2.8pp better than the sharp ref -157. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPERIODF3SHOP_VALUE
▸F5 Total1 bets · 10100%+1.1u+106%finalF5 UNDER 3.5no book price~48.5%F5 Total+1.1pp vs fairW +1.06uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Milwaukee Brewers 5 @ Pittsburgh Pirates 1 · total 6
MLB FIRST 5 INNINGS segment — F5 UNDER 3.5. Market: +106 (~49% implied). No price at your books; sharp ref +106.
MLBPERIODF5
▸F5 ML1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalPittsburgh Pirates F5 ML+230@BetMGM~30.3%F5 MLshop +3.0pp+1.1pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Milwaukee Brewers 5 @ Pittsburgh Pirates 1 · total 6
MLB FIRST 5 INNINGS segment — Pittsburgh Pirates F5 ML. Market: +230 (~30% implied). Your best price +230 @ BetMGM is 3.0pp better than the sharp ref +200. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPERIODF5SHOP_VALUE
▸Athletics@Tampa Bay RaysFINAL3:40 PMO/U2 propsF5 Total3-1+1.87u
📋 Tampa Bay Rays home vs Athletics · Probables: Jack Perkins (RHP, 6.14 ERA) (Athletics) @ Griffin Jax (RHP, 3.80 ERA) (Rays).
▸Props2 bets · 20100%+2.0u+100%finalJack Perkins UNDER 4.5 Hits Allowed+115@BetMGM~46.5%Props1ushop +1.6pp+3.4pp vs fairW +1.15u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Jack Perkins: 4 pit_H (line 4.5)
MLB player prop — Jack Perkins UNDER 4.5 Hits Allowed (Athletics @ Tampa Bay Rays). Market +115 (~47% implied). Your best price +115 @ BetMGM is 1.6pp better than the sharp ref +108. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HASHOP_VALUE
finalJack Perkins UNDER 2.5 Earned Runs-118@BetMGM~54.1%Props1ushop +4.2pp+2.4pp vs fairW +0.85u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Jack Perkins: 0 pit_ER (line 2.5)
MLB player prop — Jack Perkins UNDER 2.5 Earned Runs (Athletics @ Tampa Bay Rays). Market -118 (~54% implied). Your best price -118 @ BetMGM is 4.2pp better than the sharp ref -140. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_ERSHOP_VALUE
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game Total1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalOVER 8.5+118@Caesars~45.9%Game Totalshop +5.8pp+5.9pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Athletics 1 @ Tampa Bay Rays 2 · total 3
MLB — OVER 8.5. Caution: overs have hit only 45% on your book historically — this over runs against your measured bias. Our own record in MLB|Game Total: 92-136 (-44.75u) — this cell has bled for us. We're 8-5 (+2.41u) backing Tampa Bay Rays — they have paid us. Market read: pickem underdog (+118, ~46% implied). Your best price +118 @ Caesars is 5.8pp better than the sharp ref -107. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -107 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
MLBOVERSHOP_VALUERESEARCH
▸F5 Total1 bets · 10100%+0.9u+87%finalF5 UNDER 4.5-115@BetMGM~53.5%F5 Total+1.6pp vs fairW +0.87uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Athletics 1 @ Tampa Bay Rays 2 · total 3
MLB FIRST 5 INNINGS segment — F5 UNDER 4.5. Market: -115 (~53% implied). Your best price -115 @ BetMGM is 0.6pp better than the sharp ref -118. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPERIODF5
▸Chicago White Sox@Cleveland GuardiansFINAL3:40 PMO/U7 propsF5 Total2-6-5.00u
📋 Cleveland Guardians home vs Chicago White Sox · Probables: Chris Murphy (LHP, 4.68 ERA) (Sox) @ Foster Griffin (LHP, 3.67 ERA) (Guardians).
▸Props1 bet · 10100%+0.3u+33%finalSteven Kwan UNDER 0.5 RBIs-300@BetMGM~75.0%Props1ushop +5.4pp+2.3pp vs fairW +0.33u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Steven Kwan: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Steven Kwan UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Chicago White Sox @ Cleveland Guardians). Market -300 (~75% implied). Your best price -300 @ BetMGM is 5.4pp better than the sharp ref -410. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game Total1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalUNDER 8.5+105@Caesars~48.8%Game Totalshop +5.3pp+2.3pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Chicago White Sox 6 @ Cleveland Guardians 7 · total 13
MLB — UNDER 8.5. Leans UNDER: on your own settled record UNDERs hit 58% vs overs 45% — a real, measured market bias. Our own record in MLB|Game Total: 92-136 (-44.75u) — this cell has bled for us. We're 2-7 (-4.85u) backing Cleveland Guardians — they have cost us. Market read: pickem underdog (+105, ~49% implied). Your best price +105 @ Caesars is 5.3pp better than the sharp ref -118. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -115 @ betus is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
MLBUNDERSHOP_VALUERESEARCH
▸Props6 bets · 1420%-3.3u-67%1 no resultfinalTravis Bazzana UNDER 0.5 Hits+155@BetMGM~39.2%Propsshop +5.0pp+5.0pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Travis Bazzana: 2 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Travis Bazzana UNDER 0.5 Hits (Chicago White Sox @ Cleveland Guardians). Market +155 (~39% implied). Your best price +155 @ BetMGM is 5.0pp better than the sharp ref +126. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalTravis Bazzana UNDER 0.5 Runs-155@BetMGM~60.8%Propsshop +5.9pp+4.8pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Travis Bazzana: 2 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Travis Bazzana UNDER 0.5 Runs (Chicago White Sox @ Cleveland Guardians). Market -155 (~61% implied). Your best price -155 @ BetMGM is 5.9pp better than the sharp ref -200. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalNathaniel Lowe UNDER 0.5 Hits+140@BetMGM~41.7%Propsshop +3.6pp+3.5pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Nathaniel Lowe: 2 bat_H (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Nathaniel Lowe UNDER 0.5 Hits (Chicago White Sox @ Cleveland Guardians). Market +140 (~42% implied). Your best price +140 @ BetMGM is 3.6pp better than the sharp ref +121. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_HITSSHOP_VALUE
finalBraden Montgomery UNDER 0.5 Runs-210@BetMGM~67.7%Propsshop +4.3pp+3.0pp vs fairno resultUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Braden Montgomery: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Braden Montgomery UNDER 0.5 Runs (Chicago White Sox @ Cleveland Guardians). Market -210 (~68% implied). Your best price -210 @ BetMGM is 4.3pp better than the sharp ref -258. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalSteven Kwan UNDER 0.5 Runs-125@BetMGM~55.6%Propsshop +3.3pp+2.7pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Steven Kwan: 1 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Steven Kwan UNDER 0.5 Runs (Chicago White Sox @ Cleveland Guardians). Market -125 (~56% implied). Your best price -125 @ BetMGM is 3.3pp better than the sharp ref -143. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
finalMunetaka Murakami UNDER 0.5 Runs-150@BetMGM~60.0%Propsshop +3.1pp+2.3pp vs fairW +0.67uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Munetaka Murakami: 0 bat_R (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Munetaka Murakami UNDER 0.5 Runs (Chicago White Sox @ Cleveland Guardians). Market -150 (~60% implied). Your best price -150 @ BetMGM is 3.1pp better than the sharp ref -171. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
▸F5 Total1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalF5 UNDER 5.0-118@BetMGM~54.1%F5 Total+1.4pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Chicago White Sox 6 @ Cleveland Guardians 7 · total 13
MLB FIRST 5 INNINGS segment — F5 UNDER 5.0. Market: -118 (~54% implied). Your best price -118 @ BetMGM is 0.4pp better than the sharp ref -120. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPERIODF5
▸Los Angeles Dodgers@Cincinnati RedsFINAL3:40 PM3 propsF1 Total2-0+1.46u
📋 Cincinnati Reds home vs Los Angeles Dodgers · Probables: Yoshinobu Yamamoto (RHP, 2.51 ERA) (Dodgers) @ Rhett Lowder (RHP, 5.79 ERA) (Reds).
▸Props2 bets · 10100%+0.6u+62%1 no result
Los Angeles Dodgers110100%+0.6u+62%
finalMookie Betts UNDER 0.5 RBIs-160@BetMGM~61.5%Props1ushop +5.3pp+2.7pp vs fairW +0.62u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Mookie Betts: 0 bat_RBI (line 0.5)
MLB player prop — Mookie Betts UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Los Angeles Dodgers @ Cincinnati Reds). Market -160 (~62% implied). Your best price -160 @ BetMGM is 5.3pp better than the sharp ref -202. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
Cincinnati Reds11 no result
finalHector Rodriguez UNDER 0.5 RBIs-325@BetMGM~76.5%Props1ushop +6.0pp+3.0pp vs fairno result◆ MIDAS
Void voided in the ledger (no result ever arrived)
MLB player prop — Hector Rodriguez UNDER 0.5 RBIs (Los Angeles Dodgers @ Cincinnati Reds). Market -325 (~76% implied). Your best price -325 @ BetMGM is 6.0pp better than the sharp ref -470. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RBISHOP_VALUE
▸F1 Total1 bet · 10100%+0.8u+83%finalNRFI (Under 0.5, 1st inning) — Los Angeles Dodgers @ Cincinnati Reds-120@BetMGM~54.5%F1 Total1u+2.5pp vs fairW +0.83u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Los Angeles Dodgers 4 @ Cincinnati Reds 0 · total 4
MLB 1ST INNING segment — NRFI (Under 0.5, 1st inning) — Los Angeles Dodgers @ Cincinnati Reds. Market: -120 (~55% implied). Your best price -120 @ BetMGM is 0.6pp better than the sharp ref -123. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. NRFI is a flagged focus market — tracked every game to measure whether it's a real edge for us.
MLBPERIODNRFI
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Props1 bets · 1 no resultfinalHector Rodriguez UNDER 0.5 Runs-275@BetMGM~73.3%Propsshop +3.6pp+2.2pp vs fairno resultUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Void voided in the ledger (no result ever arrived)
MLB player prop — Hector Rodriguez UNDER 0.5 Runs (Los Angeles Dodgers @ Cincinnati Reds). Market -275 (~73% implied). Your best price -275 @ BetMGM is 3.6pp better than the sharp ref -333. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected.
MLBPROPPROP_RUNSSHOP_VALUE
MiLB23bets91243%-4.5u-21%2 no result▸Reno Aces@Sacramento River CatsFINAL6:45 PMML0-1-1.00u
📋 Sacramento River Cats home vs Reno Aces.
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game ML1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalReno Aces ML+100@Caesars~50.0%Game ML-3.1pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Reno Aces 2 @ Sacramento River Cats 9
MiLB — Reno Aces ML. Our own record in MiLB|Game ML: 47-50 (-10.58u) — this cell has bled for us. PICKEM band is 34-38 (-5.46u) on our book. Market read: pickem underdog (+100, ~50% implied). Your best price +100 @ Caesars ≈ sharp ref +100 (no shopping edge). (Global best +101 @ onexbet is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
MiLBML_DOGPICKEMRESEARCH
▸Oklahoma City Comets@El Paso ChihuahuasFINAL5:35 PMSpreadO/U1-1-0.09u
📋 El Paso Chihuahuas home vs Oklahoma City Comets.
▸Spread1 bet · 010%-1.0u-100%finalOklahoma City Comets -2.5-120@Caesars~54.5%Spread-3.4pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Oklahoma City Comets 5 @ El Paso Chihuahuas 11
MiLB spread — Oklahoma City Comets -2.5 (Oklahoma City Comets @ El Paso Chihuahuas). Market -120 (~55% implied). Your best price -120 @ Caesars is 0.4pp better than the sharp ref -122. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. De-vigged edge -3.3pp — below the 2.0pp bar. Logged, not tracked.
MiLBSPREAD
▸Game Total1 bet · 10100%+0.9u+91%finalOVER 14.5-110@Caesars~52.4%Game Total0u-3.4pp vs fairW +0.91u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Oklahoma City Comets 5 @ El Paso Chihuahuas 11 · total 16
MiLB — OVER 14.5. Market read: pickem favorite (-110, ~52% implied). Your best price -110 @ Caesars ≈ sharp ref -110 (no shopping edge). (Global best -105 @ bovada is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
MiLBOVER
▸Salt Lake Bees@Albuquerque IsotopesFINAL5:35 PMMLO/U0-2-2.00u
📋 Albuquerque Isotopes home vs Salt Lake Bees.
▸Game Total1 bet · 010%-1.0u-100%finalOVER 13.5-110@Caesars~52.4%Game Total0u-3.4pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Salt Lake Bees 7 @ Albuquerque Isotopes 5 · total 12
MiLB — OVER 13.5. We're 1-7 (-6.17u) backing Albuquerque Isotopes — they have cost us. Market read: pickem favorite (-110, ~52% implied). Your best price -110 @ Caesars ≈ sharp ref -110 (no shopping edge). No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
MiLBOVERRESEARCH
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game ML1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalAlbuquerque Isotopes ML-150@Caesars~60.0%Game ML-2.7pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Salt Lake Bees 7 @ Albuquerque Isotopes 5
MiLB — Albuquerque Isotopes ML. Home side — a small, real edge across sports. Our own record in MiLB|Game ML: 46-48 (-9.42u) — this cell has bled for us. MOD_FAV band is 61-39 (+5.65u) on our book. We're 1-7 (-6.17u) backing Albuquerque Isotopes — they have cost us. Market read: mod fav favorite (-150, ~60% implied). Your best price -150 @ Caesars is 0.8pp better than the sharp ref -155. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -143 @ onexbet is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
MiLBML_FAVMOD_FAVRESEARCH
▸Las Vegas Aviators@Sugar Land Space CowboysFINAL5:05 PMML1-0+0.93u
📋 Sugar Land Space Cowboys home vs Las Vegas Aviators.
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game ML1 bets · 10100%+0.9u+93%finalLas Vegas Aviators MLno book price~51.9%Game ML-3.0pp vs fairW +0.93uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Las Vegas Aviators 5 @ Sugar Land Space Cowboys 2
MiLB — Las Vegas Aviators ML. Our own record in MiLB|Game ML: 46-48 (-9.42u) — this cell has bled for us. PICKEM band is 34-38 (-5.46u) on our book. We're 11-3 (+6.43u) backing Las Vegas Aviators — they have paid us. Market read: pickem favorite (-108, ~52% implied). No price at your books yet; sharp ref -108. (Global best -108 @ fanduel is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
MiLBML_FAVPICKEMRESEARCH
▸Tacoma Rainiers@Round Rock ExpressFINAL4:45 PMMLO/U1-1-0.17u
📋 Round Rock Express home vs Tacoma Rainiers.
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game ML1 bets · 10100%+0.8u+83%finalRound Rock Express ML-120@Caesars~54.5%Game ML-3.5pp vs fairW +0.83uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Tacoma Rainiers 2 @ Round Rock Express 9
MiLB — Round Rock Express ML. Home side — a small, real edge across sports. Our own record in MiLB|Game ML: 46-48 (-9.42u) — this cell has bled for us. MOD_FAV band is 61-39 (+5.65u) on our book. We're 6-4 (+1.70u) backing Round Rock Express — they have paid us. Market read: mod fav favorite (-120, ~55% implied). Your best price -120 @ Caesars ≈ sharp ref -120 (no shopping edge). (Global best -112 @ onexbet is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
MiLBML_FAVMOD_FAVRESEARCH
▸Game Total1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalUNDER 9.5no book price~51.9%Game Total-3.5pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Tacoma Rainiers 2 @ Round Rock Express 9 · total 11
MiLB — UNDER 9.5. We're 6-4 (+1.70u) backing Round Rock Express — they have paid us. Market read: pickem favorite (-108, ~52% implied). No price at your books yet; sharp ref -108. (Global best -108 @ fanduel is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game ML1 bets · 10100%+0.8u+77%finalNashville Sounds ML-130@Caesars~56.5%Game ML-3.5pp vs fairW +0.77uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Memphis Redbirds 4 @ Nashville Sounds 5
MiLB — Nashville Sounds ML. Home side — a small, real edge across sports. Our own record in MiLB|Game ML: 46-48 (-9.42u) — this cell has bled for us. MOD_FAV band is 61-39 (+5.65u) on our book. Market read: mod fav favorite (-130, ~57% implied). Your best price -130 @ Caesars ≈ sharp ref -130 (no shopping edge). (Global best -122 @ onexbet is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
MiLBML_FAVMOD_FAVRESEARCH
▸Game Total1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalOVER 9.5no book price~50.0%Game Total-3.2pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Memphis Redbirds 4 @ Nashville Sounds 5 · total 9
MiLB — OVER 9.5. Market read: pickem underdog (+100, ~50% implied). No price at your books yet; sharp ref +100. (Global best +100 @ fanduel is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
▸Game Total1 bet · 1 no resultfinalUNDER 10.5-105@Caesars~51.2%Game Total0u-3.2pp vs fairno result◆ MIDAS
Settled on Iowa Cubs @ Omaha Storm Chasers — postponed
MiLB — UNDER 10.5. Market read: pickem favorite (-105, ~51% implied). Your best price -105 @ Caesars ≈ sharp ref -105 (no shopping edge). (Global best +102 @ onexbet is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
MiLBUNDER
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game ML1 bets · 1 no resultfinalOmaha Storm Chasers ML-120@Caesars~54.5%Game ML-3.5pp vs fairno resultUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Iowa Cubs @ Omaha Storm Chasers — postponed
MiLB — Omaha Storm Chasers ML. Home side — a small, real edge across sports. Our own record in MiLB|Game ML: 46-48 (-9.42u) — this cell has bled for us. MOD_FAV band is 61-39 (+5.65u) on our book. Market read: mod fav favorite (-120, ~55% implied). Your best price -120 @ Caesars ≈ sharp ref -120 (no shopping edge). (Global best -114 @ onexbet is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
📋 Scranton/Wilkes-Barre RailRiders home vs Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp.
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game ML1 bets · 10100%+0.7u+67%finalScranton/Wilkes-Barre RailRiders ML-150@Caesars~60.0%Game ML-2.7pp vs fairW +0.67uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp 5 @ Scranton/Wilkes-Barre RailRiders 6
MiLB — Scranton/Wilkes-Barre RailRiders ML. Home side — a small, real edge across sports. Our own record in MiLB|Game ML: 46-48 (-9.42u) — this cell has bled for us. MOD_FAV band is 61-39 (+5.65u) on our book. Market read: mod fav favorite (-150, ~60% implied). Your best price -150 @ Caesars is 0.8pp better than the sharp ref -155. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -143 @ onexbet is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
MiLBML_FAVMOD_FAVRESEARCH
▸Game Total1 bets · 10100%+1.0u+96%finalOVER 10.5no book price~51.0%Game Total-3.4pp vs fairW +0.96uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp 5 @ Scranton/Wilkes-Barre RailRiders 6 · total 11
MiLB — OVER 10.5. Market read: pickem favorite (-104, ~51% implied). No price at your books yet; sharp ref -104. (Global best -104 @ fanduel is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
MiLBOVER
▸Lehigh Valley IronPigs@Syracuse MetsFINAL3:35 PMO/U0-1-1.00u
📋 Syracuse Mets home vs Lehigh Valley IronPigs.
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game Total1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalOVER 11.5no book price~50.0%Game Total-3.4pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Lehigh Valley IronPigs 1 @ Syracuse Mets 9 · total 10
MiLB — OVER 11.5. Market read: pickem underdog (+100, ~50% implied). No price at your books yet; sharp ref +100. (Global best +100 @ fanduel is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game ML1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalCharlotte Knights ML-150@Caesars~60.0%Game ML-2.7pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Charlotte Knights 2 @ Norfolk Tides 4
MiLB — Charlotte Knights ML. Our own record in MiLB|Game ML: 46-48 (-9.42u) — this cell has bled for us. MOD_FAV band is 61-39 (+5.65u) on our book. We're 7-1 (+5.16u) backing Charlotte Knights — they have paid us. Market read: mod fav favorite (-150, ~60% implied). Your best price -150 @ Caesars is 0.8pp better than the sharp ref -155. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -141 @ onexbet is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
MiLBML_FAVMOD_FAVRESEARCH
▸Game Total1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalOVER 9.5no book price~52.8%Game Total-3.4pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Charlotte Knights 2 @ Norfolk Tides 4 · total 6
MiLB — OVER 9.5. Market read: pickem favorite (-112, ~53% implied). No price at your books yet; sharp ref -112. (Global best -112 @ fanduel is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
MiLBOVER
▸St. Paul Saints@Columbus ClippersFINAL3:35 PMMLO/U0-2-2.00u
📋 Columbus Clippers home vs St. Paul Saints.
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game ML1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalSt. Paul Saints ML-120@Caesars~54.5%Game ML-3.5pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on St. Paul Saints 0 @ Columbus Clippers 1
MiLB — St. Paul Saints ML. Our own record in MiLB|Game ML: 46-48 (-9.42u) — this cell has bled for us. MOD_FAV band is 61-39 (+5.65u) on our book. We're 8-4 (+3.12u) backing St. Paul Saints — they have paid us. Market read: mod fav favorite (-120, ~55% implied). Your best price -120 @ Caesars ≈ sharp ref -120 (no shopping edge). (Global best -114 @ onexbet is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
MiLBML_FAVMOD_FAVRESEARCH
▸Game Total1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalOVER 11.5no book price~52.8%Game Total-3.4pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on St. Paul Saints 0 @ Columbus Clippers 1 · total 1
MiLB — OVER 11.5. Market read: pickem favorite (-112, ~53% implied). No price at your books yet; sharp ref -112. (Global best -112 @ fanduel is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game ML1 bets · 10100%+0.7u+75%finalIndianapolis Indians MLno book price~57.3%Game ML-3.1pp vs fairW +0.75uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Indianapolis Indians 8 @ Gwinnett Stripers 6
MiLB — Indianapolis Indians ML. Our own record in MiLB|Game ML: 46-48 (-9.42u) — this cell has bled for us. MOD_FAV band is 61-39 (+5.65u) on our book. We're 7-4 (+2.80u) backing Indianapolis Indians — they have paid us. Market read: mod fav favorite (-134, ~57% implied). No price at your books yet; sharp ref -134. (Global best -134 @ fanduel is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
MiLBML_FAVMOD_FAVRESEARCH
▸Game Total1 bets · 10100%+0.9u+89%finalOVER 8.5no book price~52.8%Game Total-3.4pp vs fairW +0.89uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Indianapolis Indians 8 @ Gwinnett Stripers 6 · total 14
MiLB — OVER 8.5. We're 6-4 (+1.28u) backing Gwinnett Stripers — they have paid us. Market read: pickem favorite (-112, ~53% implied). No price at your books yet; sharp ref -112. (Global best -112 @ fanduel is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
MiLBOVERRESEARCH
▸Durham Bulls@Worcester Red SoxFINAL3:05 PMMLO/U1-1-0.17u
📋 Worcester Red Sox home vs Durham Bulls.
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game ML1 bets · 10100%+0.8u+83%finalWorcester Red Sox ML-120@Caesars~54.5%Game ML-3.1pp vs fairW +0.83uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Durham Bulls 1 @ Worcester Red Sox 2
MiLB — Worcester Red Sox ML. Home side — a small, real edge across sports. Our own record in MiLB|Game ML: 46-48 (-9.42u) — this cell has bled for us. MOD_FAV band is 61-39 (+5.65u) on our book. Market read: mod fav favorite (-120, ~55% implied). Your best price -120 @ Caesars is 0.4pp better than the sharp ref -122. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -114 @ onexbet is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
MiLBML_FAVMOD_FAVRESEARCH
▸Game Total1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalOVER 11.5no book price~51.5%Game Total-3.5pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Durham Bulls 1 @ Worcester Red Sox 2 · total 3
MiLB — OVER 11.5. Market read: pickem favorite (-106, ~51% implied). No price at your books yet; sharp ref -106. (Global best -106 @ fanduel is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
📋 Tokyo Yakult Swallows home vs Hiroshima Toyo Carp.
▸Game Total1 bet · 1 awaiting result🕒 2:00 AMOVER 7.5+110@Caesars~47.6%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt over 6.5 for cushion1ushop +7.5pp+5.5pp vs fairpending◆ MIDAS
NPB — OVER 7.5. Market read: pickem underdog (+110, ~48% implied). Your best price +110 @ Caesars is 7.5pp better than the sharp ref -123. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -123 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 90): Your 110@Caesars vs a sharp -123 — +5.5pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 48%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+5.5pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is OVER 7.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: over 6.5 for cushion
NPBOVERSHOP_VALUE
▸Yomiuri Giants@Yokohama DeNA BayStarsFINAL2:00 AMO/U1 bet
📋 Yokohama DeNA BayStars home vs Yomiuri Giants.
▸Game Total1 bet · 1 awaiting result🕒 2:00 AMUNDER 6.5+100@Caesars~50.0%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt under 7 for cushion1ushop +6.1pp+4.0pp vs fairpending◆ MIDAS
NPB — UNDER 6.5. Market read: pickem underdog (+100, ~50% implied). Your best price +100 @ Caesars is 6.1pp better than the sharp ref -128. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -128 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 88): Your 100@Caesars vs a sharp -128 — +4.0pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 50%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+4.0pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is UNDER 6.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: under 7 for cushion
NPBUNDERSHOP_VALUE
▸Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks@Orix BuffaloesFINAL2:00 AMO/U1 bet
📋 Orix Buffaloes home vs Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks.
▸Game Total1 bet · 1 awaiting result🕒 2:00 AMUNDER 6.5+105@Caesars~48.8%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt under 7 for cushion1ushop +5.6pp+3.5pp vs fairpending◆ MIDAS
NPB — UNDER 6.5. Market read: pickem underdog (+105, ~49% implied). Your best price +105 @ Caesars is 5.6pp better than the sharp ref -119. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -119 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 85): Your 105@Caesars vs a sharp -119 — +3.5pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 49%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+3.5pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is UNDER 6.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: under 7 for cushion
NPBUNDERSHOP_VALUE
▸Chunichi Dragons@Hanshin TigersFINAL2:00 AMO/U1 bet
📋 Hanshin Tigers home vs Chunichi Dragons.
▸Game Total1 bet · 1 awaiting result🕒 2:00 AMUNDER 6.5-115@Caesars~53.5%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt under 7 for cushion1ushop +4.3pp+2.1pp vs fairpending◆ MIDAS
NPB — UNDER 6.5. Market read: pickem favorite (-115, ~53% implied). Your best price -115 @ Caesars is 4.3pp better than the sharp ref -137. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -137 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 75): Your -115@Caesars vs a sharp -137 — +2.1pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 54%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+2.1pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is UNDER 6.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: under 7 for cushion
▸Game Total1 bet · 10100%+1.2u+120%finalOVER 3.5+120@BetMGM~45.5%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt over 3 for cushion1ushop +9.5pp+7.2pp vs fairW +1.20u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Tottenham Hotspur 1 @ Liverpool 3 · total 4
EFL Cup — OVER 3.5. Market read: dog underdog (+120, ~45% implied). Your best price +120 @ BetMGM is 9.5pp better than the sharp ref -122. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -122 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 90): Your 120@BetMGM vs a sharp -122 — +7.2pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 46%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+7.2pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is OVER 3.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: over 3 for cushion
EFL CupOVERSHOP_VALUE
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Draw1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalDraw+300@BetMGM~25.0%DrawZeus PASSshop +1.2pp-0.0pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Tottenham Hotspur 1 @ Liverpool 3
EFL Cup — Draw. LONGSHOT band is 13-48 (+5.15u) on our book. Market read: longshot underdog (+300, ~25% implied). Your best price +300 @ BetMGM is 1.2pp better than the sharp ref +282. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best +310 @ betvictor is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
Zeus PASS (conf 58): Your 300@BetMGM vs a sharp 282 — level with the de-vigged fair price. Implied 25%. No line-shopping edge and no situational reason on this draw — it's a vig-paying coin flip. Pass.
▸Game Total1 bet · 010%-1.0u-100%finalUNDER 2.5+115@BetMGM~46.5%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt under 3 for cushion1ushop +8.4pp+6.2pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Arsenal 4 @ Ipswich Town 2 · total 6
EFL Cup — UNDER 2.5. Market read: pickem underdog (+115, ~47% implied). Your best price +115 @ BetMGM is 8.4pp better than the sharp ref -122. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -122 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 90): Your 115@BetMGM vs a sharp -122 — +6.2pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 46%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+6.2pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is UNDER 2.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: under 3 for cushion
EFL CupUNDERSHOP_VALUE
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Draw1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalDraw+425@BetMGM~19.0%DrawZeus PASSshop +1.2pp+0.2pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Arsenal 4 @ Ipswich Town 2
EFL Cup — Draw. LONGSHOT band is 13-48 (+5.15u) on our book. Market read: longshot underdog (+425, ~19% implied). Your best price +425 @ BetMGM is 1.2pp better than the sharp ref +393. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
Zeus PASS (conf 58): Your 425@BetMGM vs a sharp 393 — +0.2pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 19%. No line-shopping edge and no situational reason on this draw — it's a vig-paying coin flip. Pass.
+0.2pp vs fairdrawlongshot — high varianceedge too thin
⚠ risk: little/no edge — skip it
EFL CupML_DRAWLONGSHOTSHOP_VALUERESEARCH
▸Fulham@West Ham UnitedFINAL11:45 AMO/U0-1-1.00u
📋 West Ham United home vs Fulham.
▸Game Total1 bet · 010%-1.0u-100%finalUNDER 2.5+120@BetMGM~45.5%Game Total1ushop +8.2pp+6.6pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Fulham 3 @ West Ham United 2 · total 5
EFL Cup — UNDER 2.5. Market read: dog underdog (+120, ~45% implied). Your best price +120 @ BetMGM is 8.2pp better than the sharp ref -116. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -116 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
▸Game Total1 bet · 10100%+1.2u+125%finalOVER 3.5+125@BetMGM~44.4%Game Total1ushop +7.9pp+6.2pp vs fairW +1.25u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Barnsley 3 @ Peterborough United 3 · total 6
EFL Cup — OVER 3.5. Market read: dog underdog (+125, ~44% implied). Your best price +125 @ BetMGM is 7.9pp better than the sharp ref -110. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -110 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
▸Game Total1 bet · 10100%+1.2u+125%finalOVER 3.5+125@BetMGM~44.4%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt over 3 for cushion1ushop +9.5pp+6.8pp vs fairW +1.25u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Östers IF 3 @ IFK Värnamo 1 · total 4
Superettan — OVER 3.5. Market read: dog underdog (+125, ~44% implied). Your best price +125 @ BetMGM is 9.5pp better than the sharp ref -117. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -116 @ betus is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 90): Your 125@BetMGM vs a sharp -117 — +6.8pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 44%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+6.8pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is OVER 3.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: over 3 for cushion
SuperettanOVERSHOP_VALUE
▸Sandvikens IF@IK BrageFINAL10:00 AMO/U1-0+1.20u
📋 IK Brage home vs Sandvikens IF.
▸Game Total1 bet · 10100%+1.2u+120%finalUNDER 2.5+120@BetMGM~45.5%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt under 3 for cushion1ushop +9.5pp+6.8pp vs fairW +1.20u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Sandvikens IF 1 @ IK Brage 1 · total 2
Superettan — UNDER 2.5. Market read: dog underdog (+120, ~45% implied). Your best price +120 @ BetMGM is 9.5pp better than the sharp ref -122. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -121 @ betus is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 90): Your 120@BetMGM vs a sharp -122 — +6.8pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 46%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+6.8pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is UNDER 2.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: under 3 for cushion
▸Game Total1 bet · 010%-1.0u-100%finalUNDER 2.5+115@BetMGM~46.5%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt under 3 for cushion1ushop +8.2pp+6.2pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Millwall 2 @ Middlesbrough 2 · total 4
EFL Champ — UNDER 2.5. Our own record in EFL Champ|Game Total: 10-14 (-3.19u) — this cell has bled for us. Market read: pickem underdog (+115, ~47% implied). Your best price +115 @ BetMGM is 8.2pp better than the sharp ref -121. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -121 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 90): Your 115@BetMGM vs a sharp -121 — +6.2pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 46%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+6.2pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is UNDER 2.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: under 3 for cushion
▸Game Total1 bet · 010%-1.0u-100%finalOVER 2.5-105@BetMGM~51.2%Game Total1ushop +3.7pp+2.1pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Lincoln City 1 @ Bristol City 0 · total 1
EFL Champ — OVER 2.5. Our own record in EFL Champ|Game Total: 10-14 (-3.19u) — this cell has bled for us. Market read: pickem favorite (-105, ~51% implied). Your best price -105 @ BetMGM is 3.7pp better than the sharp ref -122. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -122 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
EFL ChampOVERSHOP_VALUERESEARCH
La Liga2bets020%-2.0u-100%▸Real Madrid@Elche CFFINAL12:30 PMDraw0-1-1.00u
📋 Elche CF home vs Real Madrid.
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Draw1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalDraw+650@BetMGM~13.3%Draw+0.2pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Real Madrid 3 @ Elche CF 2
La Liga — Draw. LONGSHOT band is 13-48 (+5.15u) on our book. Market read: longshot underdog (+650, ~13% implied). Your best price +650 @ BetMGM is 0.7pp better than the sharp ref +611. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best +720 @ smarkets is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.) No edge signal fired — logged for the board, not tracked (unless needed to hit the daily floor).
La LigaML_DRAWLONGSHOTRESEARCH
▸Valencia@AlavésFINAL11:00 AMO/U0-1-1.00u
📋 Alavés home vs Valencia.
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game Total1 bets · 010%-1.0u-100%finalOVER 2.5+120@BetMGM~45.5%Game TotalZeus PASSshop +4.8pp+3.4pp vs fairL -1.00uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Valencia 1 @ Alavés 0 · total 1
La Liga — OVER 2.5. Our own record in La Liga|Game Total: 4-15 (-10.00u) — this cell has bled for us. Market read: dog underdog (+120, ~45% implied). Your best price +120 @ BetMGM is 4.8pp better than the sharp ref -101. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -101 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus PASS (conf 58): Your 120@BetMGM vs a sharp -101 — +3.4pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 46%. This total is a market we have demoted while we keep grading it. We are not putting a number on it.
▸Game Total1 bet · 010%-1.0u-100%finalOVER 3.5+125@BetMGM~44.4%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt over 3 for cushion1ushop +10.3pp+8.3pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Kilmarnock 1 @ Hibernian 0 · total 1
Scotland Prem — OVER 3.5. Market read: dog underdog (+125, ~44% implied). Your best price +125 @ BetMGM is 10.3pp better than the sharp ref -121. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -121 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 90): Your 125@BetMGM vs a sharp -121 — +8.3pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 44%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+8.3pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is OVER 3.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: over 3 for cushion
▸Game Total1 bet · 10100%+1.2u+120%finalOVER 4.5+120@BetMGM~45.5%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt over 4 for cushion1ushop +8.5pp+6.2pp vs fairW +1.20u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Willem II 1 @ Ajax 5 · total 6
Eredivisie — OVER 4.5. Our own record in Eredivisie|Game Total: 7-6 (+2.20u) — a measured edge here. Market read: dog underdog (+120, ~45% implied). Your best price +120 @ BetMGM is 8.5pp better than the sharp ref -117. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -108 @ lowvig is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 90): Your 120@BetMGM vs a sharp -117 — +6.2pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 46%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+6.2pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is OVER 4.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: over 4 for cushion
▸Game Total1 bet · 10100%+1.1u+115%finalOVER 3.5+115@BetMGM~46.5%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt over 3 for cushion1ushop +4.2pp+2.3pp vs fairW +1.15u◆ MIDAS
Settled on FC Sion 5 @ Grasshopper Zürich 2 · total 7
Swiss SL — OVER 3.5. Market read: pickem underdog (+115, ~47% implied). Your best price +115 @ BetMGM is 4.2pp better than the sharp ref -103. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -103 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 76): Your 115@BetMGM vs a sharp -103 — +2.3pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 46%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+2.3pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is OVER 3.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: over 3 for cushion
Swiss SLOVERSHOP_VALUE
Italy Coppa Italia1bet010%-1.0u-100%▸Pisa@FiorentinaFINAL12:00 PMO/U0-1-1.00u
📋 Fiorentina home vs Pisa.
▸Game Total1 bet · 010%-1.0u-100%finalUNDER 2.5+130@BetMGM~43.5%Game TotalZeus BET⇄ alt under 3 for cushion1.5ushop +23.6pp+18.2pp vs fairL -1.00u◆ MIDAS
Settled on Pisa 0 @ Fiorentina 3 · total 3
Italy Coppa Italia — UNDER 2.5. Market read: dog underdog (+130, ~43% implied). Your best price +130 @ BetMGM is 23.6pp better than the sharp ref -204. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -175 @ onexbet is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Zeus BET (conf 90): Your 130@BetMGM vs a sharp -204 — +18.2pp against the de-vigged fair price. Implied 44%. On this total the number is better than the sharp fair price. That is the read; it is not a forecast, and our record on this market is on the page next to it.
+18.2pp vs fairtotal
⚠ risk: edge is line-shopping only; variance normal
⇄ The line is UNDER 2.5 — but Zeus would rather take the alt: under 3 for cushion
Italy Coppa ItaliaUNDERSHOP_VALUE
Brazil Série B1bet10100%+1.1u+110%▸Operario PR@Nautico PEFINAL3:30 PMO/U1-0+1.10u
📋 Nautico PE home vs Operario PR.
▸UNPROVEN & SHADOWlogged and graded in full — not markets we would tell you to follow yet▸Game Total1 bets · 10100%+1.1u+110%finalOVER 2.5+110@BetMGM~47.6%Game Totalshop +4.1pp+2.4pp vs fairW +1.10uUNPROVEN — not a play we'd tail
Settled on Operario PR 3 @ Nautico PE 3 · total 6
Brazil Série B — OVER 2.5. Our own record in Brazil Série B|Game Total: 6-21 (-13.67u) — this cell has bled for us. Market read: pickem underdog (+110, ~48% implied). Your best price +110 @ BetMGM is 4.1pp better than the sharp ref -107. Recorded as price quality — it is not why this pick was selected. (Global best -107 @ pinnacle is an offshore/other book you don't use — ignored.)
Brazil Série BOVERSHOP_VALUERESEARCH
History · every tracked bet, by sport, dated
All sportsMLB 9311NFL 46WNBA 287NCAAF 283UFC/MMA 178MLS 201ATP Tennis 889WTA Tennis 548MiLB 1006NPB 309Argentina 259KBO 225Brazil Série B 142Brasileirão 111Poland Ekstraklasa 102Superettan 94Allsvenskan 85EFL Cup 80Veikkausliiga 80Concacaf Leagues Cup 79Eliteserien 73Chile Primera 72China SL 71Korea Kleague1 69Superliga 66UCL Qual 65Swiss SL 64Japan J League 58EFL Champ 57Eredivisie 57Portugal Primeira Liga 54CFL 51Aussie Rules AFL 51Lacrosse PLL 50Russia Prem 502. Bundesliga 46Spain Segunda Division 46EFL League 1 45Sudamericana 45Belgium 1st 43Austria Bund. 43NRL 43Scotland Prem 41France Ligue Two 39Ireland 39La Liga 35Italy Coppa Italia 35Liga MX 35Germany Liga3 35NBA SL 28Italy Serie B 25EPL 22Serie A 21EFL League 2 20NFL Pre 20Turkey Super League 18Saudi Arabia Pro League 18Rugbyleague Nrlw 17Cricket International T20 17Greece Super League 16Americanfootball Ncaaf Fcs 16Cricket The Hundred 16Cricket Odi 14Bundesliga 13Uefa Champs League 13Cricket The Hundred Womens 13Ligue 1 12Libertadores 11Cricket Test Match 8DFB-Pokal 6Fa Cup 3Aussierules Aflw 2Cricket Caribbean Premier League 2World Cup 2Uefa Champs League Women 1
Game MLGame TotalSpreadPropsAllPendingWonLostLocksLeansFades
Showing clear
Tap the + on any bet to add it to your personal tracker & bankroll.
What this is good atevery market with 30+ graded bets, ranked by profit. Tap one to filter the days below.
3,644 graded bets61 days2026-07-17 → 2026-09-15-177.0u overallbreak-even at a standard −110 price is 52.4%
In profit · 7 markets
MLBF5 Total64-57-10308 no result53%+5.1u+4.2%121 bets
MLBF3 ML36-35-3049 no result51%+5.1u+7.2%71 bets
ArgentinaGame Total21-2377 no result48%+4.6u+10.5%44 bets
MLBF3 Total67-5436 no result55%+3.4u+2.8%121 bets
MLBGame ML45-35301 no result56%+2.5u+3.2%80 bets
NCAAFSpread19-1753%+0.7u+1.9%36 bets
MLSGame Total18-2059 no result47%+0.4u+1.0%38 bets
In loss · 7 markets, -168.8u between them
MLBF5 ML15-24-8310 no result38%-2.3u-5.8%39 bets
MiLBGame Total62-60257 no result51%-2.9u-2.3%122 bets
MLBF1 Total17-18325 no result49%-3.6u-10.3%35 bets
NFLProps18-202 no result47%-4.3u-11.2%38 bets
MiLBGame ML52-52250 no result50%-8.6u-8.3%104 bets
MLBGame Total93-141-6282 no result40%-48.6u-20.8%234 bets
MLBProps1083-8514729 no result56%-98.6u-5.1%1934 bets
Every bet MIDAS has published is in here, winners and losers, graded from final scores. Markets under 30 graded bets are still in the day list below — they are just too small to rank.
By dayAll time7 days30 days90 days
MIDAS Track Record · every pick, logged before kickoff, graded from the final score — nothing hidden
Loading the record…
1
Logged before kickoff. Every pick is timestamped the moment MIDAS posts it — you see when, and the price it locked.
2
Graded from the official final. Our server settles it from real scores — never a self-reported result, never editable after.
3
Wins and losses, same board. The whole record is here — cold streaks and all. No cherry-picking.
AllWinsLossesPush
3,695 settled bets across 10 groups and 23 bet types. Ordered biggest-first by number of settled bets — the markets MIDAS actually bets most, whether they win or lose.
The biggest markets · by how much we bet them
Every market, ranked · 8 markets with 50+ settled bets · 4 profitable, 4 not · winners and losers on the same scale.
Strongest marketMLB · F5 Total+5.1u64-57 · +4.2% ROI over 121 settled bets
Player PropsMLB
-98.6u1083-851 · -5.1% · 1934 bets
Total (O/U)MLB
-48.6u93-141 · -20.8% · 234 bets
Total (O/U)MiLB
-2.9u62-60 · -2.3% · 122 bets
F5 TotalMLB
+5.1u64-57 · +4.2% · 121 bets
F3 TotalMLB
+3.4u67-54 · +2.8% · 121 bets
MoneylineMiLB
-8.6u52-52 · -8.3% · 104 bets
MoneylineMLB
+2.5u45-35 · +3.2% · 80 bets
F3 MLMLB
+5.1u36-35 · +7.2% · 71 bets
← losseswins →
+ 44 markets still building a sample — under 50 bets
Total (O/U)Argentina
+4.6u21-23 · +10.5% · 44 bets
F5 MLMLB
-2.3u15-24 · -5.8% · 39 bets
Player PropsNFL
-4.3u18-20 · -11.2% · 38 bets
Total (O/U)MLS
+0.4u18-20 · +1.0% · 38 bets
Spread / Run lineNCAAF
+0.7u19-17 · +1.9% · 36 bets
F1 TotalMLB
-3.6u17-18 · -10.3% · 35 bets
Total (O/U)Brazil Série B
-12.6u7-21 · -44.9% · 28 bets
Total (O/U)EFL Champ
-5.2u10-16 · -20.0% · 26 bets
MoneylineNCAAF
-0.4u10-16 · -1.6% · 26 bets
Player PropsWNBA
+4.0u15-9 · +16.7% · 24 bets
Total (O/U)EFL League 1
-1.1u11-13 · -4.7% · 24 bets
Total (O/U)NCAAF
-0.8u11-11 · -3.9% · 22 bets
Total (O/U)La Liga
-12.0u4-17 · -57.1% · 21 bets
Total (O/U)Spain Segunda Division
-9.2u5-15 · -46.1% · 20 bets
Total (O/U)Portugal Primeira Liga
+8.4u13-6 · +44.0% · 19 bets
Total (O/U)Italy Serie B
-6.3u6-13 · -33.3% · 19 bets
Total (O/U)Superliga
-7.2u5-13 · -39.7% · 18 bets
Spread / Run lineMiLB
+5.2u11-7 · +28.8% · 18 bets
Total (O/U)Serie A
+2.7u9-8 · +15.9% · 17 bets
Total (O/U)Americanfootball Ncaaf Fcs
-0.8u8-8 · -5.2% · 16 bets
Total (O/U)Eredivisie
+3.4u8-6 · +24.3% · 14 bets
Total (O/U)Bundesliga
+8.7u10-3 · +66.9% · 13 bets
Total (O/U)Greece Super League
-6.4u3-10 · -49.0% · 13 bets
Total (O/U)Allsvenskan
+4.3u8-5 · +33.3% · 13 bets
Total (O/U)Ligue 1
+3.5u7-5 · +29.2% · 12 bets
Total (O/U)Swiss SL
-1.1u5-7 · -9.6% · 12 bets
Total (O/U)Brasileirão
+1.0u6-6 · +8.6% · 12 bets
Total (O/U)EPL
-8.8u1-10 · -80.0% · 11 bets
Total (O/U)Uefa Champs League
-3.5u3-7 · -34.5% · 10 bets
Total (O/U)Scotland Prem
-3.2u3-7 · -32.5% · 10 bets
Total (O/U)Chile Primera
-1.6u4-6 · -15.5% · 10 bets
Total (O/U)Superettan
+1.1u5-5 · +10.5% · 10 bets
Total (O/U)2. Bundesliga
-6.8u1-8 · -75.6% · 9 bets
Total (O/U)EFL Cup
+1.8u5-4 · +19.4% · 9 bets
MoneylineEPL
+7.6u5-3 · +95.6% · 8 bets
Total (O/U)WNBA
-4.1u2-6 · -51.7% · 8 bets
Total (O/U)Korea Kleague1
+2.4u5-3 · +30.4% · 8 bets
Total (O/U)Japan J League
-1.6u3-5 · -20.6% · 8 bets
DrawMLS
+8.9u4-3 · +127.9% · 7 bets
Total (O/U)Eliteserien
+3.9u5-2 · +55.0% · 7 bets
Total (O/U)Poland Ekstraklasa
-0.5u3-4 · -7.1% · 7 bets
Spread / Run lineMLB
-0.5u3-4 · -6.9% · 7 bets
Total (O/U)Belgium 1st
+2.5u4-2 · +42.5% · 6 bets
DrawItaly Serie B
+0.3u2-4 · +5.8% · 6 bets
50 more markets have fewer than 6 settled bets and are not charted yet.
By bet type · tap a row to see those bets
Bet type
Bets
Pending
Settled
Win%
Net u
ROI
Props›
6738
0
1996
56%
-98.9u
-5.0%
Game Total›
2929
14
906
42%
-110.2u
-12.2%
Game ML›
2737
2
232
51%
+9.2u
+4.0%
F3 Total›
157
0
121
55%
+3.4u
+2.8%
F5 Total›
439
0
131
53%
+5.1u
+3.9%
F3 ML›
150
0
101
51%
+5.1u
+5.0%
Spread›
983
3
63
54%
+5.3u
+8.5%
Draw›
849
0
61
33%
+9.4u
+15.4%
F5 ML›
357
0
47
38%
-2.3u
-4.8%
F1 Total›
360
0
35
49%
-3.6u
-10.3%
1Q Total›
47
8
2
50%
-0.1u
-6.5%
1Q Spread›
23
8
1
100%
+0.7u
+66.7%
1H Spread›
36
16
1
0%
-1.0u
-100.0%
1H Total›
61
7
1
100%
+0.9u
+89.3%
1H ML›
80
24
0
—
+0.0u
—
2Q Spread›
6
2
0
—
+0.0u
—
4Q Total›
4
1
0
—
+0.0u
—
2Q Total›
4
1
0
—
+0.0u
—
3Q Spread›
5
1
0
—
+0.0u
—
4Q Spread›
3
1
0
—
+0.0u
—
2H Spread›
9
2
0
—
+0.0u
—
2H Total›
8
1
0
—
+0.0u
—
3Q Total›
2
0
0
—
+0.0u
—
By sport → league → bet type
Every sport broken down to the league, then the bet type inside it — biggest first, so each league's real edge shows.
▸⚾ Baseball1548-1338-54 · -4.9% · 16 open · +0-3 unverified
Bet type
Rec
Win%
ROI
MLB1423-1219-54 · -5.1% · 1 open
Moneyline
45-35
56%
+3.2%
Spread / Run line
3-4
43%
-6.9%
Total (O/U)
93-141
40%
-20.2%
Player Props
1083-851
56%
-5.1%
F3 Total
67-54
55%
+2.8%
F5 Total
64-57
53%
+3.9%
F3 ML
36-35
51%
+5.0%
F5 ML
15-24
38%
-4.8%
F1 Total
17-18
49%
-10.3%
MiLB125-119 · -2.6%
Moneyline
52-52
50%
-8.3%
Spread / Run line
11-7
61%
+28.8%
Total (O/U)
62-60
51%
-2.3%
NPB0-0 · — · 12 open · +0-3 unverified
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
KBO0-0 · — · 3 open
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
▸⚽ Soccer232-339 · -4.5%
Bet type
Rec
Win%
ROI
Argentina25-24 · +27.3%
Moneyline
1-0
100%
+375.0%
Draw
3-1
75%
+125.0%
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
21-23
48%
+10.5%
MLS23-25 · +27.8%
Moneyline
1-2
33%
+133.3%
Draw
4-3
57%
+127.9%
Total (O/U)
18-20
47%
+1.0%
Brazil Série B8-22 · -38.2%
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
1-1
50%
+55.0%
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
7-21
25%
-44.9%
EFL Champ10-18 · -25.7%
Draw
0-2
0%
-100.0%
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
10-16
38%
-20.0%
EFL League 112-14 · +1.0%
Moneyline
0-1
0%
-100.0%
Draw
1-0
100%
+240.0%
Total (O/U)
11-13
46%
-4.7%
Italy Serie B8-17 · -23.9%
Draw
2-4
33%
+5.8%
Total (O/U)
6-13
32%
-33.3%
La Liga5-18 · -47.4%
Draw
1-1
50%
+55.0%
Total (O/U)
4-17
19%
-57.1%
Spain Segunda Division6-16 · -36.9%
Draw
1-1
50%
+55.0%
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
5-15
25%
-46.1%
Serie A10-11 · +8.6%
Draw
1-3
25%
-22.5%
Total (O/U)
9-8
53%
+15.9%
Portugal Primeira Liga13-7 · +36.8%
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-1
0%
-100.0%
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
13-6
68%
+44.0%
Eredivisie10-10 · +32.5%
Moneyline
1-0
100%
+360.0%
Draw
1-4
20%
-10.0%
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
8-6
57%
+24.3%
EPL7-13 · +15.5%
Moneyline
5-3
62%
+95.6%
Draw
1-0
100%
+425.0%
Total (O/U)
1-10
9%
-80.0%
+38 smaller leagues in this sport (239 settled bets between them)
Bet type
Rec
Win%
ROI
Superliga5-14 · -42.9%
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-1
0%
-100.0%
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
5-13
28%
-39.7%
Greece Super League5-11 · -18.2%
Draw
2-1
67%
+115.0%
Total (O/U)
3-10
23%
-49.0%
Allsvenskan9-6 · +38.9%
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
1-1
50%
+75.0%
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
8-5
62%
+33.3%
Brasileirão6-8 · -6.9%
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-2
0%
-100.0%
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
6-6
50%
+8.6%
Bundesliga10-3 · +66.9%
Total (O/U)
10-3
77%
+66.9%
Uefa Champs League3-10 · -49.6%
Moneyline
0-1
0%
-100.0%
Draw
0-2
0%
-100.0%
Total (O/U)
3-7
30%
-34.5%
Swiss SL5-8 · -16.5%
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-1
0%
-100.0%
Total (O/U)
5-7
42%
-9.6%
Ligue 17-5 · +29.2%
Total (O/U)
7-5
58%
+29.2%
EFL Cup5-7 · -10.4%
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-3
0%
-100.0%
Total (O/U)
5-4
56%
+19.4%
Scotland Prem3-8 · -38.6%
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-1
0%
-100.0%
Total (O/U)
3-7
30%
-32.5%
Chile Primera4-6 · -15.5%
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
4-6
40%
-15.5%
Superettan5-5 · +10.5%
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
5-5
50%
+10.5%
Korea Kleague15-5 · +4.3%
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-2
0%
-100.0%
Total (O/U)
5-3
62%
+30.4%
2. Bundesliga1-8 · -75.6%
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
1-8
11%
-75.6%
Japan J League3-5 · -20.6%
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
3-5
38%
-20.6%
Belgium 1st5-2 · +73.6%
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
1-0
100%
+260.0%
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
4-2
67%
+42.5%
Austria Bund.1-6 · -70.0%
Moneyline
0-1
0%
-100.0%
Draw
0-1
0%
-100.0%
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
1-4
20%
-58.0%
Eliteserien5-2 · +55.0%
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
5-2
71%
+55.0%
Poland Ekstraklasa3-4 · -7.1%
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
3-4
43%
-7.1%
DFB-Pokal1-5 · -61.7%
Draw
0-3
0%
-100.0%
Total (O/U)
1-2
33%
-23.3%
France Ligue Two1-4 · -51.0%
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-1
0%
-100.0%
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
1-3
25%
-38.8%
Ireland0-4 · -100.0%
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-4
0%
-100.0%
Veikkausliiga2-2 · +12.5%
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
2-2
50%
+12.5%
EFL League 20-2 · -100.0%
Draw
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-2
0%
-100.0%
Fa Cup0-2 · -100.0%
Draw
0-1
0%
-100.0%
Total (O/U)
0-1
0%
-100.0%
Concacaf Leagues Cup1-0 · +120.0%
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
1-0
100%
+120.0%
Italy Coppa Italia0-1 · -100.0%
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-1
0%
-100.0%
Uefa Champs League Women0-1 · -100.0%
Total (O/U)
0-1
0%
-100.0%
Liga MX0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-0
—
—
Turkey Super League0-0 · —
Draw
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
China SL0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
Germany Liga30-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
Russia Prem0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
Saudi Arabia Pro League0-0 · —
Draw
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
Sudamericana0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
Libertadores0-0 · —
Draw
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
UCL Qual0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Draw
0-0
—
—
World Cup0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
▸🎾 Tennis0-0 · — · 1 open
Bet type
Rec
Win%
ROI
WTA Tennis · Us Open0-0 · — · 1 open
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
WTA Tennis · Cincinnati Open0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
ATP Tennis · Cincinnati Open0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
WTA Tennis · Canadian Open0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
ATP Tennis · Canadian Open0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
ATP Tennis · Washington Open0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
WTA Tennis · Washington Open0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
WTA Tennis · Main tour0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
ATP Tennis · Main tour0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
ATP Tennis · Challenger0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
▸🏈 Football71-76 · -3.7% · 73 open
Bet type
Rec
Win%
ROI
NCAAF40-44 · -0.7% · 73 open
Moneyline
10-16
38%
-1.6%
Spread / Run line
19-17
53%
+1.9%
Total (O/U)
11-11
50%
-3.9%
1H ML
0-0
—
—
1Q Spread
0-0
—
—
1Q Total
0-0
—
—
1H Spread
0-0
—
—
1H Total
0-0
—
—
2Q Spread
0-0
—
—
4Q Total
0-0
—
—
2Q Total
0-0
—
—
3Q Spread
0-0
—
—
4Q Spread
0-0
—
—
2H Spread
0-0
—
—
2H Total
0-0
—
—
3Q Total
0-0
—
—
NFL21-23 · -11.0%
Spread / Run line
0-1
0%
-100.0%
Player Props
18-20
47%
-11.2%
1Q Total
1-1
50%
-6.5%
1Q Spread
1-0
100%
+66.7%
1H Spread
0-1
0%
-100.0%
1H Total
1-0
100%
+89.3%
Americanfootball Ncaaf Fcs8-8 · -5.2%
Total (O/U)
8-8
50%
-5.2%
CFL2-1 · +25.1%
Moneyline
1-1
50%
-10.0%
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
1-0
100%
+95.2%
1H Total
0-0
—
—
1Q Total
0-0
—
—
1H Spread
0-0
—
—
NFL Pre0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
▸🏀 Basketball20-17 · +1.9%
Bet type
Rec
Win%
ROI
WNBA20-17 · +1.9%
Moneyline
2-2
50%
-2.3%
Spread / Run line
1-0
100%
+95.2%
Total (O/U)
2-6
25%
-51.7%
Player Props
15-9
62%
+16.7%
1H Total
0-0
—
—
1H ML
0-0
—
—
1Q Total
0-0
—
—
1Q Spread
0-0
—
—
1H Spread
0-0
—
—
NBA SL0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
▸🥊 Combat0-0 · — · 1 open
UFC/MMA
Bet type
Rec
Win%
ROI
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
▸🏏 Cricket0-0 · —
Bet type
Rec
Win%
ROI
Cricket Caribbean Premier League0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Cricket Odi0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Cricket The Hundred Womens0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Cricket International T200-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Cricket The Hundred0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Cricket Test Match0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
▸🏉 Rugby0-0 · —
Bet type
Rec
Win%
ROI
NRL0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
Rugbyleague Nrlw0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
▸🏉 Aussie Rules0-0 · —
Bet type
Rec
Win%
ROI
Aussie Rules AFL0-0 · —
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
Aussierules Aflw0-0 · —
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
▸🥍 Lacrosse0-0 · —
Lacrosse PLL
Bet type
Rec
Win%
ROI
Moneyline
0-0
—
—
Spread / Run line
0-0
—
—
Total (O/U)
0-0
—
—
How good is Zeus? — do the Locks beat the Fades?
15777 bets reviewed. If Locks win more often and pay better than Fades, Zeus's read is worth something.
Verdict
Calls
Pending
Settled
Win%
ROI
Lock
2910
17
1203
48%
-8.5%
Lean
1859
0
653
60%
-6.0%
Fade
11008
74
1655
49%
-3.0%
Team form · who's hot & cold right now
Live team runs across every in-season league. This is opponent form, not MIDAS performance — it moved below the record for that reason, and because it loads over the network and used to leave this tab opening on a spinner.
loading team form…
Full odds board · 163 games across 50 leagues
Every game with its opening & current odds — full game lines plus sharp tennis prices. Games we have a play on are tagged. Not just our picks.
Today Full slate ⭐ Our plays
Loading odds…
🔴 LIVE game — odds have likely changed since we pulled them
—
—
Your price—
Free Daily Parlay · a free parlay at real odds
Two free entries a day — you risk nothing. Pick More or Less on 3–6 players at their real odds; the house stakes a free 10. If they all hit, you win 10 × the real combined odds. It also just tracks your parlay — every leg grades off the real result, same as the tracker. A pushed leg drops out and re-prices the rest. Diamonds you win are yours to spend on cosmetics — a free reward, never real cash and never cashed out.
Loading players…
Prediction-market prices are off
We are only publishing market data we know we are licensed to redistribute, and that question is open, so this board is switched off rather than left running while we find out.
Your positions still work. Link a public Polymarket wallet, upload a slip screenshot, or enter a position by hand — those are yours, and none of them depend on republishing anyone else's market.
Props Edge · prop +EV finder
What is this? Fixed-multiplier prop apps (PrizePicks, Underdog and the rest) pay the same multiplier on every winning leg regardless of the real price. MIDAS takes the sharp sportsbook line, strips the vig to a true probability, and flags the props whose true probability clears that multiplier's break-even — the exact math the $100+/mo tools sell, on data we already pull. You still need that app to list the same line. The edge decays fast — lines move, so race them.
MIDAS does not run a fixed-multiplier product. We ran one, it lost money once its legs were priced at the real book lines, and it was retired. This board is a scanner for the apps that still do — analysis, not a bet you can place here.
Scanning props…
🎯 Fair value = the sharp book with the vig removed. A flag means the true probability beats that app's break-even if your app lists that line — it is analysis for information only, not a bet you can place here and not a guarantee. Those apps limit winners and change lines fast.
Settings · make MIDAS yours
Prediction-market accounts · read-only, encrypted on your device
Loading…
Region preview from your language
How your numbers will read
Date—
Kickoff—
Number—
Odds—
Owner
History vault · owner tools
Pricing · what happens after the beta
MIDAS is free for everyone during the open beta. No card, no trial timer, nothing to cancel.
When the beta ends the list price is $29/mo (or $249/yr). The founder offer above is time-boxed and ends 2026-10-31 — after it, everyone pays list. We will tell you at least 30 days before anything changes, and anyone who joins during the beta keeps $29/mo even if the list price rises later.
Tracking your bets, automatic grading, every bot's full public record, tailing picks and the social side stay free permanently. Paying only ever unlocks depth — unlimited slip scanning, the full market-history research corpus and advanced record splits.
Your public page · the link for your bio
Loading…
Subscription · manage or cancel
Change your plan, update your card, download invoices, or cancel. Cancelling keeps Pro
until the end of the period you have already paid for.
Alerts · what you get told about
MIDAS can tell you when a bot you follow posts, when one of your bets is graded, and when a game you have money on is about to start. Everything here is off-able, including all of it at once.
Loading…
Invite a friend · your link, your credit
Loading…
Problem reports · sent from inside the app
Email mailroom · optional, needs a mailbox connected
Bet type · sportsbook or prediction market
Track traditional sportsbook slips, or prediction-market positions priced in cents (Polymarket, Kalshi, Novig). This sets your default odds view — no mainstream tracker does prediction markets, so this is yours.
🏛 Sportsbook📈 Prediction market
Odds format · it's all the same math
AmericanDecimalFractionalImplied %Prediction ¢
Your book
Which book's prices MIDAS shows you by default. You can also change this right on the Odds page.
Appearance
🌙 Dark☀️ Light beta
Language
Your Progress · level up by playing · earn badges, borders & diamonds
Loading progress…
Leaderboard
Ranked on verified bets only — our server confirms each was locked pre-game or live (from a timestamp you can't edit), so backdated or found slips don't count. Flat-unit scoring so a $5 and a $500 bettor compare fairly.
Everyone starts with the same 10,000 practice coins — your balance is your rank. Play games in the Practice Book and the Free Daily Parlay to climb. No real money, ever.
Loading…
📣 Feed · what the people you follow are betting — and cashing
Loading the feed…
🐾 The Zoo · strategy bots, competing in the open
🏟️ Sportsbook🔮 Prediction Markets
🏆 How to read a bot:Units = did it actually make money — this is the one that had to be earned. Record = how often it wins. Line Value = was the price better than a sharp reference book at the moment the pick posted. Read this one carefully: MIDAS only posts a pick on the side that already prices better than the reference, so nearly every bot shows positive Line Value. It is price discipline, not evidence of an edge, and it does not predict results. ✓ Up, good prices = making money and taking good numbers · 🍀 Running hot = winning while taking worse numbers than the reference · 📈 Losing, prices fine = the common case, and not on its own a reason to expect a turnaround. What's Line Value??
Every one of these is an strategy bot — not a person. Each follows one plain-language method and bets it transparently, wins and losses in full view. Adopt one to follow how tailing it would go. A glass box, not a tip service.
Loading the Zoo…
People · find real bettors to follow
Real MIDAS users who've made their profile public. Follow them to build your feed and track who's hot. Want to show up here? Flip on “Show my profile publicly” in Your Locker.
Loading people…
Practice NO REAL MONEY
Practice arena
Bankroll—
Record0-0no settled bets yet
Streak—
Diamonds—
Real games at real prices, staked in coins and graded from the real result. Everything here is virtual and has no cash value — practice results do not predict real ones.
Place a practice bet
Or tap ＋ on any pick in Today and choose wager coins.
Open practice bets
Compete for the pot
Settled practice bets
Your locker
🎨 Avatar, borders & badges
Everything you have unlocked
Open
Get diamonds
For cosmetics, entries and treats
Get
🏆 Practice standings
How you rank against everyone playing
See
Your collection
Loading…
Learn · betting, explained like a friend would
New to betting? You're in exactly the right place. No jargon, no math, no feeling dumb — everyone starts here. Read a term, then go practice it for free in the Practice Book.
🔬 Research Center
The homework behind every pick. Search our growing database of real games, players and props — so you can see what actually happened before you bet, not just the odds. Pick a lens to start:
Loading the data lake…
🔎 Players — type any player's name to pull their full game log and season splits, plus hit rates on their common props (how often they go over/under a line). Great for prop research.
🛡️ Teams — type any team to see their record, ATS (against the spread), over/under lean, and how the market moved on them by close (CLV). Use it to gauge form and value.
🔥 Streaks — every team on an active run right now, grouped by league: win/cold streaks, ATS cover & fade runs, over/under streaks, and NRFI. Tap any team to open its full game log.
📊 Prop hit-rates — across the whole database, which prop markets cash most often. Find the market types that historically land — then dig into specific players on the Players tab.
In play · what's on right now, and what already settled today
Sportsbook prices freeze once a game starts, so live rows are priced from prediction markets where we have them — and say so plainly where we don't.
Loading…
Review queue · held posts & reports
Held content is invisible to readers until it's decided here. A flag means a human should look — it is not an accusation, and publishing is the expected outcome for most of them.
Loading…
Positions · your prediction-market book
Kept separate from the sportsbook tracker on purpose: a position moves while you hold it and is priced in cents and shares, so mixing the two would produce a units figure that means nothing.
Loading…
Prediction-market prices are off
We are only publishing market data we know we are licensed to redistribute, and that question is open, so this board is switched off rather than left running while we find out.
Your positions still work. Link a public Polymarket wallet, upload a slip screenshot, or enter a position by hand — those are yours, and none of them depend on republishing anyone else's market.
History · settled positions, by day
Loading…
Prediction-market prices are off
We are only publishing market data we know we are licensed to redistribute, and that question is open, so this board is switched off rather than left running while we find out.
Your positions still work. Link a public Polymarket wallet, upload a slip screenshot, or enter a position by hand — those are yours, and none of them depend on republishing anyone else's market.
Position Journal · what moved, what resolved, what it cost
A prediction-market position moves every day you hold it — unlike a sports bet, which is struck once and settles. This tracks the marks, not just the outcomes.
Loading your journal…
📓 MIDAS Journal · what it's learning
After each day, MIDAS reviews the results and refines what it bets — so it learns from real results, not lucky streaks. It's still compiling and will start steering picks once the sample proves out. Zeus's track record is here too.
🧠 Learnings Memory · durable insights they keep, so they don't forget
🧠 MIDAS — what it's learned (20)
Backing New York Mets has paid so far — 6-1, +0.11u/bet. ×28
Backing Washington Nationals has paid so far — 6-1, +0.10u/bet. ×28
Argentina / Game ML has held a real edge — 1-0, +0.09u/bet (shrunk) over 66 bets. line value +1.4pp at pick time×26
MiLB / Spread has held a real edge — 4-2, +0.08u/bet (shrunk) over 189 bets. line value +1.7pp at pick time×26
MiLB / Game ML keeps bleeding — 1-5, -0.08u/bet over 205 bets; lean away from it. ×26
Argentina / Game Total has held a real edge — 5-2, +0.10u/bet (shrunk) over 81 bets. line value +4.2pp at pick time×25
Argentina / Draw has held a real edge — 2-0, +0.09u/bet (shrunk) over 43 bets. line value -0.1pp at pick time×23
MLS / Draw has held a real edge — 4-1, +0.24u/bet (shrunk) over 53 bets. line value +1.6pp at pick time×22
MLS / Game ML has held a real edge — 1-1, +0.12u/bet (shrunk) over 47 bets. line value +2.3pp at pick time×22
WNBA / Game Total keeps bleeding — 2-6, -0.09u/bet over 59 bets; lean away from it. ×19
NPB / Game Total keeps bleeding — 1-4, -0.07u/bet over 116 bets; lean away from it. ×17
Brazil Série B / Game Total keeps bleeding — 2-5, -0.05u/bet over 44 bets; lean away from it. ×16
Backing St. Louis Cardinals has paid so far — 6-4, +0.06u/bet. ×14
Jake Burger props have been profitable — 5-0, +0.11u/bet. ×14
Gunnar Henderson props have been profitable — 5-0, +0.10u/bet. ×14
MLB / Game Total keeps bleeding — 72-98, -0.12u/bet over 457 bets; lean away from it. ×13
Steven Kwan props have been profitable — 6-0, +0.10u/bet. ×13
Sal Stewart props have been profitable — 4-0, +0.06u/bet. ×11
MLB / Props keeps bleeding — 83-72, -0.07u/bet over 4335 bets; lean away from it. ×10
Chase Meidroth props have been profitable — 4-0, +0.08u/bet. ×10
EARLY LEAN (edge showing, sample still small — watching, NOT steering yet): MLS / Draw (4-3, +0.19u/bet shrunk), Argentina / Draw (3-1, +0.11u/bet shrunk), MiLB / Spread (11-6, +0.11u/bet shrunk), MLS / Game ML (1-2, +0.09u/bet shrunk)
EARLY CAUTION (bleeding so far — watching): Brasileirão / Draw (0-2, -0.05u/bet shrunk), EFL Champ / Game Total (10-14, -0.05u/bet shrunk), MLB / Props (932-759, -0.07u/bet shrunk), NPB / Game Total (0-3, -0.07u/bet shrunk)
Too-early signals (tracking only): Bundesliga / Game Total (13 bets), EPL / Game ML (9 bets), Portugal Primeira Liga / Game Total (23 bets), EPL / Draw (1 bets), Eredivisie / Game ML (10 bets)
Line value is +2.51pp — at the moment we post them, our prices are better than the sharp reference, even where results lag. That is a process signal, not a closing-line measurement.
Fable check (real sample): its BETs (551-594, -0.076u/bet) are NOT beating its FADEs (708-730, -0.023u/bet).
Best cells
MLS / Draw
4-3
+8.95u
+1.6pp
Bundesliga / Game Total
10-3
+8.70u
+5.5pp
EPL / Game ML
5-3
+7.64u
+2.2pp
Argentina / Draw
3-1
+5.00u
-0.1pp
Portugal Primeira Liga / Game Total
11-6
+6.21u
+6.1pp
Favorite teams
New York Mets +8.7uSt. Louis Cardinals +7.5uGimnasia Mendoza +5.2uLas Vegas Aviators +6.4uToronto FC +5.0uCharlotte Knights +5.2u
EARLY LEAN (edge showing, sample still small — watching, NOT steering yet): MLS / Draw (4-2, +0.22u/bet shrunk), MiLB / Spread (11-6, +0.11u/bet shrunk), Argentina / Draw (2-0, +0.09u/bet shrunk), MLS / Game ML (1-2, +0.09u/bet shrunk)
EARLY CAUTION (bleeding so far — watching): EFL Champ / Game Total (10-14, -0.05u/bet shrunk), MLS / Game Total (11-16, -0.06u/bet shrunk), MLB / Props (852-694, -0.07u/bet shrunk), MLB / F1 Total (12-15, -0.07u/bet shrunk)
Too-early signals (tracking only): Bundesliga / Game Total (13 bets), EPL / Game ML (9 bets), EPL / Draw (1 bets), Eredivisie / Game ML (10 bets), Portugal Primeira Liga / Game Total (21 bets)
Line value is +2.48pp — at the moment we post them, our prices are better than the sharp reference, even where results lag. That is a process signal, not a closing-line measurement.
Fable check (real sample): its BETs (497-540, -0.080u/bet) are NOT beating its FADEs (612-628, -0.015u/bet).
Best cells
MLS / Draw
4-2
+9.95u
+1.6pp
Bundesliga / Game Total
10-3
+8.70u
+5.5pp
EPL / Game ML
5-3
+7.64u
+2.2pp
MiLB / Spread
11-6
+6.18u
+1.7pp
EPL / Draw
1-0
+4.25u
+1.0pp
Favorite teams
New York Mets +8.7uGimnasia Mendoza +5.2uSt. Louis Cardinals +6.4uToronto FC +5.0uCharlotte Knights +5.2uWashington Nationals +5.7u
Favorite players / props
Gunnar Henderson +5.4uSal Stewart +5.6uChandler Simpson +3.8uJake Burger +3.8uSteven Kwan +3.9uChase Meidroth +3.5u
EARLY LEAN (edge showing, sample still small — watching, NOT steering yet): MLS / Draw (4-2, +0.22u/bet shrunk), Argentina / Game Total (16-14, +0.11u/bet shrunk), MiLB / Spread (11-6, +0.11u/bet shrunk), Argentina / Draw (2-0, +0.09u/bet shrunk)
EARLY CAUTION (bleeding so far — watching): MLB / F1 Total (12-13, -0.04u/bet shrunk), Superettan / Game Total (1-3, -0.04u/bet shrunk), NPB / Game Total (0-3, -0.07u/bet shrunk), MLS / Game Total (7-12, -0.07u/bet shrunk)
Too-early signals (tracking only): EPL / Game ML (9 bets), Allsvenskan / Game Total (28 bets), Bundesliga / Game Total (8 bets), Eredivisie / Game ML (10 bets), Eredivisie / Game Total (18 bets)
Line value is +2.42pp — at the moment we post them, our prices are better than the sharp reference, even where results lag. That is a process signal, not a closing-line measurement.
Fable check (real sample): its BETs (442-449, -0.048u/bet) are NOT beating its FADEs (512-498, +0.023u/bet).
Best cells
MLS / Draw
4-2
+9.95u
+1.6pp
EPL / Game ML
5-3
+7.64u
+2.2pp
Argentina / Game Total
16-14
+7.61u
+3.9pp
MiLB / Spread
11-6
+6.18u
+1.7pp
Allsvenskan / Game Total
6-2
+4.93u
+3.8pp
Favorite teams
St. Louis Cardinals +6.5uGimnasia Mendoza +5.2uToronto FC +5.0uNew York Mets +5.7uWashington Nationals +5.7uJacksonville Jumbo Shrimp +4.5u
Favorite players / props
Gunnar Henderson +5.4uSal Stewart +4.7uTravis Bazzana +4.3uMatt Olson +4.1uJuan Soto +4.1uMax Muncy +3.7u
EARLY LEAN (edge showing, sample still small — watching, NOT steering yet): MLS / Draw (4-2, +0.22u/bet shrunk), MiLB / Spread (10-5, +0.11u/bet shrunk), Argentina / Game Total (16-14, +0.11u/bet shrunk), Argentina / Draw (2-0, +0.09u/bet shrunk)
EARLY CAUTION (bleeding so far — watching): MLB / F1 Total (12-13, -0.04u/bet shrunk), NPB / Game Total (0-3, -0.07u/bet shrunk), MLS / Game Total (7-12, -0.07u/bet shrunk), WNBA / Game Total (2-6, -0.09u/bet shrunk)
Too-early signals (tracking only): EPL / Game ML (9 bets), Allsvenskan / Game Total (28 bets), Bundesliga / Game Total (8 bets), Eredivisie / Game ML (10 bets), Eredivisie / Game Total (18 bets)
Line value is +2.38pp — at the moment we post them, our prices are better than the sharp reference, even where results lag. That is a process signal, not a closing-line measurement.
Fable check (real sample): its BETs (393-413, -0.045u/bet) are NOT beating its FADEs (465-435, +0.035u/bet).
Best cells
MLS / Draw
4-2
+9.95u
+1.6pp
EPL / Game ML
5-3
+7.64u
+2.2pp
MiLB / Spread
10-5
+6.27u
+1.7pp
Argentina / Game Total
16-14
+7.61u
+3.9pp
Allsvenskan / Game Total
6-2
+4.93u
+3.8pp
Favorite teams
St. Louis Cardinals +6.5uGimnasia Mendoza +5.2uToronto FC +5.0uNew York Mets +5.7uJacksonville Jumbo Shrimp +4.5uWashington Nationals +4.4u
EARLY LEAN (edge showing, sample still small — watching, NOT steering yet): MLS / Draw (4-2, +0.22u/bet shrunk), MiLB / Spread (10-5, +0.11u/bet shrunk), Argentina / Game Total (15-13, +0.11u/bet shrunk), Argentina / Draw (2-0, +0.09u/bet shrunk)
EARLY CAUTION (bleeding so far — watching): MLB / F1 Total (12-13, -0.04u/bet shrunk), NPB / Game Total (0-3, -0.07u/bet shrunk), MLS / Game Total (7-12, -0.07u/bet shrunk), WNBA / Game Total (2-6, -0.09u/bet shrunk)
Too-early signals (tracking only): EPL / Game ML (9 bets), Allsvenskan / Game Total (28 bets), Bundesliga / Game Total (8 bets), Eredivisie / Game ML (10 bets), NCAAF / Spread (26 bets)
Line value is +2.36pp — at the moment we post them, our prices are better than the sharp reference, even where results lag. That is a process signal, not a closing-line measurement.
Fable check (real sample): its BETs (362-400, -0.064u/bet) are NOT beating its FADEs (438-404, +0.041u/bet).
Best cells
MLS / Draw
4-2
+9.95u
+1.6pp
EPL / Game ML
5-3
+7.64u
+2.2pp
MiLB / Spread
10-5
+6.27u
+1.7pp
Argentina / Game Total
15-13
+7.41u
+3.8pp
Allsvenskan / Game Total
6-2
+4.93u
+3.8pp
Favorite teams
St. Louis Cardinals +6.5uGimnasia Mendoza +5.2uToronto FC +5.0uNew York Mets +5.7uJacksonville Jumbo Shrimp +3.6uWashington Nationals +4.4u
EARLY LEAN (edge showing, sample still small — watching, NOT steering yet): MLS / Draw (4-2, +0.22u/bet shrunk), MiLB / Spread (8-4, +0.10u/bet shrunk), Argentina / Draw (2-0, +0.09u/bet shrunk), MLS / Game ML (1-2, +0.09u/bet shrunk)
EARLY CAUTION (bleeding so far — watching): MLB / F1 Total (11-13, -0.06u/bet shrunk), NPB / Game Total (0-3, -0.07u/bet shrunk), MLS / Game Total (7-12, -0.07u/bet shrunk), WNBA / Game Total (2-6, -0.09u/bet shrunk)
Too-early signals (tracking only): EPL / Game ML (9 bets), Allsvenskan / Game Total (27 bets), Bundesliga / Game Total (8 bets), Eredivisie / Game ML (10 bets), Eredivisie / Game Total (16 bets)
Line value is +2.36pp — at the moment we post them, our prices are better than the sharp reference, even where results lag. That is a process signal, not a closing-line measurement.
Fable check (real sample): its BETs (348-379, -0.059u/bet) are NOT beating its FADEs (401-371, +0.045u/bet).
Best cells
MLS / Draw
4-2
+9.95u
+1.6pp
EPL / Game ML
5-3
+7.64u
+2.2pp
Allsvenskan / Game Total
6-1
+5.93u
+3.5pp
MiLB / Spread
8-4
+5.40u
+1.8pp
Bundesliga / Game Total
6-2
+4.85u
+5.2pp
Favorite teams
Gimnasia Mendoza +5.2uToronto FC +5.0uSt. Louis Cardinals +5.7uWashington Nationals +5.4uNew York Mets +4.8uAthletics +4.0u
EARLY LEAN (edge showing, sample still small — watching, NOT steering yet): MLS / Draw (4-2, +0.22u/bet shrunk), MiLB / Spread (7-3, +0.11u/bet shrunk), Argentina / Draw (2-0, +0.09u/bet shrunk), MLS / Game ML (1-2, +0.09u/bet shrunk)
EARLY CAUTION (bleeding so far — watching): NPB / Game Total (0-3, -0.07u/bet shrunk), WNBA / Game Total (2-6, -0.09u/bet shrunk), Brazil Série B / Game Total (3-10, -0.12u/bet shrunk), MLB / Game Total (73-103, -0.14u/bet shrunk)
Too-early signals (tracking only): EPL / Game ML (9 bets), Allsvenskan / Game Total (27 bets), Bundesliga / Game Total (6 bets), Eredivisie / Game ML (10 bets), EFL League 1 / Draw (13 bets)
Line value is +2.30pp — at the moment we post them, our prices are better than the sharp reference, even where results lag. That is a process signal, not a closing-line measurement.
Fable check (real sample): its BETs (303-325, -0.058u/bet) are NOT beating its FADEs (357-320, +0.065u/bet).
Best cells
MLS / Draw
4-2
+9.95u
+1.6pp
EPL / Game ML
5-3
+7.64u
+2.2pp
Allsvenskan / Game Total
6-1
+5.93u
+3.5pp
MiLB / Spread
7-3
+5.40u
+1.8pp
Bundesliga / Game Total
5-1
+4.70u
+5.6pp
Favorite teams
Gimnasia Mendoza +5.2uSt. Louis Cardinals +5.7uWashington Nationals +5.4uNew York Mets +4.8uNorfolk Tides +3.9uSan Francisco Giants +3.0u
EARLY LEAN (edge showing, sample still small — watching, NOT steering yet): MLS / Draw (4-2, +0.22u/bet shrunk), Argentina / Draw (2-0, +0.09u/bet shrunk), MLS / Game ML (1-2, +0.09u/bet shrunk), Argentina / Game Total (9-7, +0.09u/bet shrunk)
EARLY CAUTION (bleeding so far — watching): MLS / Game Total (3-6, -0.05u/bet shrunk), NPB / Game Total (0-3, -0.07u/bet shrunk), WNBA / Game Total (2-6, -0.09u/bet shrunk), Brazil Série B / Game Total (2-7, -0.09u/bet shrunk)
Too-early signals (tracking only): EPL / Game ML (9 bets), Eredivisie / Game ML (10 bets), Allsvenskan / Game Total (25 bets), NCAAF / Game Total (7 bets), La Liga / Draw (7 bets)
Line value is +2.25pp — at the moment we post them, our prices are better than the sharp reference, even where results lag. That is a process signal, not a closing-line measurement.
Fable check (real sample): its BETs (246-274, -0.067u/bet) are NOT beating its FADEs (302-261, +0.080u/bet).
Best cells
MLS / Draw
4-2
+9.95u
+1.6pp
EPL / Game ML
5-3
+7.64u
+2.2pp
Argentina / Draw
2-0
+3.90u
-0.1pp
MLS / Game ML
1-2
+4.00u
+2.3pp
Argentina / Game Total
9-7
+5.13u
+3.1pp
Favorite teams
Washington Nationals +7.4uSt. Louis Cardinals +5.7uNew York Mets +5.2uNew York Yankees +3.3uNorfolk Tides +2.9uSan Francisco Giants +3.0u
EARLY LEAN (edge showing, sample still small — watching, NOT steering yet): MLS / Draw (4-2, +0.22u/bet shrunk), MiLB / Spread (6-2, +0.11u/bet shrunk), Argentina / Game Total (9-6, +0.11u/bet shrunk), Argentina / Draw (2-0, +0.09u/bet shrunk)
EARLY CAUTION (bleeding so far — watching): MLS / Game Total (3-6, -0.05u/bet shrunk), MiLB / Game Total (9-12, -0.06u/bet shrunk), NPB / Game Total (0-3, -0.07u/bet shrunk), Brazil Série B / Game Total (2-6, -0.07u/bet shrunk)
Too-early signals (tracking only): EPL / Game ML (9 bets), Eredivisie / Game ML (10 bets), Allsvenskan / Game Total (25 bets), Ligue 1 / Game Total (2 bets), La Liga / Draw (7 bets)
Line value is +2.23pp — at the moment we post them, our prices are better than the sharp reference, even where results lag. That is a process signal, not a closing-line measurement.
Fable check (real sample): its BETs (221-241, -0.033u/bet) are NOT beating its FADEs (261-227, +0.069u/bet).
Best cells
MLS / Draw
4-2
+9.95u
+1.6pp
EPL / Game ML
5-3
+7.64u
+2.2pp
MiLB / Spread
6-2
+5.45u
+1.8pp
Argentina / Game Total
9-6
+6.13u
+3.1pp
Argentina / Draw
2-0
+3.90u
-0.1pp
Favorite teams
Washington Nationals +7.4uNew York Mets +5.2uNew York Yankees +3.3uNorfolk Tides +2.9uSt. Louis Cardinals +3.2uSan Francisco Giants +3.0u
EARLY LEAN (edge showing, sample still small — watching, NOT steering yet): MLS / Draw (4-2, +0.22u/bet shrunk), Argentina / Game Total (9-6, +0.11u/bet shrunk), MLB / Game ML (24-13, +0.10u/bet shrunk), MiLB / Spread (5-2, +0.10u/bet shrunk)
EARLY CAUTION (bleeding so far — watching): MiLB / Game Total (5-7, -0.04u/bet shrunk), MLS / Game Total (3-6, -0.05u/bet shrunk), NPB / Game Total (0-3, -0.07u/bet shrunk), Brazil Série B / Game Total (2-6, -0.07u/bet shrunk)
Too-early signals (tracking only): EPL / Game ML (9 bets), Eredivisie / Game ML (10 bets), Ligue 1 / Game Total (2 bets), La Liga / Draw (7 bets), Allsvenskan / Game Total (24 bets)
Line value is +2.23pp — at the moment we post them, our prices are better than the sharp reference, even where results lag. That is a process signal, not a closing-line measurement.
Fable check (real sample): its BETs (170-173, +0.003u/bet) are NOT beating its FADEs (231-197, +0.085u/bet).
Best cells
MLS / Draw
4-2
+9.95u
+1.6pp
EPL / Game ML
5-3
+7.64u
+2.2pp
Argentina / Game Total
9-6
+6.13u
+3.1pp
MLB / Game ML
24-13
+7.60u
+0.3pp
MiLB / Spread
5-2
+4.45u
+1.8pp
Favorite teams
Washington Nationals +7.9uNew York Mets +5.2uSan Francisco Giants +4.0uNew York Yankees +3.3uSt. Louis Cardinals +3.2uMilwaukee Brewers +2.5u
EARLY LEAN (edge showing, sample still small — watching, NOT steering yet): MLS / Draw (4-2, +0.22u/bet shrunk), MLB / Game ML (22-7, +0.18u/bet shrunk), MLB / Props (165-89, +0.11u/bet shrunk), Argentina / Game Total (9-6, +0.11u/bet shrunk)
EARLY CAUTION (bleeding so far — watching): MLS / Game Total (3-6, -0.05u/bet shrunk), Brazil Série B / Game Total (2-5, -0.05u/bet shrunk), MLB / F1 Total (5-7, -0.06u/bet shrunk), NPB / Game Total (0-3, -0.07u/bet shrunk)
Too-early signals (tracking only): EPL / Game ML (9 bets), Eredivisie / Game ML (10 bets), Ligue 1 / Game Total (2 bets), La Liga / Draw (7 bets), Allsvenskan / Game Total (24 bets)
Line value is +2.20pp — at the moment we post them, our prices are better than the sharp reference, even where results lag. That is a process signal, not a closing-line measurement.
Fable check (real sample): its BETs (128-144, -0.006u/bet) are NOT beating its FADEs (206-156, +0.147u/bet).
Best cells
MLS / Draw
4-2
+9.95u
+1.6pp
MLB / Game ML
22-7
+12.24u
+0.3pp
EPL / Game ML
5-3
+7.64u
+2.2pp
MLB / Props
165-89
+33.51u
+3.8pp
Argentina / Game Total
9-6
+6.13u
+3.1pp
Favorite teams
Washington Nationals +6.6uNew York Mets +5.2uSan Francisco Giants +4.0uNew York Yankees +3.3uBaltimore Orioles +3.3uMilwaukee Brewers +2.5u
EARLY LEAN (edge showing, sample still small — watching, NOT steering yet): MLS / Draw (4-2, +0.22u/bet shrunk), MiLB / Game Total (23-13, +0.11u/bet shrunk), Argentina / Game Total (9-6, +0.11u/bet shrunk), MLB / F3 Total (46-27, +0.11u/bet shrunk)
EARLY CAUTION (bleeding so far — watching): NPB / Game Total (5-7, -0.04u/bet shrunk), MLS / Game Total (3-6, -0.05u/bet shrunk), MLB / Spread (3-6, -0.06u/bet shrunk), MLB / Props (301-243, -0.06u/bet shrunk)
Too-early signals (tracking only): EPL / Game ML (9 bets), Eredivisie / Game ML (10 bets), Ligue 1 / Game Total (2 bets), Allsvenskan / Game Total (24 bets), Allsvenskan / Draw (27 bets)
Line value is +2.24pp — at the moment we post them, our prices are better than the sharp reference, even where results lag. That is a process signal, not a closing-line measurement.
Fable check (real sample): its BETs (215-226, -0.002u/bet) are NOT beating its FADEs (371-297, +0.067u/bet).
Best cells
MLS / Draw
4-2
+9.95u
+1.6pp
EPL / Game ML
5-4
+6.64u
+2.2pp
MiLB / Game Total
23-13
+8.46u
+0.5pp
Argentina / Game Total
9-6
+6.13u
+3.1pp
MLB / F3 Total
46-27
+12.12u
+2.3pp
Favorite teams
Washington Nationals +11.8uSan Francisco Giants +9.1uIowa Cubs +4.1uBaltimore Orioles +4.1uNew York Mets +4.2uMilwaukee Brewers +3.8u
Favorite players / props
Matt McLain +4.0uVinnie Pasquantino +3.9uZach McKinstry +3.7uNatasha Cloud +3.6uRonald Acuna Jr. +3.2uDaz Cameron +2.7u
EARLY LEAN (edge showing, sample still small — watching, NOT steering yet): MLS / Draw (4-2, +0.22u/bet shrunk), MLB / Props (348-173, +0.13u/bet shrunk), Argentina / Game Total (9-6, +0.11u/bet shrunk), MLB / F3 Total (44-26, +0.11u/bet shrunk)
EARLY CAUTION (bleeding so far — watching): NPB / Game Total (3-5, -0.04u/bet shrunk), WNBA / Game Total (4-6, -0.05u/bet shrunk), MLS / Game Total (3-6, -0.05u/bet shrunk), MLB / F1 Total (6-11, -0.10u/bet shrunk)
Too-early signals (tracking only): EPL / Game ML (9 bets), Eredivisie / Game ML (10 bets), Ligue 1 / Game Total (2 bets), Allsvenskan / Game Total (24 bets), Allsvenskan / Draw (27 bets)
Line value is +2.24pp — at the moment we post them, our prices are better than the sharp reference, even where results lag. That is a process signal, not a closing-line measurement.
Fable check (real sample): its BETs (231-188, +0.125u/bet) are beating its FADEs (340-252, +0.108u/bet).
Best cells
MLS / Draw
4-2
+9.95u
+1.6pp
EPL / Game ML
5-4
+6.64u
+2.2pp
MLB / Props
348-173
+74.52u
+3.9pp
Argentina / Game Total
9-6
+6.13u
+3.1pp
MLB / F3 Total
44-26
+11.70u
+2.4pp
Favorite teams
Washington Nationals +11.8uSan Francisco Giants +7.4uNew York Mets +6.2uBaltimore Orioles +4.1uMilwaukee Brewers +3.8uTacoma Rainiers +3.2u
EARLY LEAN (edge showing, sample still small — watching, NOT steering yet): MLS / Draw (4-2, +0.22u/bet shrunk), Argentina / Game Total (9-6, +0.11u/bet shrunk), MLB / Game ML (25-14, +0.10u/bet shrunk), Argentina / Draw (2-0, +0.09u/bet shrunk)
EARLY CAUTION (bleeding so far — watching): MLS / Game Total (3-6, -0.05u/bet shrunk), MLB / Props (216-172, -0.07u/bet shrunk), NPB / Game Total (1-4, -0.07u/bet shrunk), MiLB / Game ML (6-9, -0.07u/bet shrunk)
Too-early signals (tracking only): EPL / Game ML (9 bets), Eredivisie / Game ML (10 bets), Ligue 1 / Game Total (2 bets), La Liga / Draw (7 bets), Allsvenskan / Game Total (24 bets)
Line value is +2.22pp — at the moment we post them, our prices are better than the sharp reference, even where results lag. That is a process signal, not a closing-line measurement.
Fable check (real sample): its BETs (165-181, -0.013u/bet) are NOT beating its FADEs (281-225, +0.080u/bet).
Best cells
MLS / Draw
4-2
+9.95u
+1.6pp
EPL / Game ML
5-4
+6.64u
+2.2pp
Argentina / Game Total
9-6
+6.13u
+3.1pp
MLB / Game ML
25-14
+7.83u
+0.3pp
Argentina / Draw
2-0
+3.90u
-0.1pp
Favorite teams
San Francisco Giants +7.5uNew York Mets +6.2uWashington Nationals +6.5uSeattle Mariners +4.0uTampa Bay Rays +3.5uIowa Cubs +3.1u
EARLY LEAN (edge showing, sample still small — watching, NOT steering yet): MLS / Draw (4-2, +0.22u/bet shrunk), MLB / Game ML (22-7, +0.18u/bet shrunk), Argentina / Draw (2-0, +0.09u/bet shrunk), MLS / Game ML (1-2, +0.09u/bet shrunk)
EARLY CAUTION (bleeding so far — watching): WNBA / Game Total (2-4, -0.05u/bet shrunk), MLS / Game Total (3-6, -0.05u/bet shrunk), MiLB / Game Total (0-3, -0.07u/bet shrunk), MLB / NRFI (5-8, -0.07u/bet shrunk)
Too-early signals (tracking only): Ligue 1 / Game Total (2 bets), Brazil Série B / Draw (28 bets), La Liga / Draw (7 bets), Allsvenskan / Game Total (20 bets), Greece Super League / Game Total (1 bets)
Line value is +2.26pp — at the moment we post them, our prices are better than the sharp reference, even where results lag. That is a process signal, not a closing-line measurement.
Fable check (real sample): its BETs (139-131, +0.040u/bet) are NOT beating its FADEs (189-154, +0.101u/bet).
Best cells
MLS / Draw
4-2
+9.95u
+2.4pp
MLB / Game ML
22-7
+12.33u
+0.3pp
Argentina / Draw
2-0
+3.90u
-0.0pp
MLS / Game ML
1-2
+4.00u
+2.5pp
Argentina / Game Total
6-4
+4.25u
+3.0pp
Favorite teams
Washington Nationals +6.6uSan Francisco Giants +6.6uNew York Mets +5.2uSeattle Mariners +3.1uNew York Yankees +3.3uBaltimore Orioles +3.3u
Favorite players / props
Matt McLain +3.6uEduardo Valencia +3.4uFrancisco Lindor +3.0uJavier Sanoja +2.6uGunnar Henderson +2.2uIsaac Paredes +2.0u
EARLY LEAN (edge showing, sample still small — watching, NOT steering yet): MLS / Draw (4-2, +0.22u/bet shrunk), MLB / Game ML (14-6, +0.10u/bet shrunk), Argentina / Game Total (7-4, +0.10u/bet shrunk), MLS / Game ML (1-2, +0.09u/bet shrunk)
EARLY CAUTION (bleeding so far — watching): MLS / Game Total (3-6, -0.05u/bet shrunk), MLB / NRFI (5-7, -0.06u/bet shrunk), MiLB / Game Total (0-3, -0.07u/bet shrunk), MiLB / Game ML (1-6, -0.10u/bet shrunk)
Too-early signals (tracking only): EPL / Game ML (8 bets), Eredivisie / Game ML (10 bets), Allsvenskan / Draw (23 bets), Ligue 1 / Game Total (2 bets), Brazil Série B / Draw (28 bets)
Line value is +2.22pp — at the moment we post them, our prices are better than the sharp reference, even where results lag. That is a process signal, not a closing-line measurement.
Fable check (real sample): its BETs (105-111, +0.059u/bet) are NOT beating its FADEs (161-131, +0.107u/bet).
Best cells
MLS / Draw
4-2
+9.95u
+2.4pp
EPL / Game ML
5-3
+7.64u
+1.3pp
MLB / Game ML
14-6
+6.30u
+0.3pp
Argentina / Game Total
7-4
+5.30u
+3.1pp
MLS / Game ML
1-2
+4.00u
+2.5pp
Favorite teams
New York Mets +5.2uWashington Nationals +4.0uNew York Yankees +3.3uBaltimore Orioles +3.3uMilwaukee Brewers +2.5uSan Francisco Giants +2.6u
Favorite players / props
Gunnar Henderson +2.2uBrady House +2.2uJake Burger +2.1uMatt McLain +2.2uBrett Baty +2.1uWilyer Abreu +2.0u
EARLY LEAN (edge showing, sample still small — watching, NOT steering yet): MLS / Draw (4-1, +0.24u/bet shrunk), MLS / Game ML (1-2, +0.09u/bet shrunk), Argentina / Game ML (1-0, +0.09u/bet shrunk), MLB / Game ML (13-6, +0.09u/bet shrunk)
EARLY CAUTION (bleeding so far — watching): NPB / Game Total (0-2, -0.05u/bet shrunk), MLB / NRFI (5-7, -0.06u/bet shrunk), MiLB / Game Total (0-3, -0.07u/bet shrunk), MiLB / Game ML (1-5, -0.08u/bet shrunk)
Too-early signals (tracking only): EPL / Game ML (8 bets), Eredivisie / Game ML (10 bets), Allsvenskan / Game Total (19 bets), Ligue 1 / Game Total (2 bets), Brazil Série B / Draw (28 bets)
Line value is +2.20pp — at the moment we post them, our prices are better than the sharp reference, even where results lag. That is a process signal, not a closing-line measurement.
Fable check (real sample): its BETs (102-102, +0.101u/bet) are beating its FADEs (155-132, +0.078u/bet).
Best cells
MLS / Draw
4-1
+10.95u
+2.1pp
EPL / Game ML
5-3
+7.64u
+2.4pp
MLS / Game ML
1-2
+4.00u
+2.5pp
Argentina / Game ML
1-0
+3.75u
+1.5pp
Eredivisie / Game ML
1-0
+3.60u
+7.6pp
Favorite teams
New York Mets +5.2uWashington Nationals +4.0uNew York Yankees +3.3uBaltimore Orioles +3.3uMilwaukee Brewers +2.5uSan Francisco Giants +2.6u
Line Value = avg price edge vs the sharp reference at pick time on MIDAS picks a user tailed (manual bets have no reference, shown —). Passwords are one-way hashed — use reset to set a new one for a locked-out user. Stats sync from each user's tracker as they use it.
💬 Ask MIDAS · analysis, never a lock
Ask about any game, player, or line — attach a bet-slip screenshot and MIDAS reads it ("what's the best play here?"). Analysis only, never a lock.
×
Report a problem
Tell us what went wrong — what you were doing and what you expected. Wrong grade, a number that looks off, anything that broke. This goes straight to us.
Your reports
Your bankroll
—
OverviewLifetime📊 Combined
Record (W-L)
0-0
Win rate ?
—
of finished bets
Profit / loss
—
your net result
Avg return / bet ?
—
per bet
More stats
Open
0
waiting on result
Bonus won
—
from bonus bets
Bonus lost
—
bonus bets busted
Cashed out
—
net from cashouts
Boost profit
—
boosted bets
Starting bankroll
edit anytime
+Place your own bet· single or parlay
SingleParlay
Manual bets don't auto-grade — set Won/Lost/Push yourself once it settles (right on the row).
Add 2+ legs, then enter the combined odds and total stake. Grade each leg on its row as games settle — the parlay wins only if every leg wins.
Odds formatAmericanDecimalFractionalImplied %Prediction ¢Your book
📊 Your edge · by sport → league → bet type
⏳ Active & pending
📈 Live odds via Polymarket (a public prediction market). MIDAS is not affiliated with Polymarket and takes no bets — prices are shown for tracking only.
✓ Settled today
📊 History · by day, with your daily units📅 Calendar📋 List
Lifetime profit
—
every deposit & withdrawal, all-time
Total deposited
—
money in
Total withdrawn
—
money out — pure profit taken
Net invested
—
deposits − withdrawals
Current balance
on your book right now
Lifetime ROI
—
profit ÷ deposited
Transactions
0
deposits + withdrawals
Log every time you move money in or out of a book. Lifetime profit = current balance + everything withdrawn − everything deposited — the honest all-time number. Leave current balance blank to auto-use net deposits + your tracked bet P&L.
💵 Money movement
← Back
Generated Sep 15, 10:10 PM · MIDAS bet tracker
×
×
🎁 Daily Drop · spin to win coins & diamonds
Spinning…
🛒 Shop
🎨 Cosmetics Get Diamonds
Loading cosmetics…
Bet
Nearly there
You're signed in. Last thing — do you already have a MIDAS account?
Yes — bring my history over
Just type your MIDAS username. Everything comes with it — bets, record, coins, diamonds, borders, badges. From now on you sign in with Google or X.
or
No — I'm new
Pick a username. No password needed — your Google or X login is your key.
An account can only be claimed once — after that it's locked to that login. Wrong account claimed? Email support and we'll unlink it.
Welcome back
Your bets, your record and everything you're tailing — on whatever device you're holding.
MIDAS is the glass box for sports betting. Watch 314 strategy bots bet in public with full track records, auto-grade your own real bets from final scores, and sharpen your edge in a practice sim with no money at stake — all in one place.
No card requiredAuto-graded from real scoresNot a sportsbook
Ranked by profit · paper bets, 1u flat, graded from final scores
Loading live records…
Follow any bot and tail its live picks to your tracker →
Strategy Bots
314
every method public
Games in the lake
1,470
graded props: 29,681 · since 2026-07-12
Grading
Auto
from real final scores
Your money at risk
$0
tracking, not a book
The Zoo
314 bots. One method each. Zero spin.
Most "expert picks" quietly bury their losses. The Zoo can't. Each bot bets a single plain-language strategy in the open, and its entire record — wins, losses, cold streaks and all — is public forever.
✓Every pick logged before the game, graded after — no cherry-picking.
✓Sort by profit, win rate, or line value. The losers stay on the board too.
✓Adopt a bot and tail its live picks into your own tracker.
The board tells on itselfLive
Winners and losers, same board — nothing swept under
Loading real bot records…
Every bot's whole record is public forever →
Your tracker
Log it once. We settle it.
Type a bet, snap your slip, or tail a bot. MIDAS pulls the real final score and grades it automatically — bankroll, record, ROI, line value and profit, always current.
✓Bet-slip photo OCR, manual entry, or tap-a-line from the odds board.
✓Graded from real final scores — pre-game, live and past bets tracked apart.
✓See your true edge broken down by sport and bet type.
Yankees ML-135Won
Dodgers/Padres Over 8.5-110Lost
Judge 1+ HR+340Live
Play for coins, not cash
A safe practice sportsbook — coins to bet on real games at real odds, graded from real results. Daily wheel, streaks, achievements, unlockable cosmetics and a competitive leaderboard. Zero real money, ever.
📊
Every player's whole career
Search any player and see career, current-season and last-5 averages from real game logs — the context that actually moves a prop, matched to our odds history.
See the glass box for yourself.
Free to start. No card. Not a sportsbook — we never take a wager.
MIDAS is a sports-bet tracking & analysis tool for entertainment and informational purposes only — not financial, investment, or betting advice. MIDAS does not accept wagers. 21+ · Please gamble responsibly · Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER Terms · Privacy · Responsible Gambling
Track your bets freeAuto-graded · 314 strategy bots · practice sim, no money
